Critical discourse analysis in transcultural spaces
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is an analytical framework developed for studying power and inequalities as manifested in language in contemporary capitalist society (Fairclough, 2010). CDA examines evidence of unequal power relations in discursive events (Fairclough, 2003)and shows the role of discourse in constructing the social world, social identities and influences in social change (Fairclough, 1992). “Critical” suggests that power struggles exist in society, so CDA aims to expose ideological features of discourse (Fairclough, 2010, p. 4). This article provides a brief overview of CDA and discusses its specific characteristics in relation to the authors’ doctoral research. The first author is applying CDA to an examination of language change, specifically in regard to taboo language and swearing at secondary schools and the second author is using CDA in an exploration of soft skills in workplace communication. The article also examines the personal reflections of the authors on how the emerging transcultural experience in Brisbane, Australia, on the 2017 International Doctoral Seminar and Conference has benefited their individual journeys, their knowledge of CDA as well as their prospective research.
Adams, M. (2016). In praise of profanity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Aghaee, N., & Hansson, H. (2013). Peer portal: Quality enhancement in thesis writing using self-managed peer review on a mass scale. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 186- 203.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings.
Arthur, R. (2012). You will die: The burden of modern taboos. Washington, USA: Feral House.
Atkinson, R. (2007). The life story interview as a bridge in narrative inquiry. In D.J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 1-21).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Bergen, B., K. (2016). What the F: What swearing reveals about our language, our brains, and ourselves. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Blommaert, J. (1997). Whose background? Comments on a discourse-analytic
reconstruction of the Warsaw Uprising. Pragmatics, 7(1):69-81.
Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493-
Chirico, R. (2014). Damn!: A cultural history of swearing in modern America. Chicago: Pitchstone Publishing.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
De Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.
Dean, D. (Producer). (2018, May 6). The fate of the common good [Audio podcast].
Retrieved from goo.gl/a9ppFf
Department of Education and Training. (2015). School disciplinary absences. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/statistics/absences.html
Doherty, C., Berwick, A., & McGregor, R. (2016). Swearing in Class: Sociolinguistic morality in dispute. Paper presented at the AARE, Melbourne, Australia.
Dunne, M., Pryor, J., & Yates, J. (2005). Becoming a researcher: A research companion for the social sciences. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Enfield, N. (2016) Swearing demographics. The Project.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Guo, S. (2015). The colour of skill: contesting a racialized regime of skill from the
experience of recent immigrants in Canada. Studies in Continuing Education, 37(3), 236-250. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2015.1067766
Jay, T. (1992). Cursing in America: A psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, in the movies, in the schoolyards and on the streets. Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Lee, A. & Otsuji, E. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and the problem of methodology. In T. Le & M. Short (Eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1 – 14). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Ljung, M. (2011). Swearing: A cross-cultural linguistic study. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
McEnery, T. (2005). Swearing in English. Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mohr, M. (2013). Holy Shit. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Moore, J. (2005). Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level: A guide for change agents. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 326-339.
Rampton, B. (2001). Critique in interaction. Critique of Anthropology, 21(1), 83-107.
Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365-416.
Sawyer, K. (2002). A discourse on discourse: An archaeological history of an intellectual concept. Cultural Studies, 16(3), 433-456.
Schegloff, E. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), 99-128.
Simon, L., & Greenberg, J. (1996). Further progress in understanding the effects of derogatory ethnic labels: The role of pre-existing attitudes towards the targeted group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1195-1204.
Slimbach, R. (2005). The Transcultural Journey. The Interdisciplinary Journal of
Study Abroad, 11, 205-230. Retrieved from goo.gl/B3uCZc
Staples, S. (2015). Examining the linguistic needs of internationally educated nurses:
A corpus-based study of lexico-grammatical features in nurse-patient interactions. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 122-136. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2014.09.002
Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A Critical Discourse Analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7-49.
Valle, S. D. (2003). Language Rights and the Law in the United States. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucalgary-
Windsor, C., Douglas, C., & Harvey, T. (2011). Nursing and competencies - a natural
fit: the politics of skill/competency formation in nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 19(3), 213-222. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00549.x
Widdowson, H.G. (1995). Discourse analysis: a critical view. Language and
Literature, 4(3), 157 - 172.
Wodak, R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium &
D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (197-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 1-33). London: Sage.
Wodak, R. (2012). Language, power and identity. Language Teaching, 45 (2) 15-233. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000048
Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. In K.
Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1-14). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Xu, Y., Gutierrez, A., & Kim, S. H. (2008). Adaptation and transformation through
(un)learning lived experiences of immigrant Chinese nurses in U.S. healthcare environment. Advances in Nursing Science, 31, E33-E47. doi: 10.1097/01.ANS.0000319570.99254.e5
How to Cite
Authors retain copyright of their papers, including publishing and commercial rights. Attribution should be given to EPIGREP when publishing a previously published article in another venue, including personal websites and blogs.
Copyright information for readers can be found here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0