Analysis of authentic assessment in health professions education: a scoping review and concept analysis protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79812References
Marceau M, Gallagher F, Young M, St-Onge C. Validity as a social imperative for assessment in health professions education: a concept analysis. Med Educ. 2018 Jun 1;52(6):641–53 https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13574.
Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):206–14 https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559.
Ajjawi R, Tai J, Dollinger M, Dawson P, Boud D, Bearman M. From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives. Assess Eval High Educ. 2023;1–12 https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2271193.
Rodgers BL. Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. J Adv Nurs. 1989;14(4):330–5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb03420.x.
Rodgers BL, Knafl KA. Concept development in nursing : foundations, techniques, and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005 Feb;8(1):19–32 https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci IS. 2010;5:69 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10). https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 2017;92(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467–73 https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña Johnny. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Third edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014.
Bandiera G, Boucher A, Neville A, Kuper A, Hodges B. Integration and timing of basic and clinical sciences education. Med Teach. 2013;35(5):381–7 https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.769674.
Bandiera G, Kuper A, Mylopoulos M, et al. Back from basics: integration of science and practice in medical education. Med Educ. 2018;52(1):78–85 https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13386.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ethan Bazos, Andrea Quaiattini, Meredith Young
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
