A case study: exploring the impact of 3D printed models on cognitive integration during clinical skills training

Kristina Lisk; Jeffrey JH Cheung

doi:10.36834/cmej.78564

Auteurs-es

Kristina Lisk University of Toronto
Jeffrey JH Cheung University of Illinois

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78564

Résumé

Contexte : L'intégration cognitive se produit lorsque les apprenants établissent des liens conceptuels entre des connaissances pertinentes et est connue pour améliorer l'apprentissage. Alors que plusieurs études expérimentales ont démontré comment le texte et l'enseignement audiovisuel peuvent être conçus pour améliorer l'intégration cognitive, la formation aux compétences cliniques dans des contextes réels peut nécessiter d'autres stratégies éducatives. L'introduction de modèles imprimés en trois dimensions (3D) dans l'enseignement des compétences cliniques peut offrir des occasions d'apprentissage uniques pour favoriser l'intégration cognitive.

Méthodes : En utilisant la méthodologie des études de cas, cette étude explore comment les apprenants et un instructeur ont utilisé des os imprimés en 3D pour augmenter leurs interactions d'apprentissage au cours d'un laboratoire de compétences cliniques sur la palpation de l'épaule, et pour caractériser les stratégies d'enseignement avec des os imprimés en 3D qui peuvent favoriser l'apprentissage. Les étudiants (n=21) ont travaillé en petits groupes et ont eu accès à une clavicule, une omoplate et un humérus imprimés en 3D. Les données ont été collectées par l'observation, un groupe de discussion d'étudiants et un entretien semi-structuré avec l'instructeur. Une analyse thématique a permis de passer en revue et de coder les données et de dégager des thèmes.

Résultats : Quatre thèmes ont été développés pour décrire comment les modèles imprimés en 3D ont été utilisés en classe et comment ils peuvent favoriser l'intégration cognitive : interactivité en classe, visualisation de l'anatomie, intégration des connaissances et potentiel éducatif.

Conclusions : Les résultats démontrent que les modèles imprimés en 3D peuvent améliorer la façon dont les apprenants, les instructeurs et le matériel pédagogique interagissent et la facilité avec laquelle les apprenants établissent des liens entre les différents types et sources de connaissances. Cette recherche s’ajoute à des travaux antérieurs en démontrant comment les processus d'apprentissage social et les interactions avec les modèles physiques peuvent offrir des potentialités uniques susceptibles de favoriser l'intégration cognitive.

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Kristina Lisk, University of Toronto

Kristina Lisk is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream in the Division of Anatomy at the University of Toronto. Her research interests focus on examining strategies to optimize learning of basic sciences and exploring the impact of innovative teaching tools on student learning.

Jeffrey JH Cheung, University of Illinois

Jeffrey Cheung is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Medical Education at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. His research primarily applies theories from cognitive psychology to clarify how educators can design learning experiences that better prepare learners for future clinical practice, and how to assess learners’ capacity to be flexible with their knowledge and skills.

Références

Goldman E, Schroth WS. Perspective: Deconstructing integration. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):729–734; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cad4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cad4

Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, et al. Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1578–1585; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a45def. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a45def

Baghdady MT, Carnahan H, Lam EW, et al. Integration of basic sciences and clinical sciences in oral radiology education for dental students. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(6):757–763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.6.tb05527.x

Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect Med Educ 2016;5(3):147–153; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0268-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-016-0268-2

Chaudhary ZK, Mylopoulos M, Barnett R, et al. Reconsidering basic: integrating social and behavioral sciences to support learning. Acad Med. 2019;Publish Ahead of Print; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002907

Baghdady MT, Carnahan H, Lam EWN, et al. Dental and dental hygiene students’ diagnostic accuracy in oral radiology: effect of diagnostic strategy and instructional method. J Dent Educ 2014;78(9):1279–1285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2014.78.9.tb05799.x

Kulasegaram KM, Manzone JC, Ku C, et al. Cause and effect: testing a mechanism and method for the cognitive integration of basic science. Acad Med. 2015;90:S63–S69; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000896

Woods NN, Howey EHA, Brooks LR, et al. Speed kills? Speed, accuracy, encapsulations and causal understanding. Med Educ. 2006;40(10):973–979; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02556.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02556.x

Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):107–112; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02036.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02036.x

Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2007;12(4):417–426; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9054-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9054-y

Woods NN. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning: clinical expertise. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1173–1177; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02911.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02911.x

Baghdady MT, Pharoah MJ, Regehr G, et al. The role of basic sciences in diagnostic oral radiology. J Dent Educ 2009;73(10):1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.10.tb04810.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.10.tb04810.x

Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, et al. Knowing how and knowing why: testing the effect of instruction designed for cognitive integration on procedural skills transfer. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2018;23(1):61–74; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9774-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9774-1

Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, et al. Why content and cognition matter: integrating conceptual knowledge to support simulation-based procedural skills transfer. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34(6):969–977; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04959-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04959-y

Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, et al. Making concepts material: a randomized trial exploring simulation as a medium to enhance cognitive integration and transfer of learning. simulation in healthcare: J Soc Sim Healthc. 2021;16(6):392–400; https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000543

Fenwick T, Dahlgren MA. Towards socio-material approaches in simulation-based education: lessons from complexity theory. Med Educ 2015;49(4):359–367; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12638

Hutchins E. Cognitive ecology. Topics Cogn Sci 2010;2(4):705–715; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x

Hazlehurst B. When I say … distributed cognition. Med Educ. 2015;49(8):755–756; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12672

O’Brien BC, Battista A. Situated learning theory in health professions education research: a scoping review. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2020;25(2):483–509; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w

Grierson LEM, Barry M, Kapralos B, et al. The role of collaborative interactivity in the observational practice of clinical skills. Med Educ. 2012;46(4):409–416; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04196.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04196.x

Castillo J-M, Park YS, Harris I, et al. A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):592–604; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13519

Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7(4):321–325; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1468

O’Reilly MK, Reese S, Herlihy T, et al. Fabrication and assessment of 3D printed anatomical models of the lower limb for anatomical teaching and femoral vessel access training in medicine. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(1):71–79; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1538

Mafeld S, Nesbitt C, McCaslin J, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) printed endovascular simulation models: a feasibility study. Ann Transl Med 2017;5(3):42; https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.01.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.01.16

Lim KHA, Loo ZY, Goldie SJ, et al. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: a randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9(3):213–221; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573

Smith CF, Tollemache N, Covill D, et al. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11(1):44–53; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718

Yuen J. What Is the Role of 3D Printing in undergraduate anatomy education? A scoping review of current literature and recommendations. MedSciEduc 2020;30(3):1321–1329; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00990-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00990-5

McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, et al. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(6):479–486; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475

Evans DJR, Pawlina W. Effects of Covid-19: the need to assess the real value of anatomy education. Anatom Sci Educ. 2021;14(2):129–131; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2061

Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10). https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022

Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, et al. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1178–1186; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a365d. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a365d

Khot Zaid, Quinlan Kaitlyn, Norman Geoffrey R., et al. The relative effectiveness of computer‐based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):211–215; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1355

Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, et al. “Let’s get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6(4):216–224; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1345

Wainman B, Wolak L, Pukas G, et al. The superiority of three-dimensional physical models to two-dimensional computer presentations in anatomy learning. Med Educ. 2018;52(11):1138–1146; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13683

Wainman B, Pukas G, Wolak L, et al. The critical role of stereopsis in virtual and mixed reality learning environments. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):401–412; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1928

Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. SAGE Publications, Incorporated: Thousand Oaks; 2017.

Flick U. Triangulation in data collection. In: The SAGE Handbook of qualitative data collection SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018; https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070

Mogk J, Lloyd J, Bibliowicz J, et al. The parametric human project: building a probabilistic atlas of human anatomy. Natal, Brazil; 2013.

Morgan DL, Hoffman K. Focus groups. In: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018; https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n16

Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM. Beyond the tensions within transfer theories: implications for adaptive expertise in the health professions. Adv in Health Sci Educ 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10174-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10174-y

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101; https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854; https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 2021;18(3):328–352; https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN. Examining the effect of self-explanation on cognitive integration of basic and clinical sciences in novices. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2017;22(5):1071–1083; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9743-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9743-0

Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press: New York; 2014.; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218

Greeno JG. Gibson’s affordances. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.101.2.336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.101.2.336

Greeno JG. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. Amer psychol.1998;53(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.53.1.5

Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonom Bull Rev. 2002;9(4):625–636; https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322

Jang S, Black JB, Jyung RW. Embodied cognition and virtual reality in learning to visualize anatomy. n.d.;6.

Smyth L, Carter J, Valter K, et al. Examining the short-, medium-, and long-term success of an embodied learning activity in the study of hand anatomy for clinical application. Anat Sci Educ 2021;14(2):201–209; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1987

Rabattu P-Y, Debarnot U, Hoyek N. Exploring the impact of interactive movement-based anatomy learning in real classroom setting among kinesiology students. Anat Sci Educ 2023;16(1):148–156; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2172

Brooks NB, Barner D, Frank M, et al. The role of gesture in supporting mental representations: the case of mental abacus arithmetic. Cogn Sci 2018;42(2):554–575; https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12527

Hendrick C, Heal J. Just because they’re engaged, it doesn’t mean they’re learning. n.d. Available from: https://my.chartered.college/impact_article/just-because-theyre-engaged-it-doesnt-mean-theyre-learning/ [Accessed on Mar 1, 2022].

Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, et al. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):241–251; https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287