The timing of booster sessions may not improve resuscitation skill retention among healthcare providers: a randomized controlled trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.74401Abstract
Introduction: Booster sessions can improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention among healthcare providers; however, the optimal timing of these sessions is unknown. This study aimed to explore differences in skill retention based on booster session timing.
Methods: After ethics approval, healthcare providers who completed an initial CPR training course were randomly assigned to either an early booster, late booster, or no booster group. Participants’ mean resuscitation scores, time to initiate compressions, and time to successfully provide defibrillation were assessed immediately post-course and four months later using linear mixed models.
Results: Seventy-three healthcare professionals were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences by randomization in the immediate post-test (9.7, 9.2, 8.9) or retention test (10.2, 9.8, and 9.5) resuscitation scores. No significant effects were observed for time to compression. Post-test time to defibrillation (mean ± SE: 112.8 ± 3.0 sec) was significantly faster compared to retention (mean ± SE: 120.4 ± 2.7 sec) (p = 0.04); however, the effect did not vary by randomization.
Conclusion: No difference was observed in resuscitation skill retention between the early, late, and no booster groups. More research is needed to determine the aspects of a booster session beyond timing that contribute to skill retention.
Metrics
References
Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132(18):S414–35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259
Monsieurs KRG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation 2015;95:1–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.028
Meaney PA, Bobrow BJ, Mancini ME, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2013;128(4):417–35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654
Stiell IG, Brown SP, Nichol G, Davis DP. What is the role of chest compression depth during out of hospital. Crit Care Med 2013;40(4):1192–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc8bb DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc8bb
American Heart Association. CPR facts & stats [Internet]. 2021 Available from https://cpr.heart.org/en/resources/cpr-facts-and-stats [Accessed on Dec 6, 2021].
Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2015;43(4):840–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000824
Hamilton R. Nurses’ knowledge and skill retention following cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2005;51(3):288–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03491.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03491.x
Hunt EA, Fiedor-Hamilton M, Eppich WJ. Resuscitation education: narrowing the gap between evidence-based resuscitation guidelines and performance using best educational practices. Pediatr Clin North Am 2008;55(4):1025–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.007
Oermann MH, Kardong-Edgren SE, Odom-Maryon T. Competence in CPR. Am J Nurs 2012;112(5):43–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000414320.71954.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000414320.71954.34
Yang CW, Yen ZS, McGowan JE, et al. A systematic review of retention of adult advanced life support knowledge and skills in healthcare providers. Resuscitation [Internet] 2012;83(9):1055–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.027
Bhanji F, Finn JC, Lockey A, et al. Part 8: education, implementation, and teams: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2015;132:S242–68. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000277
Wolfe H, Maltese M, Niles D, et al. Blood pressure directed booster trainings improve intensive care unit provider retention of excellent CPR skills. Pediatr Emerg Care 2015;31(11):743–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000394
Sutton RM, Niles D, Meaney PA, et al. Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Peds 2011;128(1). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105
Kardong-Edgren S, Oermann MH, Jastrzembski TS, et al. Baseline cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill performance of nursing students is improved after one resuscitation quality improvement skill refresher. J Nurses Prof Dev 2020;36(2):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000614
Niles DE, Nishisaki A, Sutton RM, et al. Improved retention of chest compression psychomotor skills with brief “rolling refresher” training. Simul Healthc 2017;12(4):213–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000228
16. Schunk D. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. 6th ed. London, United Kingdom: Pearson; 2011.
Anderson R, Sebaldt A, Lin Y, Cheng A. Optimal training frequency for acquisition and retention of high-quality CPR skills: a randomized trial. Resuscitation 2019;135(October 2018):153–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.033
Bender J, Kennally K, Shields R, Overly F. Does simulation booster impact retention of resuscitation procedural skills and teamwork? J Perinatol 2014;34(9):664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.72
Kaczorowski K, Levitt C, Hammond M, et al. Retention of neonatal resuscitation skills and knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Med 1998;30(10):705–11.
Rohrer D, Pashler H. Increasing retention without increasing study time. Educ. 2007;132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00500.x
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):672–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Available at https://cpr.heartandstroke.ca/ [Accessed Mar 31, 2019].
Li Q, Zhou R hua, Liu J, et al. Pre-training evaluation and feedback improved skills retention of basic life support in medical students. Resuscitation 2013;84(9):1274–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.017
Lauridsen KG, Løfgren B, Brogaard L, Paltved C, Hvidman L, Krogh K. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for healthcare professionals. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc 2021;Publish Ah(00):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000608
Kemery S, Kelly K, Wilson C, Wheeler CA. Brief bedside refresher training to practice cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills in the ambulatory surgery center setting. J Contin Educ Nurs 2015;46(8):370–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20150721-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20150721-04
Matterson HH, Szyld D, Green BR, et al. Neonatal resuscitation experience curves: simulation based mastery learning booster sessions and skill decay patterns among pediatric residents. J Perinat Med 2018;46(8):934–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0330
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Richard Waldolf, Pierre-Marc Dion, Dylan Bould, Chilombo Bould, Agnes Crnic, Cole Etherington, Graeme McBride, Sylvain Boet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
