To be (virtual) or not to be: six ways to get a grip on choosing a delivery method for your educational program

Authors

  • Iman Lahouaoula University of British Columbia
  • Heather Buckley University of British Columbia
  • Nawaaz Nathoo University of British Columbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78281

Abstract

In the post-pandemic era, modalities for delivering medical education are at a crossroads. The pandemic disrupted the traditional in-person model, and a boom of virtual meetings and sessions quickly found their place in medical education. Now, educators are left with a selection of in-person, virtual, and hybrid approaches to structure medical education programming. We provide six tips to help guide medical educators on deciding between the variety of educational delivery methods.

References

1. McCarthy C, Carayannopoulos K, Walton JM. COVID-19 and changes to postgraduate medical education in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 2020 Aug 31;192(35):E1018-20. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200882

2. Evans AZ, Adhaduk M, Jabri AR, Ashwath ML. Is virtual learning here to stay? A multispecialty survey of residents, fellows, and faculty. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jun;48(6):101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101641

3. Giudice EL, Lewin LO, Welsh C, et al. Online versus in-person screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment training in pediatrics residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar 1;7(1):53-8. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-14-00367.1

4. Beaulieu-Jones BR, He K, Sell N, Whang E, Kristo G. Online morbidity and mortality conference: Here to stay or a temporary response to COVID-19? Am J Surg. 2021 Dec;222(6):1183-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.05.006

5. Reddy GB, Ortega M, Dodds SD, Brown MD. Virtual versus in-person grand rounds in orthopaedics: a framework for implementation and participant-reported outcomes. JAAOS Glob Res Rev. 2022 Jan;6(1). https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00308

6. Buckley H, Nimmon L. Social connectedness in virtual learning contexts. Clin Teach. 2021 Jun;18(3):208-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13281

7. Delunahawatta T, Dunne SS, Hyde S, et al. Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1

8. Cheng C, Papadakos J, Umakanthan B, et al. On the advantages and disadvantages of virtual continuing medical education: a scoping review. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14(3):41-74. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75681

9. Yeung, M WL, Yau AH, Lee C YP. How should webcams be used in online learning under COVID-19: a co-orientation analysis of teachers' and students' perceptions of student social presence on webcam. J Computer Assist Learn. 2022 Oct;39:399-416.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12751

10. Lee ICJ, Wong P, Goh SPL, Cook S. A synchronous hybrid team-based learning class: why and how to do it? Med Sci Educ. 2022 Jun;32(3):697-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01538-5

11. Schmid RF, Borokhovski E, Bernard RM, Pickup DI, Abrami PC. A meta-analysis of online learning, blended learning, the flipped classroom and classroom instruction for pre-service and in-service teachers. Comput Educ Open. 2023 Dec 15;5:100142.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142

Downloads

Published

2025-01-09

How to Cite

1.
Lahouaoula I, Buckley H, Nathoo N. To be (virtual) or not to be: six ways to get a grip on choosing a delivery method for your educational program. Can. Med. Ed. J [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 9 [cited 2025 Jan. 9];. Available from: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/78281

Issue

Section

Black Ice

Most read articles by the same author(s)