Comment les établissements d'enseignement supérieur évaluent-ils et mettent-ils en œuvre leur mission sociale ? Un protocole d'une étude de portée
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.36834/sxbqck41Références
1. Jongbloed B, Enders J, Salerno C. Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. High Educ 2008;56(3):303-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2
2. Lotz-Sisitka H, Wals AEJ, Kronlid D, McGarry D. Transformative, transgressive social learning: rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2015;16:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018
3. World Health Organization. Towards unity for health: challenges and opportunities for partnership in health development: a working paper / Boelen C. 2000. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66566
4. Dubé TV. An imperative for transforming health professions education. Med Educ 2024;58(1):8-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15274
5. Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. Future of Medical Education in Canada 2020. 2020. https://afmc.ca/en/projects-resources/future-of-medical-education-of-canada-fmec
6. Boelen C, Pearson D, Kaufman A, et al. Producing a socially accountable medical school: AMEE Guide No. 109. Med Teach 2016;38(11):1078-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1219029
7. Committee on Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools. CACMS standards and elements: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree. 2021.
8. Canadian Residency Accreditation Consortium. 2019. http://www.canrac.ca/canrac/about-e
9. Gibbons M. Science's new social contract with society. Nature 1999;402(Suppl 6761):C81-C84. https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576
10. Ellaway R, Van Roy K, Preston R, et al. Translating medical school social missions to student experiences. Med Educ 2018;52(2):171-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13417
11. Morley CP, Mader EM, Smilnak T, et al. The social mission in medical school mission statements: associations with graduate outcomes. Fam Med 2015;47(6):427-434.
12. Ross BM, Cameron E. Socially accountable medical education: our story might not be yours. High Educ Stud 2021;11(1):114-120. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n1p114
13. Batra S, Orban J, Guterbock T, et al. Social mission metrics: developing a survey to guide health professions schools. Acad Med 2020;95(12):1811-1816. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003324
14. Boelen C, Dharamsi S, Gibbs T. The social accountability of medical schools and its indicators. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2012;25(3):180-194. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.109785
15. Reeve C, Woolley T, Ross SJ, et al. The impact of socially-accountable health professional education: a systematic review of the literature. Med Teach 2017;39(1):67-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1231914
16. Dharamsi S, Ho A, Spadafora SM, Woollard R. The physician as health advocate: translating the quest for social responsibility into medical education and practice. Acad Med 2011;86(9):1108-1113. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226b43b
17. Dubé TV, Cumyn A, Fourati M, et al. Pathways, journeys and experiences: integrating curricular activities related to social accountability within an undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ 2024;58(5):556-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15260
18. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010;376(9756):1923-1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5
19. Strasser R, Hogenbirk J, Jacklin K, et al. Community engagement: a central feature of NOSM's socially accountable distributed medical education. Can Med Educ J 2018;9(1):e33-e43. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.42151
20. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8(1):19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
21. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
22. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
23. Oubouchou R, Massé J, Zaccagnini M, et al. Reimagining social accountability in health professions education: unlocking impact through evidence-informed approaches. 2026. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TE69U
24. Barber C, Chahine S, Leppink J, van der Vleuten C. Global perceptions on social accountability and outcomes: a survey of medical schools. Teach Learn Med 2023;35(5):527-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2022.2103815
25. Batra S, Orban J, Zhang H, et al. Analysis of social mission commitment at dental, medical, and nursing schools in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5(5):e2210900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10900
26. Blouin D. Accreditation of Canadian undergraduate medical education programs: a study of measures of effectiveness. Acad Med 2020;95(6):931-937. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003065
27. Orban J, Xue C, Raichur S, et al. The scope of social mission content in health professions education accreditation standards. Acad Med 2022;97(1):111-120. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004437
28. Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ 2009;43(9):887-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x
29. Pollock D, Peters M, Khalil H, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(3):520-532. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123
30. Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med 2017;92(2):161-166. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452
31. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169(7):467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
32. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
33. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: SAGE Publications; 2021. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46
34. Kothari A, McCutcheon C, Graham ID, for the IKT Research Network. Defining integrated knowledge translation and moving forward: a response to recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag 2017;6(5):299-300. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15
35. Jordan J, Shah K, Phillips AW, et al. Use of the "stepback" method for education research consultation at the national level: a pilot study. AEM Educ Train 2019;3(4):347-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10349
36. Zaccagnini M, Cameron E, Strasser R, et al. Unpacking educational approaches for social accountability in health professions education: a scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10494-9
37. Zaccagnini M, Maggio LA, St-Onge C, Dubé TV. Reprioritising consultation in scoping reviews: Clarifying purposes and practices. Med Educ 2026.
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Randa Oubouchou, Julie Massé, Marco Zaccagnini, Linda Bergeron, David Rojas, Marie-Claude Tremblay , Erin Cameron, Allison Brown, Tim Dubé 2025
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
La soumission d’un manuscrit original à la revue constitue une indication qu’il s’agit d’un travail original, qu’il n’a jamais été publié et qu’il n’est pas envisagé pour publication dans une autre revue. S’il est accepté, il sera publié en ligne et ne pourra l’être ailleurs sous la même forme, à des fins commerciales, dans quelque langue que ce soit, sans l’accord de l’éditeur.
La publication d’une recherche scientifique a pour but la diffusion de connaissances et, sous un régime sans but lucratif, ne profite financièrement ni à l’éditeur ni à l’auteur.
Les auteurs qui publient dans la Revue canadienne d’éducation médicale acceptent de publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Paternité - Pas d’utilisation commerciale, Pas de modification 4.0 Canada. Cette licence permet à quiconque de télécharger et de partager l’article à des fins non commerciales, à condition d’en attribuer le crédit aux auteurs. Pour plus de détails sur les droits que les auteurs accordent aux utilisateurs de leur travail, veuillez consulter le résumé de la licence et la licence complète.
