Exploring Rogeting: Implications for academic integrity
Keywords:academic integrity, academic misconduct, paraphrasing, plagiarism, plagiarism detection software, Rogeting, text matching software
Poor paraphrasing can be a sign of underdeveloped writing skills that can lead to plagiarism. One example of poor paraphrasing is Rogeting, which is the substitution of words with their synonyms using Roget’s thesaurus or other digital synonym providers. In this position paper, we discuss Rogeting as a form of poor paraphrasing that may lead to academic integrity breaches, such as plagiarism. We discuss methods of identifying Rogeted text, concluding with practical recommendations for educators about how to better support student writers so they can avoid Rogeting in favour of developing their writing skills.
Eaton, S. E. (2017). Comparative analysis of institutional policy definitions of plagiarism: A pan-Canadian university study. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 48(3), 271-281. doi:10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7
Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
Eaton, S. E., Takrimi, A., & Khojasteh Mehr, R. (2019, August 20). Academic integrity in Iran: The quest to combat plagiarism. Paper presented at the Werklund School of Education Research Series, Office of Research, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Grove, J. (2014). Sinister buttocks? Roget would blush at the crafty cheek. Times Higher Education, (August 7). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/sinister-buttocks-Roget-would-blush-at-the-crafty-cheek/2015027.article.
Harris, S. (2014). Sinister buttocks? University lecturer discovers meaningless phrases in essays created by students to hide plagiarism. Daily Mail. Retrieved from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2719138/Sinister-buttocks-University-lecturer-discovers-meaningless-phrases-essays-created-students-hide-plagiarism.html
Howard, R. M. (2000). The ethics of plagiarism. In M. A. Pemberton (Ed.), The ethics of writing instruction: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 79-89). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Howard, R. M., Serviss, T., & Rodrigue, T. K. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing & Pedagogy, 2(2), 177-192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v2i2.177
Leahy, A. (2008). A good Rogeting. In The woman who lived her life backwards (p. 53). Galway, Ireland: Arlen House.
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495
Mariani, J., Francopoulo, G., & Paroubek, P. (2016). A study of reuse and plagiarism in speech and natural language processing papers. BIRNDL Joint Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval and NLP for Digital Libraries (pp. 72-83).
Moore Howard, R., & Davies, L. J. (2009). Plagiarism in the Internet age. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 64-67.
Neuroskeptic (US). (2015, February 7). Plagiarism: copy, paste, Thesaurus? Retrieved from https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/plagiarism-copy-paste-thesaurus
Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317-345. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
Prentice, F. M., & Kinden, C. E. (2018). Paraphrasing tools, language translation tools and plagiarism: an exploratory study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 11. doi:10.1007/s40979-018-0036-7
Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017). Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1), 2. doi:10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y
Roget, P. M. (1856). Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (4th. ed.). London, UK: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=9nYCAAAAQAAJ&hl=en_GB&pg=GBS.PP2
Roka, Y. B. (2017). Plagiarism: Types, causes and how to avoid this worldwide problem. Nepal Journal of Neuroscience, 14(3), 2-6.
Schneider, J., Bernstein, A., Brocke, J. V., Damevski, K., & Shepherd, D. C. (2018). Detecting plagiarism based on the creation process. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(3), 348-361. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2720171
Schuman, R. (2014). Cease Rogeting Proximately! College students (and adults) sure love the right-click thesaurus. Too bad it makes you sound the opposite of smart. Retrieved from https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/08/writing-clearly-in-student-papers-the-right-click-thesaurus-and-rogeting-are-ruining-writing.html
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet and student learning: Improving academic integrity. New York, New York: Routledge.
Takrimi, A., & Eaton, S. E. (2019). Understanding Rogeting as a form of plagiarism (Poster). Poster presented at the Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity, Calgary, Canada.
Vani, K., & Gupta, D. (2016). Study on extrinsic text plagiarism detection techniques and tools. Journal of engineering science and technology review, 9(4), 150-164. doi:10.25103/jestr.094.23
Warn, J. (2006). Plagiarism software: No magic bullet! Higher Education Research & Development, 25(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600610438