The Hyperlinked Visual-Spatial Map as a Novel Way to Explore an Academic Discipline
Keywords:
Learning Theories, Graduate Education, Visual-Spatial Digital Maps, Research StrategiesAbstract
Becoming familiar with the overabundance of learning theories is daunting for most graduate students pursuing PhDs in education. This think-piece explores three strategies to support graduate students in familiarizing themselves with learning theories in education, emphasizing the third strategy of using visual-spatial digital maps. As a first strategy, a graduate student might conduct searches in the hope of finding theories that fit with one’s interests. This scattershot approach involves randomness, as the relative novice is compelled to navigate and make sense of diverse ideas from a vast field of knowledge. A second, more systematic strategy is to read a textbook written or assembled by highly regarded authorities in the field. This approach affords a much more coherent way of reviewing relevant theories in a field of study, but the biases of authors and editors can skew it. A third strategy involves using emergent, hyperlinked, visual-spatial digital maps. Two such maps are presented and used to illustrate current and emerging possibilities for exploring and locating oneself in a vibrant research domain.
References
Ainsworth, S. (2018). Multiple representations and multimedia learning. International handbook of the learning sciences, 96-105.
Budd, J. W. (2004) Mind Maps As Classroom Exercises. The Journal of Economic Education, 35:1, 35-46. doi: 10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46
Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020). Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 93-97. Doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
Davis, B., & Francis, K. (2021). Discourses on learning in education: Making sense of a landscape of difference. Frontiers in Education, 6. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.760867
Dubbs, C. H. (2021). Using the maps. Math Education Atlas. MathEdAtlas.org
Fischer, F., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Goldman, S. R., & Reimann, P. (2018). International Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Routledge.
Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1986). Assessing understanding by means of Venn diagrams. Science Education, 70(2), 151-158.
Harries, G., Wilkinson, D., Price, L., Fairclough, R., & Thelwall, M. (2004). Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping. Journal of Information Science, 30(5), 436–447.
Hyerle, D. (1996). Thinking Maps: Seeing Is Understanding. Educational leadership, 53(4), 85-89.
Kong, X., Shi, Y., Yu, S., Liu, J., & Xia, F. (2019). Academic social networks: Modeling, analysis, mining and applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 132, 86-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.01.029
Newcombe, N., & Huttenlocher, J. (2003). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. MIT Press.
Otto, C. A., & Everett, S. A. (2013). An instructional strategy to introduce pedagogical content knowledge using Venn diagrams. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 391-403.
Peer, M., Brunec, I. K., Newcombe, N. S., & Epstein, R. A. (2021). Structuring knowledge with cognitive maps and cognitive graphs. Trends in cognitive sciences, 25(1), 37-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.004
Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Scott, J. (2012). What is social network analysis? Bloomsbury Academic. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.2.1.2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bogumila Gierus, Brent Davis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their papers, including publishing and commercial rights. Attribution should be given to EPIGREP when publishing a previously published article in another venue, including personal websites and blogs.
Copyright information for readers can be found here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0