Comment les réseaux sociaux façonnent-ils la réflexion des étudiants en médecine à l’égard de leurs premières expériences cliniques significatives?
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73422Résumé
Contexte : Les cursus d’études en médecine offrent de plus en plus d’occasions de guider la réflexion des étudiants. Cependant, les approches pédagogiques se limitent souvent à des initiatives formelles en classe où la réflexion est obligatoire et évaluée. Il y a peu d’études scientifiques sur la réflexion personnelle et authentique des étudiants en dehors des cours. Cet article vise à explorer comment les réseaux sociaux peuvent façonner des dimensions de la réflexion.
Méthodes : Cette étude est fondée sur une approche qualitative d’analyse des réseaux sociaux avec un échantillon de base de sept étudiants en première année de médecine qui ont décrit leurs relations avec 61 personnes issues de leurs réseaux. Les données sont constituées de sociogrammes créés par les participants et d’entretiens individuels semi-structurés.
Résultats : De nombreux apprenants ont eu du mal à trouver une manière de partager leurs nouvelles expériences éducatives de façon significative avec leurs réseaux sociaux extérieurs à la médecine. Le fait que les participants soulignent l’utilité des occasions qu’offre leur programme, comme les séances de réflexion sur le portfolio, pour accéder à une diversité de perspectives est également intéressant à noter.
Conclusions : Notre étude est l’une des premières à analyser l’utilisation que font les étudiants en médecine de réseaux sociaux tant l’intérieur qu’à l’extérieur de la faculté pour soutenir leur réflexion sur leurs premières expériences cliniques importantes et pour en discuter. Des publications scientifiques récentes suggèrent que ces réflexions sont personnelles et diversifiées et notre étude en apporte la preuve empirique. Nos observations soulignent l’importance de passer d’une approche instrumentale à une approche authentique et socialement située si nous souhaitons cultiver un apprentissage réflexif tout au long de la vie.
Statistiques
Références
Nguyen QD, Fernandez N, Karsenti T, Charlin B. What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component model. Med Educ. 2014;48(12):1176-1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12583
Driessen E, Van Tartwijk J, Van Der Vleuten C, Wass V. Portfolios in medical education: Why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1224-1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02944.x
Barnard-Ashton P, Rothberg A, McInerney P. The integration of blended learning into an occupational therapy curriculum: a qualitative reflection. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0977-1
Ng SL, Mylopoulos M, Kangasjarvi E, et al. Critically reflective practice and its sources: A qualitative exploration. Med Educ. 2020;54(4):312-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14032
Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):685-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903050374
Murdoch-Eaton D, Sandars J. Reflection: moving from a mandatory ritual to meaningful professional development. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(3):279-283. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303948
Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2009;14(4):595-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2
Wald HS. Professional identity (trans)formation in medical education: reflection, relationship, resilience. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):701-706. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000731
Stubbing E, Helmich E, Cleland J. Authoring the identity of learner before doctor in the figured world of medical school. Perspect Med Educ. 2018:40-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0399-0
Driessen EW, Van Tartwijk J, Overeem K, Vermunt JD, Van Der Vleuten CPM. Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1230-1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x
Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. 2014;89(11):1446-1451. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427
Steinert Y. Educational theory and strategies to support professionalism and professional identity formation. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y, eds. Teaching Medical Professionalism, 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press; 2016:68-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316178485.007
Wilson H. Critical reflection in medical training and the biomedical world view. Med Educ. 2020;54(4):281-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14077
de la Croix A, Veen M. The reflective zombie: problematizing the conceptual framework of reflection in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2018:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0479-9
Ng SL, Kinsella EA, Friesen F, Hodges B. Reclaiming a theoretical orientation to reflection in medical education research: A critical narrative review. Med Educ. 2015;49(5):461-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12680
Wass V, Harrison C. Empowering the learner to reflect: do we need another approach? Med Educ. 2014;48(12):1146-1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12612
Fragkos KC. Reflective practice in healthcare education: an umbrella review. Educ Sci. 2016;6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030027
Uygur J, Stuart E, De Paor M, et al. A best evidence in medical education systematic review to determine the most effective teaching methods that develop reflection in medical students: BEME Guide No. 51. Med Teach. 2019;41(1):3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1505037
Aronson L. Twelve tips for teaching reflection at all levels of medical education. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):200-205. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.507714
Schei E, Fuks A, Boudreau JD. Reflection in medical education: intellectual humility, discovery, and know-how. Med Heal Care Philos. 2019;22:167-178.
Driessen E. Do portfolios have a future? Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2017;22(1):221-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9679-4
Isba R, Woolf K, Hanneman R. Social network analysis in medical education. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):81-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13152
Nimmon L, Regehr G. The complexity of patients’ health communication social networks: a broadening of physician communication. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(4):352-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2017.1407656
Roberts LW. Belonging, respectful inclusion, and diversity in medical education. Acad Med. 2020;95(5):661-664. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003215
Prideaux D. Social network analysis in medical education: a methodology in search of a theory. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):9-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13217
Nimmon L, Cristancho S. When I say … networks and systems. Med Educ. 2019;53(4):3-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13673
Buckley H, Nimmon L. learning in faculty development: the role of social networks. Acad Med. 2020;95(11S):S20-S27. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003627
Marin A, Wellman B. Social network analysis: an introduction. In: Carrington P, Scott J, eds. Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE; 2011:11-25.
Nimmon L, Artino AR, Varpio L, Artino Jr AR, Varpio L. Social network theory in interprofessional education: revealing hidden power. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(3):247-250. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00253.1
Atherley AEN, Nimmon L, Teunissen PW, Dolmans D, Hegazi I, Hu W. Students’ social networks are diverse, dynamic and deliberate when transitioning to clinical training. Med Educ. 2020;00(September):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14382
Nimmon L, Atherley A. Qualitative ego networks in health professions education: capturing the self in relation to others. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):71-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14663
University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine. Statistical data on application and admissions.; 2017.
Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe L V., Brien BCO, Rees CE. Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation , saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):40-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Bellotti E. Qualitative networks: mixed methods in sociological research. new York: Routledge; 2015. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.638
Hogan B, Carrasco JA, Wellman B. Visualizing personal networks: Working with participant-aided sociograms. Field methods. 2007;19(2):116-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X06298589
Huot S, Rudman DL. Extending beyond qualitative interviewing to illuminate the tacit nature of everyday occupation: Occupational mapping and participatory occupation methods. OJTR Occup Particip Heal. 2015;35(3):142-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449215576488
Hollstein B. Qualitative approaches. In: Carrington P, Scott J, eds. Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE; 2011:404-416.
Larsson J, Holmström I. Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis : Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2007;2(1):55-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620601068105
Wojnar DM, Swanson KM. Phenomenology: an exploration. J Holist Nurs. 2007;25(3):172-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010106295172
Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;0(0):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36:391-409.
Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Heal Sci. 2013;15(3):398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W, John S, Eaton L. Critically appraising qualitative research. Was the sample used in the study appropriate to its research. Bmj. 2008;337(a1035):1-6. https://www.bmj.com/content/337/bmj.a1035.
King N, Bravington A, Brooks J, Hardy B, Melvin J, Wilde D. The pictor technique: a method for exploring the experience of collaborative working. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(8):1138-1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313495326
Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. Br Med J. 2000;320(7226):50-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50
Hogg MA, Terry DJ, White KM. A tale of two theories : a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Soc Psychol Q. 1995;58(4):255-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787127
Burford B. Group processes in medical education: learning from social identity theory. Med Educ. 2012;46(2):143-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04099.x
Gillespie H, Kelly M, Gormley G, King N, Gilliland D, Dornan T. How can tomorrow’s doctors be more caring? A phenomenological investigation. Med Educ. 2018;52(10):1052-1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13684
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245-1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Lovell B. “We are a tight community”: social groups and social identity in medical undergraduates. Med Educ. 2015;49(10):1016-1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12781
Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;14(1):20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:415-444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Weaver R, Peters K, Koch J, Wilson I. “Part of the team”: professional identity and social exclusivity in medical students. Med Educ. 2011;45(12):1220-1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04046.x
Blakey H, Blanshard E, Cole H, Leslie F, Sen R. Are medical students socially exclusive? A comparison with economics students. Med Educ. 2008;42(11):1088-1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03126.x
Nimmon L, Regehr G. The complexity of patients’ health communication social networks: a broadening of physician communication. teach Learn Med. December 2017:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2017.1407656
Bleakley A, Bligh J. Students learning from patients: let’s get real in medical education. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2008;13(1):89-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9028-0
Shapiro J. Walking a mile in their patients’ shoes: empathy and othering in medical students’ education. Philos Ethics, Humanit Med. 2008;3(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-3-10
Keren D, Lockyer J, Ellaway RH. Social studying and learning among medical students: a scoping review. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(5):311-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0358-9
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Samantha Stasiuk, Maria Hubinette, Laura Nimmon 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
La soumission d’un manuscrit original à la revue constitue une indication qu’il s’agit d’un travail original, qu’il n’a jamais été publié et qu’il n’est pas envisagé pour publication dans une autre revue. S’il est accepté, il sera publié en ligne et ne pourra l’être ailleurs sous la même forme, à des fins commerciales, dans quelque langue que ce soit, sans l’accord de l’éditeur.
La publication d’une recherche scientifique a pour but la diffusion de connaissances et, sous un régime sans but lucratif, ne profite financièrement ni à l’éditeur ni à l’auteur.
Les auteurs qui publient dans la Revue canadienne d’éducation médicale acceptent de publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Paternité - Pas d’utilisation commerciale, Pas de modification 4.0 Canada. Cette licence permet à quiconque de télécharger et de partager l’article à des fins non commerciales, à condition d’en attribuer le crédit aux auteurs. Pour plus de détails sur les droits que les auteurs accordent aux utilisateurs de leur travail, veuillez consulter le résumé de la licence et la licence complète.
