A Systems-Inspired Taxonomy of SoTL Research: Increasing the Accessibility and Visibility of this Heterogeneous Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.55Keywords:
student learning, teaching, research, context, higher education, knowledge organizationAbstract
The scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is a vast, multi-epistemic field which can be challenging for new and experienced scholars to navigate. This paper introduces a systems-inspired taxonomy of SoTL designed to enhance accessibility, visibility, and knowledge organization within the field. Drawing from an iterative and extensive process involving a literature review, thematic coding of published SoTL inquiries from eight different journals, and international community consultations, the resulting taxonomy in its current form has six trees or “dimensions.” These include who is being studied, what aspects of learning are investigated, how learning is supported, where and when studies take place, why students learn, and the inquiry approaches used. The taxonomy serves multiple purposes: providing researchers with a structured way to situate their work, guiding literature and scoping reviews, and improving the discoverability of SoTL studies through more deliberate keyword selection. By adopting a systems-thinking perspective, this taxonomy balances structure with flexibility, offering a navigational tool rather than a rigid classification scheme. It is intended to be descriptive, rather than prescriptive, and should be regularly updated through ongoing community input and engagement in order to ensure it remains reflective of emerging research and practice in the field.
Downloads
References
Booth, Shirley, and Lorenzo C. Woollacott. 2018. “On the Constitution of SoTL: Its Domains and Contexts.” Higher Education 75 (3): 537–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0156-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0156-7
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chick, Nancy, Lorelli Nowell, and Bartlomiej Lenart. 2019. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Scoping Review Protocol.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 7 (2): 186–97. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.12
Chng, H. Hoon, and Katarina Mårtensson. 2020. “Leading Change from Different Shores: The Challenges of Contextualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (1): 24–41. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.3
Christie, Hazel, and Nina Morris. 2021. “Using Assessed Blogs to Enhance Student Engagement.” Teaching in Higher Education 26 (4): 573–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1662390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1662390
Divan, Aysha, Lynn Ludwig, Kelly Matthews, Phillip Motley, and Ana Tomljenovic-Berube. 2017. “Research Approaches in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Publications: A Systematic Literature Review.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 5 (2): 16. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.3
Dobbins, Kerry. 2024. “Applying an Academic Literacies Lens to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A Scoping Review.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 21 (5): 1–25. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/ar9qg770
Ertem, Hasan Y., and Ahmet Aypay. 2023. “Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” Higher Education Governance and Policy 4 (1): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1315869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1315869
Fanghanel, Joëlle, Jane Pritchard, Jacqueline Potter, and Gina Wisker. 2016. Defining and Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A Sector-Wide Study: Literature Review. York: Higher Education Academy.
Felten, Peter. 2013. “Principles of Good Practice in SoTL.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1 (1): 121–25. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
Finelli, Cynthia J., Maura Borrego, and Golnoosh Rasoulifar. 2015. “Development of a Taxonomy of Keywords for Engineering Education Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 104 (4): 365–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20101
Hedden, Heather. 2010. The Accidental Taxonomist. Medford, N. J.: Information Today. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2011.10766316
How, Zhan J. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Research in Higher Education Institutes from 2014–2019.” In Transforming Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, edited by Seng C. Tan and Annabel C. Shen-Hsing. Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4980-9_2
Hubball, Harry, and Anthony Clarke. 2010. “Diverse Methodological Approaches and Considerations for SoTL in Higher Education.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.2
Hubball, Harry, and Gary Poole. 2011. “18. Program-Level Assessment of Learning Outcomes in a Faculty Certificate Program on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching 1: 109–13. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v1i0.3187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v1i0.3187
Hutchings, Pat (editor). 2000. Opening Lines: Approaches to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Menlo Park: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Illinois State University. 2022. “Definitions of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL).” Accessed August 1, 2022. https://sotl.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/definingSoTL.pdf.
Kern, Beth, Gwendolyn Mettetal, Marcia Dixson, and Robin K. Morgan. 2015. “The Role of SoTL in the Academy: Upon the 25th Anniversary of Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 15 (3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i3.13623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i3.13623
Levy, Trudy. 2004. “Standard Taxonomies Offer Flexibility.” Seybold Report: Analyzing Publishing Technologies 4 (8): 9–11.
Löfgreen, Jennifer. 2023. “Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis: SoTL as its Own Kind of Inquiry.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.28
Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy, Sam L. Dvorakova, Kelly E. Matthews, Sophia Abbot, Breagh Cheng, Peter Felten, Kris Knorr, Elizabeth Marquis, Rafaella Shammas, and Kelly Swaim. 2017. “A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1 (1): 15–37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
Mettetal, Gwynn. 2002. “The What, Why, and How of Classroom Action Research.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2 (1): 6–13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1589.
Miller-Young, Janice. 2025. “Asking ‘How’ and ‘Why’ and ‘Under What Conditions’ Questions: Using Critical Realism to Study Learning and Teaching.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 13: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.40
Miller-Young, Janice, and Nancy L. Chick. 2024a. “Developing Sustained SoTL Journeys and Identities.” In Becoming a SoTL Scholar, edited by Janice Miller-Young and Nancy L. Chick. Elon, NC: Elon University Center for Engaged Learning. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa6.
Miller-Young, Janice, and Nancy L. Chick, editors. 2024b. Becoming a SoTL Scholar. Elon, NC: Elon University Center for Engaged Learning. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa6.4.0
Miller-Young, Janice, and Michelle Yeo. 2015. “Conceptualizing and Communicating SoTL: A Framework for the Field.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 3 (2): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.37
Paul, Jeff, Jillian S. Cicek, and Renato B. Rodrigues. 2024. “You’re Here! Now What? A Taxonomical Pathway for Sustained SoTL Research Engagement.” In Becoming a SoTL Scholar, edited by Janice Miller-Young and Nancy L. Chick. Elon, NC: Elon University Center for Engaged Learning. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa6.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa6.12
Poole, Gary, and Nancy Chick. 2022. “Great Introspections: How and Why SoTL Looks Inward.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 10. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.18
Scharff, Lauren, Holly Capocchiano, Nancy Chick, Michelle Eady, Jen Friberg, Diana Gregory, Kara Loy, and Trent Maurer. 2023. “Grand Challenges for SoTL.” International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. https://issotl.com/grand-challenges-for-sotl/.
Tight, Malcolm. 2018. “Tracking the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Policy Reviews in Higher Education 2 (1): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1390690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1390690
Trigwell, Keith, Elaine Martin, Joan Benjamin, and Michael Prosser. 2000. “Scholarship of Teaching: A model.” Higher Education Research & Development 19 (2): 155–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445628
Yeo, Michelle, Janice Miller-Young, and Karen Manarin. 2023. SoTL Research Methodologies: A Guide to Conceptualizing and Conducting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447054
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Janice Miller-Young, Jeffrey W. Paul, Renato B. Rodrigues, Jillian S. Cicek

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
