An Attribution Theory Lens on Plagiarism: Examining the Beliefs of Preservice Teachers


  • Lauren D. Goegan University of Manitoba
  • Lia M. Daniels



Plagiarism, Academic Misconduct, Attribution Theory, Preservice Teachers, Controllability, Canadian


Academic misconduct is a prominent issue at postsecondary institutions. This issue includes the act of plagiarism, which has received considerable attention on campuses. There is a growing body of research examining why students engage in plagiarism, and what they know about plagiarism, but little of this research is guided by a theoretical framework. Although all students may be tempted to plagiarize, students in teacher education programs represent a unique population because they are concerned with developing their own academic performance alongside the skills necessary to manage situations of academic misconduct as future teachers. Therefore, our first aim was to examine preservice teachers’ beliefs about plagiarism. Then, following the principles of Attribution Theory, our second aim was to investigate how beliefs of controllability related to acts of plagiarism impacted participants views on responsibility, emotions, help giving, and reporting. We used a within-person repeated measures design with three levels of controllability manipulated through hypothetical scenarios of plagiarism to collect data from 201 preservice teachers. Overall, preservice teachers had strong beliefs about plagiarism. Moreover, when scenarios included students who engaged in plagiarism that was controllable, participants were more likely to view the student as responsible, feel anger towards them, support punishment, and recommend reporting the student, than when the act of plagiarism was not seen as controllable. We provide recommendations for instructors and administrators for supporting students and highlight limitations and directions for future research.


Ahmed, S., & Anirvan, P. (2020). The true meaning of plagiarism. Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 15(3), 155-158.

Aickin, M., & Gensler, H. (1996). Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods. American Journal of Public Health, 86(5), 726-728.

Anderman, E. M., Tilak, S., Perry, A. H., von Spiegel, J., & Black, A. (2022). Academic Motivation and Cheating: A Psychological Perspective. In D. A. Rettinger & T. B. Gallant, (Eds.), Cheating Academic Integrity: Lessons from 30 Years of Research (pp. 75-92). John Wiley & Sons

Awasthi, S. (2019). Plagiarism and academic misconduct: A systematic review. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(2), 94-100.

Awdry, R., & Sarre, R. (2013). An investigation into plagiarism motivations and prevention techniques: Can they be appropriately aligned? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9(2) 35– 49.

Awosoga, O., Varsanyi, S., Nord, C., Barley, R., & Meadows, J. (2021). Motivators for student academic dishonesty at a medium sized university in Alberta, Canada: Faculty and student perspectives. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 4(1), 91-109.

Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism among Iranian graduate students of language studies: Perspectives and causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 240-258.

Bautista, R. M., & Pentang, J. T. (2022). Ctrl C+ Ctrl V: Plagiarism and knowledge on referencing and citation among pre-service teachers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(2), 245-257.

Brun, L., Pansu, P., & Dompnier, B. (2021). The role of causal attributions in determining behavioral consequences: A meta-analysis from an intrapersonal attributional perspective in achievement contexts. Psychological Bulletin, 147(7), 701–718.

de Maio, C., Dixon, K., & Yeo, S. (2020). Responding to student plagiarism in Western Australian universities: the disconnect between policy and academic staff. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(1), 102-116.

DiPaulo, D. (2022). Do preservice teachers cheat in college, too? A quantitative study of academic integrity among preservice teachers. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 1-14.

Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. ABC-CLIO.

Eaton, S. E., Guglielmin, M., & Otoo, B. (2017). Plagiarism: Moving from punitive to pro-active approaches. In A. P. Preciado Babb, L. Yeworiew, & S. Sabbaghan (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the IDEAS Conference 2017: Leading Educational Change Conference (pp. 28-36). Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary.

Fish, R., & Hura, G. (2013). Students' perceptions of plagiarism. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 33-45.

Fontaine, S., Frenette, E., & Hébert, M. H. (2020). Exam cheating among Quebec’s preservice teachers: The influencing factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1), 1-18.

Fu, K. W., & Tremayne, K. S. (2021). Self-efficacy and self-control mediate the relationship between negative emotions and attitudes toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1-21.

Goegan, L. D., Tulloch, S. L. P., & Daniels L. M. (2023). Preservice Teacher Beliefs about Academic Dishonesty: An Attribution Theory Lens to Causal Search. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(2), 1-11.

Gibson, C., Khey, D., & Schreck, C. (2008). Gender, internal controls, and academic dishonesty: Investigating mediating and differential effects. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19(1), 2-18.

Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 5-39.

Graham, S., & Taylor, A. Z. (2016). Attribution theory and motivation in school. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 11-33). Routledge.

Hareli, S. (2014). Making sense of the social world and influencing it by using a naïve attribution theory of emotions. Emotion Review, 6(4), 336-343.

Jamieson, S. & Howard, R. M. (2019). Rethinking the relationship between plagiarism and academic integrity. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire / International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education, 16(2), 69–85.

JASP Team (2023). JASP (Version 0.17.2)[Computer software].

Jones, D. L. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Are more students cheating?. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141-150.

Khaled, F., & Al-Tamimi, M. S. H. (2021). Plagiarism detection methods and tools: An overview. Iraqi Journal of Science, 2771-2783.

Kwong, T., Ng, H. M., Mark, K. P., & Wong, E. (2010). Students' and faculty's perception of academic integrity in Hong Kong. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(5), 341-355.

Madara, D. S., & Namango, S. S. (2016). Faculty perceptions on cheating in exams in undergraduate engineering. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 70-86.

Martin, D., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. (2011). Ethnicity, acculturation, and plagiarism: A criterion study of unethical academic conduct. Human organization, 70(1), 88-96.

Maxwell, B., Tremblay-Laprise, A. A., & Filion, M. (2015). A survey of ethics curriculum in Canadian initial teacher education. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill, 50(1), 15-37.

Menec, V. H., & Perry, R. P. (1995). Reactions to stigmas: The effect of targets' age and controllability of stigmas. Journal of Aging and Health, 7(3), 365-383.

Merkel, W. (2021). Simple, yet complex: Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of plagiarism at a Norwegian university. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-13.

Morasse, M. E. (2021). Quebec universities have seen cases of plagiarism double since the start of the pandemic. Toronto Star.

Muschetto, T., & Siegel, J. T. (2019). Attribution theory and support for individuals with depression: The impact of controllability, stability, and interpersonal relationship. Stigma and Health, 4(2), 126–135.

Okonofua, J. A., Goyer, J. P., Lindsay, C. A., Haugabrook, J., & Walton, G. M. (2022). A scalable empathic-mindset intervention reduces group disparities in school suspensions. Science advances, 8(12), 1-10.

Okonofua, J. A., Paunesku, D., & Walton, G. M. (2016). Brief intervention to encourage empathic discipline cuts suspension rates in half among adolescents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(19), 5221-5226.

Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.

Peritz, A., (2022). A.I. Is Making It Easier Than Ever for Students to Cheat.

Romanowski, M. H. (2022). Preservice teachers’ perception of plagiarism: A case from a college of education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(3), 289-309.

Rudolph, U., & Tscharaktschiew, N. (2014). An attributional analysis of moral emotions: Naïve scientists and everyday judges. Emotion Review, 6(4), 344-352.

Stockman, F., & Mureithi, C. (2019). Cheating, Inc.: How Writing Papers for American College Students Has Become a Lucrative Profession Overseas.

Stoklasa, J., Talášek, T., & Stoklasová, J. (2019). Semantic differential for the twenty-first century: Scale relevance and uncertainty entering the semantic space. Quality & Quantity, 53(1), 435-448.

Thomas, A. (2017). Faculty reluctance to report student plagiarism: A case study. African Journal of Business Ethics, 11(1), 103-119.

Tiggemann, M., & Anesbury, T. (2000). Negative stereotyping of obesity in children: The role of controllability beliefs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(9), 1977-1993.

Tindall, I. K., & Curtis, G. J. (2020). Negative emotionality predicts attitudes toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(1), 89-102.

Tripathi, S. (2022). Teacher Adds A Fake Question To Test Paper To Catch Cheating Students, Finds 14 Cheats.

Tscharaktschiew, N., & Rudolph, U. (2016). The who and whom of help giving: An attributional model integrating the help giver and the help recipient. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 90-109.

Turnitin, LLC. (2022). Turnitin for Higher Education: Everything you need to uphold integrity at your institution.

University of Alberta (2022a). Code of Student Behaviour.

University of Alberta (2022b). How to Avoid Plagiarism.

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.

Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attribution perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1-14.

Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28-36.

Weiner, B. (2014). The attribution approach to emotion and motivation: History, hypotheses, home runs, headaches/heartaches. Emotion Review, 6(4), 353-361.

Weiner, B. (2018). The legacy of an attribution approach to motivation and emotion: A no-crisis zone. Motivation Science, 4(1), 4–14.

Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of personality and social psychology, 55(5), 738- 748.

Wilhoit, S. (1994) Helping students avoid plagiarism, College Teaching, 42(4), p. 161–165.

Witmer, H., & Johansson, J. (2018). The role of gender when faculty members assign consequences for academic dishonesty. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2018(183), 73-82.

Yao, E., & Siegel, J. T. (2021). The influence of perceptions of intentionality and controllability on perceived responsibility: Applying attribution theory to people’s responses to social transgression in the COVID-19 pandemic. Motivation Science, 7(2), 199–206.




How to Cite

Goegan, L. D., & Daniels, L. M. . (2023). An Attribution Theory Lens on Plagiarism: Examining the Beliefs of Preservice Teachers. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 6(2).



Peer-reviewed Articles