Revealing the blind spots: five key challenges for advancing physician wellness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80720Abstract
Physician wellness is a critical yet unresolved challenge in medical education. Burnout, emotional distress, and systemic barriers undermine the sustainability of the healthcare workforce, with negative consequences for both physicians and patients. Despite widespread recognition, existing interventions often fall short, hindered by fragmented approaches and resistance to change. This article identifies five key challenges that will need to be overcome if we are to make meaningful progress in advancing physician wellness: (1) inconsistent definitions and flawed methodologies in assessing wellness, (2) overemphasis on individual-focused interventions, (3) the absence of unified, evidence-based frameworks, (4) ethical and methodological problems with wellness surveys, and (5) the commercialization of wellness. Each challenge represents deeply ingrained barriers within healthcare institutions that impede meaningful progress. I advocate for a paradigm shift toward evidence-based, systems-level strategies, focusing on Canadian and US medical education. By integrating theoretical frameworks like Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the Job Demands-Resources (JDR) model into accreditation standards and institutional practices, healthcare organizations can address the root causes of physician distress.
References
1. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(18):1377-1385. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199
2. Demerouti E, Nachreiner F, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
3. Ryan R, Deci E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
4. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388(10057). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X
5. Todres M, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical education research remains the poor relation. Br Med J. 2007;335(7615). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39253.544688.94
6. Hope D, Dewar A, Hay C. Is there a replication crisis in medical education research? Acad Med. 2021;96(7). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004063
7. Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674
8. Neufeld A, Kassam A. Why respect for learner autonomy is an ethical priority. Clin Teach. 2025;22(e70062):1-5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70062
9. Fendel JC, Bürkle JJ, Göritz AS. Mindfulness-based interventions to reduce burnout and stress in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2021;96(5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003936
10. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
11. Su YL, Reeve J. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011;23(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7
12. Kevern T, Davies DR, Stiel K, Raaum S. Impact of opt-out therapy appointments on resident physicians’ mental health, well-being, stigma, and willingness to engage. J Grad Med Educ. 2023;15(6). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00898.1
13. Wieneke K, Birkland B, Kruse G, Priestley M, Teal D, West C. Charting a new path forward in addressing employee well-being in health care. In: Elsevier Inc on behalf of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research; 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.11.018
14. Shanafelt TD, Larson D, Bohman B, et al. Organization-Wide Approaches to Foster Effective Unit-Level Efforts to Improve Clinician Well-Being. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023;98(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.10.031
15. Higgins E, Wingert T, Duggan E, Mansolf M, Carcamo J, Park C. Measuring well-being influencers: development and validation of the WISH Inventory. Anesthesia. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005401
16. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME common program requirements (residency). 2024. Available from . https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/2025-prs/cprresidency_2025.pdf. [Accessed Mar 9, 2025].
17. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General standards of accreditation for residency programs. 2020. Available from https://www.royalcollege.ca/content/dam/documents/accreditation/competence-by-design/non-resource-documents/canera/general-standards-accreditation-for-residency-programs-e.html. [Accessed Mar 9, 2025].
18. Brafford A, Ellis B, Guldner G, et al. A multi-wave study of factors associated with resident engagement, depression, burnout, and stay intent. HCA Healthc J Med. 2024;5(3). https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1837
19. Adams M, Willett LL, Wahi-Gururaj S, Halvorsen AJ, Angus S V. Usefulness of the ACGME resident survey: A view from internal medicine program directors. Am J Med. 2014;127(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.010
20. Appelbaum NP, Santen SA, Vota S, Wingfield L, Sabo R, Yaghmour N. Threats to reliability and validity with resident wellness surveying efforts. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(5). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00216.1
21. Mattson C, Bushardt RL, Artino AR. “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(1). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-01492.1
22. Linzer M, Poplau S, Prasad K, et al. Characteristics of health care organizations associated with clinician trust: results from the healthy work place study. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6201
23. Dyrbye LN, Gill PR, Satele D V., West CP. Professional coaching and surgeon well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2023;277(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005678
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adam Neufeld
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
