Why we must incorporate primum non nocere into assessment reappraisal

Authors

  • Janeve Desy University of Calgary
  • Glenda Bendiak University of Calgary
  • Kevin Mclaughlin University of Calgary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79224

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Brown T, Berman S, McDaniel K, et al. Trauma-Informed Medical Education (TIME): advancing curricular content and educational context. Acad Med 2021;96(5):661-667. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003587.

McManus IC, Thompson M, Mollon J. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-42.

Hoyt WT. Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it? Psychol Methods 2000;5(1):64-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.5.1.64.

Kane MT. Validation. In: Brennan RL, ed. Educational measurement. 4th ed. Westport.: Praeger; 2006:17-64.

Messick S. Test validity and the ethics of assessment. Amer Psychol. 1980;35:1012-1027.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-17

How to Cite

1.
Desy J, Bendiak G, Mclaughlin K. Why we must incorporate primum non nocere into assessment reappraisal. Can. Med. Ed. J [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 17 [cited 2024 Jul. 23];. Available from: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/79224

Issue

Section

Commentary and Opinions

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>