A phenomenological study of resident and faculty experiences with learner engagement in the normalization of workplace-based assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.76192

Abstract

Background: Workplace-based assessments (WPBA) have become integral to learner-centred medical education. As previous research has linked learner engagement to WPBA implementation, this study explores residents’ and faculty members’ experiences with learner engagement in the normalisation of WPBA practice.

Methods: Transcendental phenomenology was used as the qualitative approach, focusing on the participants’ lived experiences. A semi-structured interview guide was used to interview five faculty members and five residents who had conducted WPBA. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using phenomenological data analysis.

Results: Three themes were identified between learner engagement and WPBA conduct: (a) work environment, (b) roles and relationships, and (c) mutually beneficial teaching and learning. WPBA learner engagement occurred when participants interacted with each other and with the clinical setting to facilitate teaching and learning. Both participant groups reported a desire to participate in WPBA, but time constraints at times hindered participation. The residents indicated that WPBA improved their knowledge and admitted to experiencing negative emotions during the assessment. Overall, participants recognised the reciprocal benefits of WPBA participation for their professional development.

Conclusion: The findings of the study suggest that learner engagement influences the use of WPBA. Consequently, it may be beneficial to consider the role of learner engagement to normalise WPBA application for teaching and learning in the clinical context.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Cate OT. Competency-based postgraduate medical education: past, present and future. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34(5):Doc69. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001146

Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan MK, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):609–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082

Earl L, Steven Katz, Campbell G, et al. Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Crown in right of the Governments of Alberta. 2006;112. Available from: https://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/assess/wncp/full_doc.pdf [Accessed Sept 24, 2020].

Jenkins CE. The relationship between formative assessment and student engagement at Walters State Community College. ProQuest LLC. [Tennessee]: East Tennessee State University; 2010. Available from: https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3034&context=etd [Accessed Jun 9, 2022].

Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007 Jan;29(9–10):855–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701775453

Stiggins R. From formative assessment to assessment for learning: a path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan. 2005 Dec;87(4):324–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414

Reschly AL, Pohl AJ, Christenson SL, SpringerLink. Student engagement effective academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective interventions at school. 1st ed. 2020. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. xix+331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9

Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies Higher Educ. 2013 Jun;38(5):758–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. review of educational research. 2004 Mar 1;74(1):59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Dijksterhuis MGK, Schuwirth LWT, Braat DDM, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors’ perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013 Aug;35(8):e1396–402. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.756576

Barrett A, Galvin R, Scherpbier AJJA, Teunissen PW, O’Shaughnessy A, Horgan M. Is the learning value of workplace-based assessment being realised? A qualitative study of trainer and trainee perceptions and experiences. Postgrad Med J. 2017 Mar;93(1097):138–42. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133917

Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Nouns ZM, et al. The educational impact of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) and its association with implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang Q, editor. PLoS ONE. 2018 Jun 4;13(6):1–15. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198009

Spike N, Alexander H, Elliott S, et al. In-training assessment - its potential in enhancing clinical teaching. Med Educ. 2000 Oct;34(10):858–61. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00755.x

Billett S. Toward a workplace pedagogy: guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Educ Quart. 2002 Nov 1;53(1):27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171302237202

Prentice S, Benson J, Kirkpatrick E, Schuwirth L. Workplace-based assessments in postgraduate medical education: a hermeneutic review. Med Educ. 2020 Nov;54(11):981–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14221

Andreassen P, Malling B. How are formative assessment methods used in the clinical setting? A qualitative study. Int J Med Educ. 2019 Nov 22;10:208–15. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5db3.62e3

Ali J, Goh A. Student perceptions of workplace-based assessment. Clin Teach. 2017;14(5):319–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12588

Acai A, Li SA, Sherbino J, Chan TM. Attending emergency physicians’ perceptions of a programmatic workplace-based assessment system: the McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP). Teach Learn Med. 2019 Aug 8;31(4):434–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2019.1574581

Harlen W, James M. Assessment and Learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assess Educ: Princ Policy Pract. 1997 Nov;4(3):365–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594970040304

Liang Y, Noble LM. Chinese doctors’ views on workplace-based assessment: trainee and supervisor perspectives of the mini-CEX. Med Educ Online. 2021;26(1):1869393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1869393

Jones A. Bridging the implementation gap: normalisation process theory in educational settings. 2017 Apr 15; Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316666078_Bridging_the_implementation_gap_normalization_process_theory_in_educational_settings

Massie J, Ali J. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2015 May 24;21(2):455–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0

Persaud D, Cole J, Jainarine R, Khalid Z. Internal medicine residency program in Guyana: a collaborative model for sustainable graduate medical education in resource-limited settings. Front Public Health. 2017 May 29;5:112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00112

Etheridge L, Boursicott K. Performance and workplace assessment. In: A practical guide for medical teachers. 4th ed. London; New York: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2013. p. 307–14. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/a-practical-guide-for-medical-teachers/dent/978-0-7020-8170-5

McQueen SA, Petrisor B, Bhandari M, Fahim C, McKinnon V, Sonnadara RR. Examining the barriers to meaningful assessment and feedback in medical training. Amer J Surg. 2016 Feb;211(2):464–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.002

Husserl E. Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012;434 p. Available from: https://www.routledge.com/Ideas-General-Introduction-to-Pure-Phenomenology/Husserl/p/book/9780415519038#:~:text=The%20publication%20of%20Ideas%20in,the%20essence%20of%20consciousness%22%20itself. [Accessed on Mar 22, 2023].

Vagle MD. Crafting phenomenological research. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge; 2018. 214 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315173474

Streubert HS, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.

Smith DW. Phenomenology. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. 2018th ed. Stanford, California: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University; 2018. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/. [Accessed On Feb 18, 2021].

Englander M. The interview: data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. J Phenomenol Psychol. 2012;43(1):13–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916212X632943

Peoples K. How to write a phenomenological dissertation: a step-by-step guide. 1 edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2020. 192 p. Available from: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/how-to-write-a-phenomenological-dissertation/book261976

Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O’Brien BC, Rees CE. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Zoom. San Jose, California; 2021. Available from: https://zoom.us/

Fleming J. Recognizing and resolving the challenges of being an insider researcher in work-integrated learning. International J Work-Integ Learn. 2018;19(3):311–20. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1196753.pdf [Accessed on Mar 22, 2023].

Hycner RH. Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies. 1985;8:279–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142995

Ortlipp M. Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report. 2008 Dec 1;13(4):695–705. Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/8

Javadi M, Zarea K. Understanding thematic analysis and its pitfall. J Clie Care. 2016;1(1):34–40. https://doi.org/10.15412/J.JCC.02010107

Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ. 2008 Aug 7;337:a1035. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1035

Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th edition. London ; New York: Routledge; 2017. 944 p. Available from: https://www.routledge.com/Research-Methods-in-Education/Cohen-Manion-Morrison/p/book/9781138209886

May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. SAGE Publications. 2009;43(3):535–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509103208

McNaughton RJ, Steven A, Shucksmith J. Using normalization process theory as a practical tool across the life course of a qualitative research project. Qual Health Res. 2020 Jan 1;30(2):217–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319863420

Wood P. Overcoming the problem of embedding change in educational organizations: a perspective from normalization process theory. Manag Educ. 2017 Jan;31(1):33–8 https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616685286

Harris P, Bhanji F, Topps M, et al. Evolving concepts of assessment in a competency-based world. Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):603–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315071

Konopasek L, Norcini J, Krupat E. Focusing on the formative: building an assessment system aimed at student growth and development. Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1492–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001171

Downloads

Published

2024-04-09

How to Cite

1.
Mc Donald M, Muir F. A phenomenological study of resident and faculty experiences with learner engagement in the normalization of workplace-based assessment . Can. Med. Ed. J [Internet]. 2024 Apr. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 17];. Available from: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/76192

Issue

Section

Original Research