The CanMEDS Competency Framework in laboratory medicine: a phenomenographic study exploring how professional roles are applied outside the clinical environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77140Abstract
Background: The CanMEDS Competency Framework is an internationally recognized model used to outline the proficiencies of a physician. It has predominantly been studied in clinical environments but not all medical specialties take part in direct patient contact. In laboratory medicine, the role of the physician is to promote and enhance patient diagnostics by managing and overseeing the functions of a diagnostic laboratory.
Methods: This phenomenographic study explores the lived experiences of biochemistry, microbiology, and pathology residency program directors to better understand how they utilize the CanMEDS competencies. Eight laboratory medicine program directors from across Canada were individually interviewed using a semi-structured interview, and the data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results: The findings show that the current framework is disconnected from the unique context of laboratory medicine with some competencies appearing unrelatable using the current standardized definitions and expectations. Nevertheless, participants considered the framework to be an appropriate blueprint of the competencies necessary for their professional environment, but to make it accessible more autonomy is required to adapt the framework to their needs.
Conclusion: Newer renditions of the CanMEDS Competency Framework should better consider the realities of non-clinical disciplines.
References
ACGME International. ACGME International Home. Chicago USA; 2000 (updated 2022). Available from: https://www.acgme-i.org [Accessed on Dec 8, 2022].
Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Ottawa (Canada): Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
Tromp F, Vernooij-Dassen M, Grol R, Kramer A, Bottema B. Assessment of CanMEDS roles in postgraduate training: the validation of the Compass. Patient Educ Couns. 2012(89):199-204. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.028
Norman G, Sherbino J, Dore K, et al. The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):277-284. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000105
Kogan JR, Holmboe S. Preparing residents for practice in new systems of care by preparing their teachers. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1436-1437. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000480
Jippes E, van Luijk S, Pols J, Achterkamp M, Brand P, van Engelen J. Facilitators and barriers to a nationwide implementation of competency-based postgraduate medical curricula: a qualitative study. Med Teach. 2012;34(8):e589-602. http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.670325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.670325
Ellaway R. CanMEDS is a theory. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21(5):915-917. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9724-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9724-3
Kwon H, Lee Y, Chang H, Kim A. Needs assessment of a core curriculum for residency training. Korean J Med Educ. 2015;27(3):201-212. http://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2015.27.3.201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2015.27.3.201
LaDonna K, Kahlke R, Scott I, van der Goes T, Hubinette M. Grappling with key questions about assessment of the Health Advocate role. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14(1):80-9. http://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73878
Do V, Maniate J, Sonnenberg L. To lead or to influence? Can Med Educ J. 2021;12(5):59–60. http://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.72551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.72551
Verkerk M, de Bree M, Mourits M. Reflective professionalism: interpreting CanMEDS' “professionalism”. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(11):663–6. http://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017954
Roberts G, Beiko D, Touma N, Siemens D. Are we getting through? A national survey on the CanMEDS communicator role in urology residency. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(11-12):437-41. http://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.264
Berger E, Chan M, Kuper A, et al. The CanMEDS role of Collaborator: How is it taught and assessed according to faculty and residents? Paediatr Child Health. 2012;17(10):557-60. http://doi.org/10.1093/pch/17.10.557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/17.10.557
Chou S, Cole G, McLaughlin K, Lockyer J. CanMEDS evaluation in Canadian postgraduate training programmes: tools used and programme director satisfaction. Med Educ. 2008;42(9):879-886. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03111.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03111.x
van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Scheele F, Driessen EW, Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;24(6):703-719. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001
Ringsted C, Hansen TL, Davis D, Scherbier A. Are some of the challenging aspects of the CanMEDS roles valid outside Canada? Med Educ. 2006(40):807-815. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02525.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02525.x
Yusuf E, Ong DSY, Martin-Quiros A, et al. A large survey among European trainees in clinical microbiology and infectious disease on training systems and training adequacy: identifying the gaps and suggesting improvements. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017(36):233-42. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2791-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2791-9
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Objectives of Training in the specialty of Medical Microbiology. Ottawa, Canada: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2018.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Objectives of Training in the specialty of Anatomical Pathology. Ottawa, Canada: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2013.
Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive Versus Interpretive Phenomenology: Their Contributions to Nursing Knowledge. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(5):726-35. http://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304263638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304263638
Savin-Baden M, Major C. Chapter 14: Phenomenology. Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. London (England): Routledge; 2013.
Akerlind GS. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. High Educ Res Dev. 2005;42(4):321-34. http://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.642845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence By Design: Canada’s model for competency-based medical education. Ottawa (Canada); updated 2023. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/competence-by-design-cbd-e. [Accessed on Dec 8, 2022].
Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th Ed) California (USA): SAGE Publications Inc; 2018.
Renting N, Raat ANJ, Dornan T, et al. Integrated and implicit: how residents learn CanMEDS roles by participating in practice. Med Educ. 2017(51):942-52. http://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13335
Haller BL. Resident training in microbiology. Clin Lab Med. 2007(2):369-80. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2007.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2007.04.001
ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med. 2007;82(6):542-7. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31805559c7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31805559c7
LoGiudice A, Sibbald M, Monteiro S, et al. Intrinsic or Invisible? An Audit of CanMEDS Roles in Entrustable Professional Activities. Acad Med. 2022;97(8):1213-8. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004731
van der Lee N, Fokkema J, Westerman M, et al. The CanMEDS framework: relevant but not quite the whole story. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):949-55. http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.827329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.827329
van der Lee N, Westerman M, Fokkema J, van Der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Scheele F. The curriculum for the doctor of the future: messages from the clinician’s perspective. Med Teach. 2011;33(7):555–61. http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.578176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.578176
Jippes E, van Engelen J, Brand P, Oudkerk M. Competency-based (CanMEDS) residency training programme in radiology: systematic design procedure, curriculum and success factors. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(4):967–77. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1623-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1623-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chloe Bogaty, Janneke Frambach
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
