Scholarly activity in Canadian Residency Matching Service criteria: do Canadian programs really care about applicant research?
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80936Résumé
Background: Residency programs across Canada evaluate applicants based on written applications, reference letters, and interviews. One key factor many institutions consider is “scholarly activity.” To improve transparency, the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) recently revised its program description pages, adding a dedicated section outlining expectations for research and academic work. This study examines whether these changes have made program criteria clearer for applicants.
Methods: For all 17 Canadian faculties of medicine, 2023 R1 entry, —internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, general surgery, psychiatry and anesthesiology—program descriptions were reviewed on the CaRMS website, looking for keywords related to scholarly activity.
Results: Although most residency programs now include scholarly activity in their CaRMS descriptions, several programs provide vague descriptions of this requirement. In 2023, nearly all family medicine (94%), internal medicine (100%), and pediatrics (100%) program descriptions referenced requiring or considering scholarly work as part of their selection process—up from 41%, 65%, and 71% in 2019. Programs commonly mentioned scholarly activity in two or three sections of their selection criteria, with key themes including active scholarly work, scholarly deliverables, and future scholarly potential.
Conclusion: Canadian medical schools should set clearer expectations for scholarly activity in residency applications to ensure transparency and equal opportunities for all applicants. Programs could also explain why research matters—whether as a core component of training or to develop critical thinking and initiative. Greater clarity would help applicants see research as more than just a “check-the-box” requirement, fostering genuine engagement in scholarly work.
Téléchargements
Références
1. Canadian Resident Matching Service. CaRMS data and reports. 2010. Available at https://www.carms.ca/pdfs/2010R1_MatchResults/Summary%20of%20Match%20Results_en.pdf [Accessed on Jul 2025]
2. Canadian Residency Matching Service. R-1 main residency match. 2023. Available at https://www.carms.ca/match/r-1-main-residency-match/ [Accessed on Feb 2024]
3. Lukings J, Bell A, Stobbe K, et al. Scholarly activity as a selection criterion in the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS): a review of published criteria by internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics programs. Can Med Educ J. 2020 Jul 15;11(3):e116–21. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.69094
4. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The CanMEDS framework. Available at https://www.royalcollege.ca/en/standards-and-accreditation/canmeds.html [Accessed on Oct 2024]
5. Lakoff J, Cofie N, Dalgarno N, Howse K, Heeneman S. Analysis of factors affecting Canadian medical students’ success in the residency match. Can Med Educ J. 2020 Apr 21;11(3):e43-e55. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.68981
6. Chang Y, Ramnanan CJ. A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research experiences, attitudes, and outcomes. Acad Med. 2015; 90:1162-1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000702
7. Melendez MM, Xu X, Sexton TR, Shapiro MJ, Mohan EP. The importance of basic science and clinical research as a selection criterion for general surgery residency programs. J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar;65(2):151–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.08.009
8. Bernstein AD, Jazrawi LM, Elbeshbeshy B, Della Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 61(1–2):49–57. Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12828380/ [Accessed on Jun 2023]
9. Green M, Jones P, Thomas JX. Selection criteria for residency: results of a national program directors survey. Acad Med. 2009 Mar;84(3):362–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970c6b
10. Gorouhi F, Alikhan A, Rezaei A, Fazel N. Dermatology residency selection criteria with an emphasis on program characteristics: a national program director survey. Dermatol Res Pract. 2014;2014:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/692760
11. National Resident Matching Program Data Release and Research Committee. Results of the 2014 NRMP program director survey. 2014. Available at https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/PD-Survey-Report-2014.pdf [Accessed on Oct 2024]
12. Chambers LW, Bell A, Weera S. More research needed to understand medical students’ shift from exclusively clinical to scholarship. Healthy Debate. 2023 Jul. Available at https://healthydebate.ca/2023/07/topic/medicalstudents- clinical-scholarship/ [Accessed on November 2024]
13. Rinard JR, Garol BD, Shenoy AB, Mahabir RC. Successfully matching into surgical specialties: an analysis of national resident matching program data. J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep 1;2(3):316–21. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-09-00020.1
14. Pathipati AS, Taleghani N. Research in Medical School: A survey evaluating why medical students take research years. Cureus. 2016 Aug 18; https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.741
15. Beres A, Baird R, Puligandla PS. Success in the pediatric surgery match: a survey of the 2010 applicant pool. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 May;46(5):957–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.030
16. Gupta R, Norris ML, Barrowman N, Writer H. Pre-residency publication and its association with paediatric residency match outcome—a retrospective analysis of a national database. Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Nov 13;6(6):388–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-017-0383-8
17. Simpson D, Yarris LM, Carek PJ. Defining the scholarly and scholarship common program requirements. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):539–40. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00326
18. Philibert I, Lieh-Lai M, Miller R, Potts JR, Brigham T, Nasca TJ. Scholarly activity in the next accreditation system: moving from structure and process to outcomes. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):714–7. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-05-04-43
19. Ledford CJW, Seehusen DA, Villagran MM, Cafferty LA, Childress MA. Resident scholarship expectations and experiences: sources of uncertainty as barriers to success. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):564–9. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00280.1
20. Robbins L, Bostrom M, Marx R, Roberts T, Sculco TP. Restructuring the orthopedic resident research curriculum to increase scholarly activity. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):646–51. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00303.1
21. Stoklosa K, Mazine A, Forgie K, et al. Opening the CaRMS black box: the importance of various aspects of the CaRMS application for cardiac surgery applicants. Can J Cardiol. 2021 Oct;37(10):S38–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.07.082
22. Cirone KD, Akrout M, Pur DR, Vender R. Research productivity among Canadian first year dermatology residents: A 15 year analysis. JAAD Int. 2023 Dec;13:181–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2023.09.001
23. Pak JS, Pagano MJ, Cooper KL, McKiernan JM, Badalato GM. Prevalence of research publication misrepresentation among urology residency applicants and its effect on match success. J Urol. 2017 Jan;99:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.055
24. Kistka HM, Nayeri A, Wang L, Dow J, Chandrasekhar R, Chambless LB. Publication misrepresentation among neurosurgery residency applicants: an increasing problem. J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):193–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS141990
25. Sater L, Schwartz JS, Coupland S, Young M, Nguyen LHP. Nationwide study of publication misrepresentation in applicants to residency. Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):601–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12729
26. Blackwell T. Nearly one in four Canadian medical grads may be fudging claims of being published on their resumes: study. National Post. 2015 Jun 3. Available at https://nationalpost.com/health/nearly-one-in-four-canadian-medical-grads-may-be-fudging-claims-on-of-being-published-on-their-resumes [Accessed on Oct 2024]
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Asil El Galad, Hanna Van Dierdonck, Nikesh Chander, Caleb Mathai, Alyssa Palmateer, Shenna Dunn, Seddiq Weera, Larry W Chambers, Amanda Bell 2025
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
La soumission d’un manuscrit original à la revue constitue une indication qu’il s’agit d’un travail original, qu’il n’a jamais été publié et qu’il n’est pas envisagé pour publication dans une autre revue. S’il est accepté, il sera publié en ligne et ne pourra l’être ailleurs sous la même forme, à des fins commerciales, dans quelque langue que ce soit, sans l’accord de l’éditeur.
La publication d’une recherche scientifique a pour but la diffusion de connaissances et, sous un régime sans but lucratif, ne profite financièrement ni à l’éditeur ni à l’auteur.
Les auteurs qui publient dans la Revue canadienne d’éducation médicale acceptent de publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Paternité - Pas d’utilisation commerciale, Pas de modification 4.0 Canada. Cette licence permet à quiconque de télécharger et de partager l’article à des fins non commerciales, à condition d’en attribuer le crédit aux auteurs. Pour plus de détails sur les droits que les auteurs accordent aux utilisateurs de leur travail, veuillez consulter le résumé de la licence et la licence complète.
