Exploring Immediate and Sustained Changes in Teaching Practices Following Midterm Student Feedback

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.30

Keywords:

midterm student feedback, small group instructional diagnosis, ecological model, ecological systems framework, beliefs about teaching

Abstract

Midterm student feedback is increasingly considered to have greater potential for improvement in post-secondary teaching than end-of-term course evaluations. While many benefits have been established, the process for gathering midterm feedback has been studied exclusively with the aim of characterizing short-term effects. At McMaster University, in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, midterm student feedback is called a “course refinement.” As the final part of a multiphase study investigating instructors’ perceptions of the course refinement process and its impact, this paper examines whether changes made by instructors following the course refinement process are sustained beyond the term. The study involved two phases of data collection: initially, a semi-structured in-person interview or survey completed one to three months following the conclusion of an instructor’s refined course, followed by an additional interview one year after the instructor’s course refinement. Changes to instructors’ teaching practices were evident in both phases. Furthermore, a thorough examination of sustained change revealed two predominant themes: the relationship between sustained change and instructors’ beliefs about teaching, and the impact of sustained change on various levels of higher education. The latter theme is explored via an ecological systems framework, which revealed much broader implications than we ever imagined. Course refinements do, indeed, lead to lasting changes that go beyond the boundaries of a course and have effects departmentally, institutionally, and inter-institutionally—and conceivably even influence post-secondary society and culture more widely.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rebecca L. Taylor, McMaster University

Rebecca L. Taylor (CAN) is an educational developer with the Paul R. MacPherson Institute for Leadership, Innovation, and Excellence in Teaching (MacPherson Institute) at McMaster University. Rebecca’s scholarly interests include the evaluation of teaching, post-secondary policy, and student partnerships.

Kris Knorr, McMaster University

Kris Knorr (CAN) is an educational developer at McMaster University’s MacPherson Institute, as well as a course instructor. Kris’ research interests include professional development needs of faculty/instructors, identity as scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) researchers, and student partnerships.     

Michelle Ogrodnik, University of Waterloo

Michelle Ogrodnik (CAN) is an assistant professor, teaching stream in the Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences at the University of Waterloo. She worked as an educational development fellow with the MacPherson Institute while completing her PhD at McMaster University.

Peter Sinclair, Douglas College

Peter Sinclair (CAN) is a faculty member in the Mathematics Department and the Learning Centre at Douglas College. He previously worked as a student partner with the MacPherson Institute while completing his PhD in Mathematics at McMaster University.

References

Brinko, Kathleen T. 1993. “The Practice of Giving Feedback to Improve Teaching: What is Effective?” The Journal of Higher Education 64 (5): 574–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778449

Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845

Bryman, Alan, James J. Teevan, and Edward Bell. 2009. Social Research Methods: Second Canadian Edition. Oxford University Press.

Cook‐Sather, Alison. 2009. “From Traditional Accountability to Shared Responsibility: The Benefits and Challenges of Student Consultants Gathering Midcourse Feedback in College Classrooms.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Learning 34 (2): 231–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956042

Creswell, John W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Pearson Education.

Dancy, Melissa, Alexandra Lau, Andy Rundquist, and Charles Henderson. 2019. “Faculty Online Learning Communities: A Model for Sustained Teaching Transformation.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 15 (2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020147

Derting, Terry L., Diane Ebert-May, Timothy P. Henkel, Jessica Middlemis Maher, Bryan Arnold, and Heather A. Passmore. 2016. “Assessing Faculty Professional Development in STEM Higher Education: Sustainability of Outcomes.” Science Advances 2 (3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501422

Diamond, Miriam Rosalyn. 2004. “The Usefulness of Structured Mid-Term Feedback as a Catalyst for Change in Higher Education Classes.” Active Learning in Higher Education 5 (3): 217–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404046845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404046845

Dukhi, Natisha, Sue Southwood, and Sunitha C. Srinivas. 2014. “Evaluating Students’ Experience of an Integrated Assessment: A Case Study in Health Promotion.” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research 48 (3): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.48.3.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.48.3.1

Ensor, Paula. 2004. “Modalities of Teacher Education Discourse and the Education of Effective Practitioners.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 12 (2): 217–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200197

Finelli, Cynthia, Tershia Pinder-Grover, and Mary C. Wright. 2011. “Consultations on Teaching: Using Student Feedback for Instructional Improvement.” In Advancing the Culture of Teaching on Campus, edited by Constance E. Cook and Matthew Kaplan. Stylus.

Fitzgerald, Henk Huijser, Deanna Meth, and Kellene Neilan. 2019. “Student-Staff Partnerships in Academic Development: The Course Design Studio as a Model for Sustainable Course-Wide Impact.” International Journal for Academic Development 25 (2): 134–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1631170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1631170

Goff, Lori, and Kris Knorr. 2018. “Three Heads are Better than One: Students, Faculty, and Educational Developers as Co-Developers of Science Curriculum.” International Journal for Students as Partners 2 (1): 112–20. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3333

Golding, Clinton, and Lee Adam. 2016. “Evaluate to Improve: Useful Approaches to Student Evaluation.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Learning 41 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.976810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.976810

Hendry, Graham D., and Sarah J. Dean. 2002. “Accountability, Evaluation of Teaching and Expertise in Higher Education.” International Journal for Academic Development 7 (1): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440210156493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440210156493

Hodson, Jaigris, Chandell Gosse, George Veletsianos, and Shandell Houlden. 2018. “I Get By With a Little Help from My Friends: The Ecological Model and Support for Women Scholars Experiencing Online Harassment.” First Monday 23 (8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i8.9136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i8.9136

Hurney, Carol A., Nancy L. Harris, Samantha C. Bates Prins, and S. E. Kruck. 2014. “The Impact of a Learner-Centered, Mid-Semester Course Evaluation on Students.” The Journal of Faculty Development 28 (3): 55–61. https://cetl.uni.edu/sites/default/files/impact_of_learner-centered_by_hurney_1.pdf.

Hurney, Carol A., Christine M. Rener, and Jordan D. Troisi. 2023. Midcourse Correction for the College Classroom: Putting Small Group Instructional Diagnosis to Work. Taylor & Francis.

May, Helen, and Kath Bridger. 2010. “Developing and Embedding Inclusive Policy and Practice in Higher Education.” Higher Education Academy, Jan 1. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-and-embedding-inclusive-policy-and-practice-higher-education.

McDonnell, Gerald P., and Michael D. Dodd. 2017. “Should Students Have the Power to Change Course Structure?” Teaching of Psychology 44 (2): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317692604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317692604

McLinden, Mike. 2017. “Examining Proximal and Distal Influences on the Part-Time Student Experience Through an Ecological Systems Theory.” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (3): 373–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1248391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1248391

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2020. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. SAGE.

Murray, Harry G. 1984. “The Impact of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Teaching in North American Universities.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 9 (2): 117–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293840090204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293840090204

Omer, Kamel, Shoshanah Jacobs, Karl Cottenie, Bill Bettger, John Dawson, Steffen Graether, Coral Murrant, John Zettel, and Genevieve Newton. 2023. “Evaluating and Improving the Formative Use of Student Evaluation of Teaching.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960

Peterson, Katherine S., and Kristina H. Fogelson. 2022. “Small Group Instructional Diagnosis for Faculty Development and Student Engagement in an Academic-Practice Partnership Program.” Nurse Educator 47 (2): 127–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001081

Polick, Amy S., Kristin L. Cullen, and William Buskist. 2010. “How Teaching Makes a Difference in Students’ Lives.” APS Observer 23. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:184569722.

Redmond, Mark V. 1982. “A Process of Midterm Evaluation Incorporating Small Group Discussion of a Course and Its Effect on Student Motivation.” https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:59367013.

Rosenthal, Robert. 1976. Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. John Wiley & Sons.

Shelton, Chris. 2018. “An Ecological Model for University Faculty Members’ Thinking About Technology.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30 (2): 279–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9168-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9168-2

Snooks, Margaret K., Sue E. Neeley, and Lee Revere. 2007. “Midterm Student Feedback: Results of a Pilot Study.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 18 (3): 55–73. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/660.

Sozer, E. Murat, Zuhal Zeybekoglu, and Mustafa Kaya. 2019. “Using Mid-Semester Course Evaluation as a Feedback Tool for Improving Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (7): 1003–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1564810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1564810

Taylor, Rebecca L., Kris Knorr, Michelle Ogrodnik, and Peter Sinclair. 2020. “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Midterm Student Feedback.” International Journal for Academic Development 25 (4): 350–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2020.1762086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1762086

Turner, Rebecca, Rong Huang, Oxana Poverjuc, and Lynne Wyness. 2015. “What Role Do Teaching Mentors Play in Supporting New University Lecturers to Develop Their Teaching Practices?” Professional Development in Education 42 (4): 647–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065898

Veeck, Ann, Kelley O’Reilly, Amy MacMillan, and Hongyan Yu. 2016. “The Use of Collaborative Midterm Student Evaluations to Provide Actionable Results.” Journal of Marketing Education 38 (3): 157–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315619652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315619652

Zabaleta, Francisco. 2007. “The Use and Misuse of Student Evaluations of Teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (1): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131

Students sit in a classroom watching their instructor write on a chalk board.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Taylor, Rebecca L., Kris Knorr, Michelle Ogrodnik, and Peter Sinclair. 2025. “Exploring Immediate and Sustained Changes in Teaching Practices Following Midterm Student Feedback”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 13 (May):1–18. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.30.