Six ways to get a grip on a mentorship program for residents and faculty

Auteurs-es

  • Lea Harper University of Calgary
  • Christopher A Hergott University of Calgary
  • Sylvain Coderre University of Calgary
  • Kenna Kelly-Turner University of Calgary
  • Melinda Davis University of Calgary
  • Kevin McLaughlin University of Calgary

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79339

Résumé

Mentorship is recognized as beneficial to the personal and professional development of physicians. It has been shown to positively influence career success and research productivity for the mentee, while being associated with increased job satisfaction and lower risk of burnout for the mentor. At an institutional level, when aligned with strategic priorities, mentorship can facilitate gender and racial equality, and improve faculty retention. Consequently, there are calls to prioritize and formalize mentorship, yet the optimal way to achieve this remains elusive. How exactly do we create a mentorship program that is viewed as effective from the perspective of the mentor, mentee, and the institution? In this article we approach mentorship as a complex system, and through this lens we aim to provide medical educators and leaders with guidance on how to create and evaluate a program that provides mentees with distributed and precision mentoring, while also aligning with institutional priorities.

Références

1. Fishman JA. Mentorship in academic medicine: competitive advantage while reducing burnout? Heal Sci Rev. 2021;1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hsr.2021.100004

2. Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor–mentee relationship in academic medicine: a qualitative study. Acad Med. 2009;84(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819301ab

3. Shen MR, Tzioumis E, Andersen E, et al. Impact of mentoring on academic career success for women in medicine: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2022;97(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004563

4. Bath EP, Brown K, Harris C, Guerrero A, Kozman D, Flippen CC 2nd, Garraway I, Watson K, Holly L, Godoy SM, Norris K, Wyatt G. For us by us: instituting mentorship models that credit minoritized medical faculty expertise and lived experience. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 21;9:966193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.966193.

5. Choi AMK, Moon JE, Steinecke A, Prescott JE. Developing a culture of mentorship to strengthen academic medical centers. Acad Med. 2019;94(5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002498

6. Harper L, Hergott C, Coderre S, Kelly-Turner K, Davis M, McLaughlin K. Mentorship in medicine is a complex opportunity. Med Teach. Jul 2024;1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2377392

7. Waldrop MM. The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Vol 7; 2015.

8. Zhou SY, Balakrishna A, Nyhof-young J, Robinson LA. What do participants value in a diversity mentorship program? Perspectives from a Canadian medical school. Equal Divers Inclus. 2021;40(8):947-959. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-12-2020-0348

9. Cohen SA. Precision mentorship in academic medicine: the right mentor for the right trainee at the right time. Acad Med. Jun 2024;99(6):p e8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005529.

10. Frye AW, Hemmer PA. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Med Teach. 2012;34(5). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2024-12-20

Comment citer

1.
Harper L, Hergott CA, Coderre S, Kelly-Turner K, Davis M, McLaughlin K. Six ways to get a grip on a mentorship program for residents and faculty. Can. Med. Ed. J [Internet]. 20 déc. 2024 [cité 21 déc. 2024];. Disponible à: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/79339

Numéro

Rubrique

Terrain glissant

Articles les plus lus du,de la,des même-s auteur-e-s

1 2 > >>