Revealing the blind spots: five key challenges for advancing physician wellness
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80720Résumé
Physician wellness is a critical yet unresolved challenge in medical education. Burnout, emotional distress, and systemic barriers undermine the sustainability of the healthcare workforce, with negative consequences for both physicians and patients. Despite widespread recognition, existing interventions often fall short, hindered by fragmented approaches and resistance to change. This article identifies five key challenges that will need to be overcome if we are to make meaningful progress in advancing physician wellness: (1) inconsistent definitions and flawed methodologies in assessing wellness, (2) overemphasis on individual-focused interventions, (3) the absence of unified, evidence-based frameworks, (4) ethical and methodological problems with wellness surveys, and (5) the commercialization of wellness. Each challenge represents deeply ingrained barriers within healthcare institutions that impede meaningful progress. I advocate for a paradigm shift toward evidence-based, systems-level strategies, focusing on Canadian and US medical education. By integrating theoretical frameworks like Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the Job Demands-Resources (JDR) model into accreditation standards and institutional practices, healthcare organizations can address the root causes of physician distress.
Références
1. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(18):1377-1385. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199
2. Demerouti E, Nachreiner F, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
3. Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
4. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388(10057). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X
5. Todres M, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical education research remains the poor relation. Br Med J. 2007;335(7615). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39253.544688.94
6. Hope D, Dewar A, Hay C. Is there a replication crisis in medical education research? Acad Med. 2021;96(7). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004063
7. Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674
8. Neufeld A, Kassam A. Why respect for learner autonomy is an ethical priority. Clin Teach. 2025;22(e70062):1-5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70062
9. Fendel JC, Bürkle JJ, Göritz AS. Mindfulness-based interventions to reduce burnout and stress in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2021;96(5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003936
10. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
11. Su YL, Reeve J. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011;23(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7
12. Kevern T, Davies DR, Stiel K, Raaum S. Impact of opt-out therapy appointments on resident physicians’ mental health, well-being, stigma, and willingness to engage. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(6). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00898.1
13. Wieneke K, Birkland B, Kruse G, Priestley M, Teal D, West C. Charting a new path forward in addressing employee well-being in health care. In: Elsevier Inc on behalf of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.11.018
14. Shanafelt TD, Larson D, Bohman B, et al. Organization-Wide Approaches to Foster Effective Unit-Level Efforts to Improve Clinician Well-Being. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023;98(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.10.031
15. Higgins E, Wingert T, Duggan E, Mansolf M, Carcamo J, Park C. Measuring well-being influencers: development and validation of the WISH Inventory. Anesthesia. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005401
16. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME common program requirements (residency). 2024. Available from . https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/2025-prs/cprresidency_2025.pdf. [Accessed Mar 9, 2025].
17. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General standards of accreditation for residency programs. 2020. Available from https://www.royalcollege.ca/content/dam/documents/accreditation/competence-by-design/non-resource-documents/canera/general-standards-accreditation-for-residency-programs-e.html. [Accessed Mar 9, 2025].
18. Brafford A, Ellis B, Guldner G, et al. A multi-wave study of factors associated with resident engagement, depression, burnout, and stay intent. HCA Healthc J Med. 2024;5(3). https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1837
19. Adams M, Willett LL, Wahi-Gururaj S, Halvorsen AJ, Angus S V. Usefulness of the ACGME resident survey: A view from internal medicine program directors. Am J Med. 2014;127(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.010
20. Appelbaum NP, Santen SA, Vota S, Wingfield L, Sabo R, Yaghmour N. Threats to reliability and validity with resident wellness surveying efforts. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(5). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00216.1
21. Mattson C, Bushardt RL, Artino AR. “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(1). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-01492.1
22. Linzer M, Poplau S, Prasad K, et al. Characteristics of health care organizations associated with clinician trust: results from the healthy work place study. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6201
23. Dyrbye LN, Gill PR, Satele D V., West CP. Professional coaching and surgeon well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2023;277(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005678
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Adam Neufeld 2025
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
La soumission d’un manuscrit original à la revue constitue une indication qu’il s’agit d’un travail original, qu’il n’a jamais été publié et qu’il n’est pas envisagé pour publication dans une autre revue. S’il est accepté, il sera publié en ligne et ne pourra l’être ailleurs sous la même forme, à des fins commerciales, dans quelque langue que ce soit, sans l’accord de l’éditeur.
La publication d’une recherche scientifique a pour but la diffusion de connaissances et, sous un régime sans but lucratif, ne profite financièrement ni à l’éditeur ni à l’auteur.
Les auteurs qui publient dans la Revue canadienne d’éducation médicale acceptent de publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Paternité - Pas d’utilisation commerciale, Pas de modification 4.0 Canada. Cette licence permet à quiconque de télécharger et de partager l’article à des fins non commerciales, à condition d’en attribuer le crédit aux auteurs. Pour plus de détails sur les droits que les auteurs accordent aux utilisateurs de leur travail, veuillez consulter le résumé de la licence et la licence complète.
