Methodological Decisions in Undertaking Academic Integrity Policy Analysis: Considerations for Future Research

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.11575/cpai.v3i1.69768

Mots-clés :

academic integrity, academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, Canada, policy, analysis, qualitative, research methods, collaboration, virtual team, research, post-secondary, higher education

Résumé

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to share details of the methodological decisions regarding data collection that a researcher or research team may want to consider when undertaking a policy analysis.

Methods: We have undertaken a meticulous documentation of our decision-making processes throughout the research design process.

Results: We provide narrative evidence of what worked for us as a collaborative research team.

Implications: Understanding the decisions we made throughout our research design and implementation may help other research teams, particularly those working as virtual collaborations and/or those undertaking academic integrity policy analysis.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Sarah Elaine Eaton, University of Calgary

Assistant Professor, Werklund School of Education

Research Associate, Language Research Centre

University of Calgary

Références

Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., East, J., Green, M., & James, C. (2011). Academic integrity standards: A preliminary analysis of the academic integrity policies at Australian universities. Proceedings of AuQF 2011 Demonstrating Quality (pp. 48-53). Melbourne: AuQF.

Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., James, C., Green, M., . . . Partridge, L. (2011). Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2), 3-12.

Eaton, S. E. (2019). Contract Cheating in Canada: National Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N9KWT. Retrieved from https://osf.io/n9kwt/

Eaton, S. E., & Edino, R. I. (2018). Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: A review of the research literature and call to action. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0028-7

Government of Ontario. (n.d.). Postsecondary education: Ontario Colleges. Retrieved from https://www.ontario.ca/page/ontario-colleges

Greenberg, P. S., Greenberg, R. H., & Antonucci, Y. L. (2007). Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams. Business Horizons, 50(4), 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.02.005

Grigg, G. A. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: Confronting the policy dilemma. (Doctor of Philosophy), University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

Stoesz, B., Eaton, S. E., Miron, J. B., & Thacker, E. (2019). Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4

Thacker, E., Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B., & Miron, J. B. (2019, April 18). A deep dive into Canadian college policy: Findings from a provincial academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis (updated). Paper presented at the Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity, Calgary, Canada.

Thacker, E., Miron, J. B., Eaton, S. E., & Stoesz, B. (2019, March 8). A deep dive into Canadian college policy: Findings from a provincial academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis. Paper presented at the International Center for Academic Integrity Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.

Publié-e

2020-06-05

Comment citer

Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., Thacker, E. J., & Miron, J. B. (2020). Methodological Decisions in Undertaking Academic Integrity Policy Analysis: Considerations for Future Research. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 3(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.11575/cpai.v3i1.69768

Numéro

Rubrique

Practitioner Articles

Articles les plus lus du,de la,des même-s auteur-e-s

1 2 3 > >>