Une perspective de théorie de l'activité sur le travail en équipe interprofessionnelle dans les soins de longue durée

Auteurs-es

  • Nicolas Fernandez Université de Montréal
  • Nicolas Gulino Université de Montréal

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77484

Résumé

Résumé

Contexte : Le travail d’une équipe interdisciplinaire (EID) est façonné par les interactions entre ses membres et l’environnement. La Théorie de l’activité historico-culturelle (TAHC) offre une perspective évolutive sur le travail en équipe. Nous avons observé les interactions au sein d’une EID pour y déceler des orientations pratiques pour la formation des soignants au travail en équipe.

Méthode : Un groupe de trois professionnels de la santé, ayant plus de 22 ans d'expérience dans un petit établissement de soins de longue durée semi-urbain, a participé à l'étude. Nous avons enregistré sur vidéo deux réunions régulières de l’EID et sélectionné 5 extraits. Les participants ont regardé les extraits vidéo et ont été invités à expliquer leurs actions. Ensuite, les participants ont visionné les mêmes extraits par groupes de deux et en ont discuté. Enfin, les participants réunis ont  revu les séquences en groupe et en ont discuté. Tous les entretiens ont été enregistrés et transcrits en vue d'une analyse thématique utilisant le cadre de la théorie de l'activité.

Résultats : L'EID se concentre sur le maintien de la santé des résidents en équilibrant les interventions de soins de santé dans un milieu de vie et de soins. L'analyse thématique nous a permis d'identifier trois thèmes : 1) les membres de l'EID se concentrent de manière asymétrique sur le maintien de la santé plutôt que sur le diagnostic et l'intervention ; 2) les interventions spécifiques à la discipline s'adaptent continuellement pour maintenir la santé des résidents, et ; 3) les activités qui ne relèvent pas des rôles professionnels génèrent des tensions et des malaises qui modifie la séparation des rôles.

Discussion : En raison de la nature du travail équipe interdisciplinaire en soins de longue durée, les frontières disciplinaires sont constamment remises en question en raison du chevauchement entre le milieu de soins qui est à la fois un milieu de vie. La théorie de l'activité apporte un éclairage utile sur cette complexité, en fournissant des données empiriques sur la manière dont les professionnels de la santé collaborent pour prodiguer des soins personnalisés dans les établissement de soins de longue durée.

Statistiques

Chargement des statistiques…

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Nicolas Fernandez, Université de Montréal

Fernandez, Nicolas, PhD, is Assistant Professor in the Department of Specialized Education and Training at the Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada. 

Nicolas Gulino, Université de Montréal

Étudiant au Doctorat en Sciences de l'éducation

Références

Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L. The wolf you feed: challenging intraprofessional workplace-based education norms. Med Educ. 2021;55(8):894-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14520

Kitto S, Wondwossen Fantaye A, Davies N, et al. The evidence base for interprofessional education within health professions education: A protocol for an update review. J Interprof Care. 2022:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2097651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2097651

Ameripour D, Matthews M, Wang Y, Mirzaian E, Kim RE. Mapping student perceptions of experiential interprofessional learning to the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) competencies. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022/02/01/ 2022;14(2):182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.11.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.11.023

Kent F, Nankervis K, Johnson C, Hodgkinson M, Baulch J, Haines T. ‘More effort and more time.’ Considerations in the establishment of interprofessional education programs in the workplace. J Interprof Care. 2018/01/02 2018;32(1):89-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1381076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1381076

Vanier M-C, Thérriault P-Y, Lebel P, et al. Innovating in teaching collaborative practice with a large student cohort at Université de Montréal. J Allied Health. 2013;42(4):e97-e106. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/asahp/jah/2013/00000042/00000004/art00014#expand/collapse

Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Studies Cont Educ. 2010;26(2):247-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245

Stalmeijer RE. Knowledgeability and identification: explaining military interprofessional healthcare teams’ excellence and readiness. Milit Med. 2021;186(Supplement_3):48-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab234

Varpio L, Bader-Larsen KS, Durning SJ, et al. Military interprofessional healthcare teams: identifying the characteristics that support success. Milit Med. 2021;186(Supplement_3):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab088

Lingard L, McDougall A, Levstik M, Chandok N, Spafford MM, Schryer C. Representing complexity well: a story about teamwork, with implications for how we teach collaboration. Med Educ. 2012;46(9):869-877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04339.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04339.x

Salas E, Wildman JL. Ten critical research questions: the need for new and deeper explorations. In: Salas E, Goodwin GF, Burke CS, eds. Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. Routledge / Taylor and Francis; 2012:525-546:chap 20.

Zwarenstein M, Rice K, Gotlib-Conn L, Kenaszchuk C, Reeves S. Disengaged: a qualitative study of communication and collaboration between physicians and other professions on general internal medicine wards. BMC Health Services Res. 2013/11/25 2013;13(1):494. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-494

Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2017;(6) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3

Xyirichis A, Reeves S, Zwarenstein M. Examining the nature of interprofessional practice: an initial framework validation and creation of the InterProfessional Activity Classification Tool (InterPACT). J Interprof Care. 2018;32(4):416-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1408576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1408576

Buzzard L, Stepp D, Elfenbein D, O'Rourke AP. Experiential learning of interdisciplinary care skills in surgery assessed from student reflections. J Surg Res. Mar 2023;283:783-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.050

Yamagata-Lynch LC. Activity systems analysis methods: understanding complex learning environments. Springer; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5

Leont'ev AN. Activity, consciousness, and personality. Hall MJ. Prentice-Hall; 1978.

Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, 2nd edition. Pearson Education, Inc.; 2015.

Schultz K, McEwen L, Griffiths J. Applying Kolb's Learning Cycle to competency-based residency education. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000479943.21563.6f DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000479943.21563.6f

Engeström Y, Pyörälä E. Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Med Teach. 2021/01/02 2021;43(1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105

Varpio L, Hall P, Lingard L, Schryer CF. Interprofessional Communication and Medical Error: A Reframing of Research Questions and Approaches. Acad Med. 2008;83(10):S76-S81. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e67b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e67b

Larsen DP, Nimmon L, Varpio L. Cultural historical activity theory: the role of tools and tensions in medical education. poster. Acad Med. 2019;94:1255. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002736

Engeström Y, Sannino A. From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, culture, and activity. 2021/01/02 2021;28(1):4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328

Vianna E, Stetsenko A. Research with a transformative activist agenda: creating the future through education for social change. Teachers college record. 2014;116(14):575-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681141160141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601412

Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research; a guide to design and implementation. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass; 2016.

Wolcott MD, Lobczowski NG. Using cognitive interviews and think-aloud protocols to understand thought processes. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021/02/01/ 2021;13(2):181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.005

Cresswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice. 2000;39(3):124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Maurel M. The explicitation interview: examples and applications. J Consciousness Studies. 2009;16(10-12):58-89. Available from https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2009/00000016/f0030010/art00003.

Fernandez N, Cyr J, Perreault I, Brault I. Revealing tacit knowledge used by experienced health professionals for interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(4):537-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1724901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1724901

Clot Y, Kostulski K. Intervening for transforming: the horizon of action in the clinic of activity. Theory & Psychol 2011;21(5):681-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543114192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419253

Kloetzer L. Concrete psychology and the activity clinic approach: implications for interventionist research in the XXIst century. Cultural-Histor Psychol. 2020;16(2):42-50. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160206

Witkop CT, Maggio LA, Harvey EJ, Torre DM. Seeing complexity: Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) as a lens for shared decision making. Acad Med. 2021;96(11):1540-1545. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004157

Byrne, D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 56, 1391–1412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Braun V, Clarke V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling Psychotherapy Res. 2021;21(1):37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Sargeant J. Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. J Cont Educ Health Profess. 2009;29(3):178-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20033

DiPierro K, Lee H, Pain KJ, Durning SJ, Choi JJ. Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2022/03/04 2022;44(3):309-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987404

Bochatay N, Bajwa NM, Ju M, Appelbaum NP, van Schaik SM. Towards equitable learning environments for medical education: bias and the intersection of social identities. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):82-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14602

Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass; 1987.

Soubra L, Badr SBY, Zhahran EM, Aboul-Seoud M. Effect of interprofessional education on role clarification and patient care planning by health professions students. J Health Prof Educ. 2018;4(4):317-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.12.005

Rydenfält C, Borell J, Erlingsdottir G. What do doctors mean when they talk about teamwork? Possible implications for interprofessional care. J Interprof Care. 2019/11/02 2019;33(6):714-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538943

Tsukube T, Matsuo M. The impact of cognitive apprenticeship on the perceived growth of junior doctors. J Workplace Learn. 2018;32(7):489-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-04-2020-0055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-04-2020-0055

Andersen P, Coverdale S, Kelly M, Forster S. Interprofessional simulation: developing teamwork using a two-tiered debriefing approach. Clini Sim Nurs. 2018;20:15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.003

Salas E, Lazzara EH, Benishek LE, King H. On being a team player: evidence-based heuristic for teamwork in interprofessional education. Med Sci Educ. 2013;23(3):524-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341675

Johannesson P. Development of professional learning communities through action research: understanding professional learning in practice. Educ Action Res. 2022;30(3):411–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1854100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1854100

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2024-08-12

Comment citer

1.
Fernandez N, Gulino N. Une perspective de théorie de l’activité sur le travail en équipe interprofessionnelle dans les soins de longue durée . Can. Med. Ed. J [Internet]. 12 août 2024 [cité 26 sept. 2024];15(4):28-39. Disponible à: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/77484

Numéro

Rubrique

Recherche originale

Articles les plus lus du,de la,des même-s auteur-e-s