Agency Development and Valuing Peer Perspectives: Lessons from an Intervention to Enhance STEM University Students’ Feedback Literacy

Luotong Hui; Kate Ippolito; Magda Charalambous

doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.45

Authors

Luotong Hui Imperial College London https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-2688
Kate Ippolito Imperial College London
Magda Charalambous Imperial College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.45

Keywords:

feedback literacy, intervention, agency, feedback knowledge

Abstract

In order for students to benefit from feedback, they must develop their feedback literacy. To investigate the extent to which informing students about feedback knowledge and scaffolding practice for making sense of feedback increases feedback literacy, we conducted a skills-based intervention study. The results showed that the intervention increased students’ feedback knowledge, that is, their understanding about the purpose of feedback and the need to engage with it proactively. However, the intervention did not increase participants’ feedback literacy to a statistically significant extent. This may be due to the centrality of learner agency in feedback literacy and lack of time for this complex construct to develop. Findings from post-intervention focus group interviews revealed variation in students’ understanding and agency in relation to engaging with feedback and the importance of including various opportunities to develop agency as part of feedback literacy training, including through peer perspective sharing. Cultural influences on feedback processes appeared to be less significant than anticipated. Instead, individual differences, such as personal interpretations of feedback and associated emotional responses, were more likely to create barriers, and should therefore be considered when developing feedback literacy. This paper offers suggestions for implementing more effective feedback literacy development opportunities, including those that emphasise building on a foundation of feedback knowledge and the role of peers and peer feedback. We propose that future studies should develop an integrative approach to feedback literacy training that acknowledges the complexity and time demands of agency development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luotong Hui, Imperial College London

Luotong Hui (GBR) is a research associate at Imperial College London. Her work focuses on selfregulated learning and feedback literacy.

Kate Ippolito, Imperial College London

Kate Ippolito (GBR) is deputy director of the educational development unit at Imperial College London. Her work focuses on promoting inclusive learning, teaching and assessment practices, and working with emotion in higher education.

Magda Charalambous, Imperial College London

Magda Charalambous (GBR) is a principal lecturer at Imperial College London. Her education interests centre on promoting self-regulation strategies to enhance student learning.

References

Bandura, Albert. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2): 164–80.

Boud, David, and Elizabeth Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698 –712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.

Carless, David, and David Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315 –25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.

Chong, S. Wang. 2021. “Reconsidering Student Feedback Literacy from an Ecological Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765.

Clarke, Victoria, and Virginia Braun. 2021. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide, 1–100. Sage Publications.

Code, Jillianne. 2020. “Agency for Learning: Intention, Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation.” Frontiers in Genetics 5: 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019.

Faul, Franz, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, and Albert-Georg Lang. 2009. G* Power (Version 3.1. 9.6) [Computer Software]. Department of Psychology of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf.

Gross, James J., and Ross A. Thompson. 2007. “Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations.” James J. Gross, Editor. Handbook of Emotion Regulation, 3–24.

Hattie, John. 2009. “The Black Box of Tertiary Assessment: An Impending Revolution.” Tertiary Assessment & Higher Education Student Outcomes: Policy, Practice & Research (259): 275.

Hattie, John, and Helen Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

Hui, Luotong, Kate Ippolito, Moira Sarsfield, and Magda Charalambous. 2023. “Using a Self-Reflective Eportfolio and Feedback Dialogue to Understand and Address Problematic Feedback Expectations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2232960.

Ippolito, Kate, Nikki Boyd, Richard Bale, and Martyn Kingsbury. 2020. “Emotions as Pedagogical Tools: The Role for Educational Developers in University Learning and Beyond.” ETH Learning and Teaching Journal 2 (2): 322–6. https://doi.org/10.16906/lt-eth.v2i2.156.

Ippolito, Kate, and Martyn Kingsbury. 2024. “Reciprocal Cognitive and Emotional Interaction in STEMM University Learning and Teaching.” Science Reports 14: 21660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72656-w.

Little, Tegan, Phillip Dawson, David Boud, and Joanna Tai. 2024. “Can Students’ Feedback Literacy Be Improved? A Scoping Review of Interventions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 49 (1): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2177613.

Mair, Patrick, and Rand Wilcox. 2019. “Robust Statistical Methods Using Wrs2.” The WRS2 Package.

Malecka, Bianka, David Boud, and David Carless. 2022. “Eliciting, Processing and Enacting Feedback: Mechanisms for Embedding Student Feedback Literacy within the Curriculum.” Teaching in Higher Education 27 (7): 908–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784.

Nieminen, Juuso H., Joanna Tai, David Boud, and Michael Henderson. 2022. “Student Agency in Feedback: Beyond the Individual.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (1): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887080.

Palincsar, A. Sullivan. 1998. “Social Constructivist Perspectives on Teaching and Learning.” Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1): 345–75.

Price, Margaret, Karen Handley, and Jill Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–96.

Rossiter, Monika P. 2022. “‘What You Mean Versus What You Say’—Exploring the Role of Language and Culture in European Students’ Interpretation of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (4): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2097197.

Rossiter, Monika P., and Richard Bale. 2023. “Cultural and Linguistic Dimensions of Feedback: A Model of Intercultural Feedback Literacy.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 60 (3): 368–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2175017.

Rovagnati, Veronica, Edd Pitt, and Naomi Winstone. 2022. “Feedback Cultures, Histories and Literacies: International Postgraduate Students’ Experiences.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (3): 347–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1916431.

Sutton, Paul. 2012. “Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (1): 31–40.

Szanto, Thomas, and Joel Krueger. 2019. “Introduction: Empathy, Shared Emotions, and Social Identity.” Topoi 38: 153–62.

Tian, Mei, and John Lowe. 2013. “The Role of Feedback in Cross-Cultural Learning: A Case Study of Chinese Taught Postgraduate Students in a UK University.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (5): 580–98.

Winstone, Naomi, and David Carless. 2019. Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach. Routledge.

Winstone, Naomi E., Georgina Mathlin, and Robert A. Nash. 2019. “Building Feedback Literacy: Students’ Perceptions of the Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit.” Frontiers in Education 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00039.

Winstone, Naomi E., Robert A. Nash, Michael Parker, and James Rowntree. 2017. “Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52 (1): 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.

Yan, Zi, and David Carless. 2022. “Self-Assessment Is About More Than Self: The Enabling Role of Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (7): 1116–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431.

Yang, Min, and David Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–97.

Yuriev, Elizabeth, Som Naidu, Luke S. Schembri, and Jennifer L. Short. 2017. “Scaffolding the Development of Problem-Solving Skills in Chemistry: Guiding Novice Students out of Dead Ends and False Starts.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 18 (3): 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00009J.

Zhan, Ying. 2021. “Developing and Validating a Student Feedback Literacy Scale.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47 (7): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001430.

Zhan, Ying. 2022. “Teacher Educators’ Perceptions of Schoolteacher Feedback Literacy: Implications for Feedback Training in Teacher Education Programmes.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online) 47 (10): 106–24. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2022v47n10.6.