Trends in female applicants to Canadian ophthalmology residency programs from 1998-2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77587Abstract
Background: Ophthalmology has historically been a male-dominated specialty. Despite there being a higher proportion of females in Canadian medical schools since the early 2000s, it is unknown if trends in female applicants and those accepted to ophthalmology have followed suit. This study aims to evaluate trends in gender representation of ophthalmology applicants to Canadian residency programs from 1998 to 2020 and to compare those trends to other surgical specialties.
Methods: We obtained aggregate data of the annual number of male and female applicants ranking and successfully matching to ophthalmology as their first-choice specialty from the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) database. We then carried out a retrospective cross-sectional analysis on the publicly available data. Subsequently, we compared trends in female applicants to ophthalmology, as well as female practicing ophthalmologists, to other surgical disciplines.
Results: The proportion of female applicants increased from 24.3% in 1998 to 33.3% in 2020 (p = 0.001), and matched female applicants increased from 28.6% in 1998 to 40.5% in 2020 (p = 0.023). However, the incremental change in proportion did not statistically significantly increase in 2008-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020. Comparison of male and female matching success rates did not reveal a significant difference (p = 0.45). Trends in female applicants to ophthalmology and female practicing ophthalmologists were similar to other surgical specialties.
Conclusions: Although the proportion of female applicants is increasing, there is a recent plateau and an inability to equalize the female-to-male ratio in ophthalmology. Further studies are needed to identify potential barriers and mitigate possible residual gender biases.
Metrics
References
Williams AP, Pierre KD, Vayda E. Women in medicine: toward a conceptual understanding of the potential for change. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 1993;48(4):115-21.
The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. Canadian Medical Education Statistics 2021. Available from: https://www.afmc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CMES-2021-Complete-EN.pdf. [Accessed May 2023].
Tricco AC, Bourgeault I, Moore A, Grunfeld E, Peer N, Straus SE. Advancing gender equity in medicine. Can Med Assoc J. 2021;193(7):E244-E250. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200951
Lorello GR, Silver JK, Moineau G, McCarthy K, Flexman AM. Trends in representation of female applicants and matriculants in Canadian residency programs across specialties, 1995 to 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2027938. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27938
Canadian Residency Matching Services. R-1 Data and reports. Available from https://www.carms.ca/data-reports/r1-data-reports/ [Accessed Nov 2020].
Servito M, Ouzounian M, Chung J, Yanagawa B. Trends in female cardiac surgery trainees and staff in Canada: 1998 to 2020. J Thorac Cardiovasc. 2022;163(2):e203-e206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.06.025
Grose E, Chen T, Siu J, Campisi P, Witterick IJ, Chan Y. National trends in gender diversity among trainees and practicing physicians in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery in Canada. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;148(1):13–19. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1431
Baerlocher MO, Noble J. Does sex affect the success rate of Canadian ophthalmology residency applicants? Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41(2):163-8. https://doi.org/10.1139/I06-003
Canadian Medical Association. Canadian Physician Data. Available from https://www.cma.ca/canadian-physician-data [Accessed Nov 2020].
Papke L, Wooldridge J. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(K) plan participation rates. J Appl Econ. 1996;11:619–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1
Anderson K, Tennankore K, Cox A. Trends in the training of female urology residents in Canada. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12(3):E105-11. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4697
Chorfi S, Schwartz JS, Verma N, Young M, Joseph L, Nguyen LHP. Evolution of gender representation among Canadian OTL-HNS residents: a 27-year analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;46(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0232-0
Ruzycki SM, Earp M, Ma IWY. Applicant gender and matching to first-choice discipline: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (2013-2019). CMAJ Open. 2020;8(2):E346-E351. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190029
Park J, Minor S, Taylor RA, Vikis E, Poenaru D. Why are women deterred from general surgery training? Am J Surg. 2005;1:141-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.008
Jolly S, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Stewart A, Ubel P, Jagsi R. Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):344-353. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-0974
Parke II, DW. Gender and Leadership. EyeNet Magazine. 2017. Available from https://www.aao.org/eyenet/article/gender-and-leadership. [Accessed Mar 6, 2021].
Kletke SN, Zhang A, Kohly RP. A national survey of Canadian women in ophthalmology: on role models, mentorship, and communities of practice. Can J Ophthalmol. 2021;56(3):203-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.10.004
Trinh LN, O’Rorke E, Mulcahey MK. Factors influencing female medical students’ decision to pursue surgical specialties: a systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(3):836-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.050
Levaillant M, Levaillant L, Lerolle N, Vallet B, Hamel-Broza JF. Factors influencing medical students’ choice of specialization: A gender based systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 2020:28:100589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100589
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Heather M McDonald, Stephanie L Cote, Austin McMillan, Sapna Sharan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
