An activity theory perspective on interprofessional teamwork in long-term care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77484Abstract
Background: Teamwork in healthcare is shaped by reciprocal interactions among individual team members and their clinical context. Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) provides a framework to study teamwork from a developmental perspective. We observed interactions between members of an Interprofessional Healthcare Team (IHT) to identify practical guidelines for educators.
Method: Three Health Care Providers (HCPs) with more than 22-years’ experience in a semi-urban LTC facility participated. We video-recorded two regular IHT meetings and selected excerpts for subsequent video-recall interviews. The excerpts were shown and discussed first with each team member, then with members in pairs and finally with all members reunited. We prompted participants to explain what was happening on the videos. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using CHAT’s unit of analysis based on Activity Systems.
Findings: We observed contradictions within the Activity Systems involving diverging views on outcomes of enhancing or maintaining quality of life; using non-traditional tools and spaces to sustain resident mobility; safeguarding community and patient safety despite time constraints and job titles, and unease for being paid to perform unconventional interventions. The contradictions have been grouped into three themes reflecting the Activity Systems: 1) enhancing versus maintaining quality of life; 2) improvising to achieve care goals; and 3) role fluidity.
Discussion: Our findings show that practical goal-oriented and contextual adaptations rely heavily on improvisation and dialogue. Educating HCPs for interprofessional teamwork should focus on developing situational awareness to foster continuous adaptation of disciplinary interventions.
References
Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L. The wolf you feed: challenging intraprofessional workplace-based education norms. Med Educ. 2021;55(8):894-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14520
Kitto S, Wondwossen Fantaye A, Davies N, et al. The evidence base for interprofessional education within health professions education: A protocol for an update review. J Interprof Care. 2022:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2097651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2097651
Ameripour D, Matthews M, Wang Y, Mirzaian E, Kim RE. Mapping student perceptions of experiential interprofessional learning to the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) competencies. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022/02/01/ 2022;14(2):182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.11.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.11.023
Kent F, Nankervis K, Johnson C, Hodgkinson M, Baulch J, Haines T. ‘More effort and more time.’ Considerations in the establishment of interprofessional education programs in the workplace. J Interprof Care. 2018/01/02 2018;32(1):89-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1381076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1381076
Vanier M-C, Thérriault P-Y, Lebel P, et al. Innovating in teaching collaborative practice with a large student cohort at Université de Montréal. J Allied Health. 2013;42(4):e97-e106. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/asahp/jah/2013/00000042/00000004/art00014#expand/collapse
Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Studies Cont Educ. 2010;26(2):247-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245
Stalmeijer RE. Knowledgeability and identification: explaining military interprofessional healthcare teams’ excellence and readiness. Milit Med. 2021;186(Supplement_3):48-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab234
Varpio L, Bader-Larsen KS, Durning SJ, et al. Military interprofessional healthcare teams: identifying the characteristics that support success. Milit Med. 2021;186(Supplement_3):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab088
Lingard L, McDougall A, Levstik M, Chandok N, Spafford MM, Schryer C. Representing complexity well: a story about teamwork, with implications for how we teach collaboration. Med Educ. 2012;46(9):869-877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04339.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04339.x
Salas E, Wildman JL. Ten critical research questions: the need for new and deeper explorations. In: Salas E, Goodwin GF, Burke CS, eds. Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. Routledge / Taylor and Francis; 2012:525-546:chap 20.
Zwarenstein M, Rice K, Gotlib-Conn L, Kenaszchuk C, Reeves S. Disengaged: a qualitative study of communication and collaboration between physicians and other professions on general internal medicine wards. BMC Health Services Res. 2013/11/25 2013;13(1):494. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-494
Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2017;(6) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
Xyirichis A, Reeves S, Zwarenstein M. Examining the nature of interprofessional practice: an initial framework validation and creation of the InterProfessional Activity Classification Tool (InterPACT). J Interprof Care. 2018;32(4):416-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1408576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1408576
Buzzard L, Stepp D, Elfenbein D, O'Rourke AP. Experiential learning of interdisciplinary care skills in surgery assessed from student reflections. J Surg Res. Mar 2023;283:783-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.050
Yamagata-Lynch LC. Activity systems analysis methods: understanding complex learning environments. Springer; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5
Leont'ev AN. Activity, consciousness, and personality. Hall MJ. Prentice-Hall; 1978.
Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, 2nd edition. Pearson Education, Inc.; 2015.
Schultz K, McEwen L, Griffiths J. Applying Kolb's Learning Cycle to competency-based residency education. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000479943.21563.6f DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000479943.21563.6f
Engeström Y, Pyörälä E. Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Med Teach. 2021/01/02 2021;43(1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105
Varpio L, Hall P, Lingard L, Schryer CF. Interprofessional Communication and Medical Error: A Reframing of Research Questions and Approaches. Acad Med. 2008;83(10):S76-S81. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e67b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e67b
Larsen DP, Nimmon L, Varpio L. Cultural historical activity theory: the role of tools and tensions in medical education. poster. Acad Med. 2019;94:1255. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002736
Engeström Y, Sannino A. From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, culture, and activity. 2021/01/02 2021;28(1):4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Vianna E, Stetsenko A. Research with a transformative activist agenda: creating the future through education for social change. Teachers college record. 2014;116(14):575-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681141160141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601412
Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research; a guide to design and implementation. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass; 2016.
Wolcott MD, Lobczowski NG. Using cognitive interviews and think-aloud protocols to understand thought processes. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021/02/01/ 2021;13(2):181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.005
Cresswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice. 2000;39(3):124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Maurel M. The explicitation interview: examples and applications. J Consciousness Studies. 2009;16(10-12):58-89. Available from https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2009/00000016/f0030010/art00003.
Fernandez N, Cyr J, Perreault I, Brault I. Revealing tacit knowledge used by experienced health professionals for interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(4):537-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1724901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1724901
Clot Y, Kostulski K. Intervening for transforming: the horizon of action in the clinic of activity. Theory & Psychol 2011;21(5):681-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543114192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419253
Kloetzer L. Concrete psychology and the activity clinic approach: implications for interventionist research in the XXIst century. Cultural-Histor Psychol. 2020;16(2):42-50. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160206
Witkop CT, Maggio LA, Harvey EJ, Torre DM. Seeing complexity: Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) as a lens for shared decision making. Acad Med. 2021;96(11):1540-1545. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004157
Byrne, D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 56, 1391–1412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Braun V, Clarke V. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling Psychotherapy Res. 2021;21(1):37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Sargeant J. Theories to aid understanding and implementation of interprofessional education. J Cont Educ Health Profess. 2009;29(3):178-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20033
DiPierro K, Lee H, Pain KJ, Durning SJ, Choi JJ. Groupthink among health professional teams in patient care: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2022/03/04 2022;44(3):309-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1987404
Bochatay N, Bajwa NM, Ju M, Appelbaum NP, van Schaik SM. Towards equitable learning environments for medical education: bias and the intersection of social identities. Med Educ. 2022;56(1):82-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14602
Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass; 1987.
Soubra L, Badr SBY, Zhahran EM, Aboul-Seoud M. Effect of interprofessional education on role clarification and patient care planning by health professions students. J Health Prof Educ. 2018;4(4):317-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2017.12.005
Rydenfält C, Borell J, Erlingsdottir G. What do doctors mean when they talk about teamwork? Possible implications for interprofessional care. J Interprof Care. 2019/11/02 2019;33(6):714-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538943
Tsukube T, Matsuo M. The impact of cognitive apprenticeship on the perceived growth of junior doctors. J Workplace Learn. 2018;32(7):489-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-04-2020-0055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-04-2020-0055
Andersen P, Coverdale S, Kelly M, Forster S. Interprofessional simulation: developing teamwork using a two-tiered debriefing approach. Clini Sim Nurs. 2018;20:15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.003
Salas E, Lazzara EH, Benishek LE, King H. On being a team player: evidence-based heuristic for teamwork in interprofessional education. Med Sci Educ. 2013;23(3):524-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341675
Johannesson P. Development of professional learning communities through action research: understanding professional learning in practice. Educ Action Res. 2022;30(3):411–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1854100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1854100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nicolas Fernandez, Nicolas Gulino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
