Understanding gendered experiences in academic health sciences: a grounded theory study on leadership and continuing professional development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79839Abstract
Introduction: In order to improve equity amongst leadership roles for all genders, it is important for health professions educators to better understand the intersection of gender and leadership. This study aimed to understand how gender affects leaders in health sciences and their engagement in developing themselves further within their career by exploring: 1) Their engagement with continuing professional development; 2) Their motivations for continued learning 3) The benefits/consequences of their careers.
Methods: A Constructivist Grounded Theory approach was used to investigate this domain. Eligible leaders in health sciences were invited for one-on-one virtual interviews that were transcribed and analyzed by our research team. The data were examined initially in a constant comparative method with reflexive journaling and subsequently examined through axial coding for further themes.
Results: Eighteen qualitative interviews were analyzed. Themes pertaining to support systems, sponsorship/mentorship, and a lack of discourse surrounding gendered constraints were identified at the intersection between gender, academic leadership, and CPD within healthcare education.
Conclusion: Our findings provide insight on the gender gap and its implications on healthcare leaders’ motivations in their role, as well as engagement in continuing professional development.
Downloads
References
1. Sklar D, Yilmaz Y, Chan TM. What the COVID-19 pandemic can teach health professionals about continuing professional development. Acad Med. 2021 Oct;96(10):1379-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004245
2. Alexander JA, Comfort ME, Weiner BJ, Bogue R. Leadership in Collaborative Community Health Partnerships. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2001;12(2):159-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.12203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.12203
3. Alexander JA, Fennell ML, Halpern MT. Leadership instability in hospitals: the influence of board-CEO relations and organizational growth and decline. Adm Sci Q. 1993;38(1):74-99. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393255
4. Monteiro S, Chan TM, Kahlke R. His opportunity, her burden: a narrative critical review of why women decline academic opportunities. Med Educ. 2023;57(10):958-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15141
5. Bennett NL, Davis DA, Easterling WE, et al. Continuing medical education: a new vision of the professional development of physicians. 2000;1167-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200012000-00007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200012000-00007
6. Winters RC, Chen R, Lal S, Chan TM. Six principles for developing leadership training ecosystems in health care. Acad Med. 2022;97(6):793-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004640
7. Filipe HP, Silva ED, Stulting AA, Golnik KC. Continuing professional development: best practices. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014;21(2):134-41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.129760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.129760
8. Drude KP, Maheu M, Hilty DM. Continuing professional development: Reflections on a lifelong learning process. Psychiatr Clin. 2019;42(3):447-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2019.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2019.05.002
9. Coventry TH, Maslin-Prothero SE, Smith G. Organizational impact of nurse supply and workload on nurses continuing professional development opportunities: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(12):2715-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12724
10. Shiri R, El-Metwally A, Sallinen M, Pöyry M, Härmä M, Toppinen-Tanner S. The role of continuing professional training or development in maintaining current employment: a systematic review. Healthcare. 2023 Jan;11(21):2900. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11212900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11212900
11. World Health Organization. Gender and health. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1 [Accessed on Aug 12, 2024].
12. Government of Canada CI of HR. How to integrate sex and gender into research - CIHR. 2018 Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/50836.html. [Accessed on Nov 7, 2022].
13. Avolio BJ, Gardner WL. Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadersh Q. 2005;16(3):315-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
14. Bass BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press Google Sch. 1985;2:637-47.
15. Chuang SF. Deterrents to Women's Participation in Continuing Professional Development. New Horiz Adult Educ Hum Resour Dev. 2015 Apr;27(2):28-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20104
16. DiPrete TA, Buchmann C. The rise of women: the growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. Russell Sage Foundation; 2013. Available from: https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8QlRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=The+rise+of+women:+The+growing+gender+gap+in+education+and+what+it+means+for+American+schools&ots=7x6qBvqU1t&sig=O3uYAL3-aydRW6puhKEvbzRtRyU [Accessed on Aug 12, 2024]
17. Boyle DK, Bott MJ, Hansen HE, Woods CQ, Taunton RL. Manager's leadership and critical care nurses' intent to stay. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8(6):361. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1999.8.6.361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1999.8.6.361
18. Athanasiou T, Patel V, Garas G, et al. Mentoring perception, scientific collaboration and research performance: is there a 'gender gap' in academic medicine? An academic health science centre perspective. Postgrad Med J. 2016 Oct 1;92(1092):581-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134313
19. Wong A, McKey C, Baxter P. What's the fuss? Gender and academic leadership. J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Jan 1;32(6):779-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0061
20. Beeler WH, Griffith KA, Jones RD et al. Gender, professional experiences, and personal characteristics of academic radiation oncology chairs: data to inform the pipeline for the 21st Century. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;104(5):979-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.074
21. Clarke SO, Jordan J, Yarris LM, et al. The view from the top: academic emergency department chairs' perspectives on education scholarship. AEM Educ Train. 2018;2(1):26-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10070
22. King R, D'Souza R, Olatoye O. Gender disparity persists in pain medicine: a crosssectional study of chairpersons within ACGME accredited chronic pain fellowship programs in the United States. Postgrad Med. 2022;134(Supplement 2):1-3.
23. Lipscomb MF, Bailey DN, Howell LP, et al. Women in academic pathology: pathways to department chair. Acad Pathol. 2021;8. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105451942&doi=10.1177%2f23742895211010322&partnerID=40&md5=3a6907962c1b1502d41a5ba5661f1c88
24. Mansuri O, Fenn KA, England BA, Myers E.D. Surgery pedigree study: the pathway to chair. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3 SUPPL. 1):S123-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.284
25. Singh SK, Bi A, Kurlansky PA, Argenziano M, Smith CR. A cross-sectional review of cardiothoracic surgery department chairs and program directors. J Surg Educ. 2021;78(2):665-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.022
26. Sethuraman KN, Lin M, Rounds K, et al. Here to chair: gender differences in the path to leadership. Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(9):993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14221
27. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE; 2014. 746 p.
28. Glaser B, Strauss A. Discovery of grounded theory : strategies for qualitative research. Routledge; 2017. i p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
29. Gottlieb AS, Travis EL. Rationale and models for career advancement sponsorship in academic medicine: the time is here; the time is now. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2018 Nov;93(11):1620-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002342
30. Dhatt R, Theobald S, Buzuzi S, et al. The role of women's leadership and gender equity in leadership and health system strengthening. Glob Health Epidemiol Genomics. 2017 Jan;2:e8. https://doi.org/10.1017/gheg.2016.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gheg.2016.22
31. Jacobs JA. Gender Inequality and Higher Education. Annu Rev Sociol. 1996 Aug 1;22(Volume 22, 1996):153-85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.153
32. Kassin S, Fein S, Markus HR, McBain KA, Williams L. Social psychology Australian & New Zealand edition. Cengage AU; 2019. 776 p.
33. Eagly AH, Wood W. Social role theory. In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2012. p. 458-76. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
34. Eichenauer CJ, Ryan AM, Alanis JM. Leadership during crisis: an examination of supervisory leadership behavior and gender during COVID-19. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2022 May 1;29(2):190-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211010761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211010761
35. Mousa M, Boyle J, Skouteris H, et al. Advancing women in healthcare leadership: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of multi-sector evidence on organisational interventions. eClinicalMedicine. 2021 Sep 1;39. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(21)00364-3/fulltext [Accessed on Aug 12, 2024] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101084
36. Lewiss RE, Silver JK, Bernstein CA, Mills AM, Overholser B, Spector ND. Is academic medicine making mid-career women Physicians Invisible? J Womens Health. 2020 Feb 1;29(2):187-92. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.7732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.7732
37. Spector ND, Asante PA, Marcelin JR, et al. Women in pediatrics: progress, barriers, and opportunities for equity, diversity, and inclusion. Peds. 2019;144(5). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-2149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-2149
38. Kram KE. Phases of the mentor relationship. Acad Manage J. 1983 Dec;26(4):608-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/255910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/255910
39. O'Brien KE, Biga A, Kessler SR, Allen TD. A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring. J Manag. 2010;36(2):537-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318619
40. Files JA, Blair JE, Mayer AP, Ko MG. Facilitated peer mentorship: a pilot program for academic advancement of female medical faculty. 2008;17(6). https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0647
41. Gottlieb M, Fant A, King A, et al. One click away: digital mentorship in the modern era. Cureus. 2017;9(11). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1838
42. Landry A, Lewiss R. Is good mentorship found on Twitter? We think so. Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 14;Publish Ahead of Print. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/euro-emergencymed/Citation/9000/Is_good_mentorship_found_on_Twitter__We_think_so.99063.aspx [Accessed on Dec 23, 2020] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000745
43. Yorozuya K, Kawase K, Chizuko SA tanaka. Mentorship as experienced by women surgeons in Japan. World J Surg. 2016;40(1):38-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3245-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3245-8
44. Charles M. A world of difference: international trends in women's economic status. Annu Rev Sociol. 2011 Aug 11;37(1):355-71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102548
45. Varpio L, Paradis E, Uijtdehaage S, Young M. The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):989. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075
46. Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):312-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03295.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03295.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Laurie He, Tania Kazi, Arianna Mazzeo, Heba Khan, Siraj Mithoowani, Teresa M Chan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
