Graduate Student Completion and Comprehension of Assigned Readings: A SoTL Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.24Keywords:
literacy, college reading, higher education, graduate education, speech-language pathologyAbstract
This project examined the effectiveness of two reading strategies for graduate speech-language pathology students: peer-guided questioning using social annotation and individual reading with general instructor guidance. Thirty-six students were randomly assigned to one of the strategies, alternating for four assignments. Comprehension quizzes and self-reported reading completion were assessed. Additionally, student attitudes toward assigned readings were explored pre- and post-project, along with barriers and facilitators to reading comprehension. Results showed no significant difference between the strategies in improving comprehension or the amount of reading completed. Reported barriers to reading included time constraints and complex texts, while suggested facilitators involved pre-reading preparation and vocabulary instruction. Although neither strategy proved superior, the study highlights potential instructor-led approaches to enhance student engagement and comprehension with assigned readings, such as addressing barriers and implementing facilitators. Reflection on unexamined assumptions for this project was presented.
Downloads
References
Baron, Kristy A. 2017. “Changing to Concept-Based Curricula: The Process for Nurse Educators.” The Open Nursing Journal 11 (1): 277–87. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010277
Baron, Naomi S., and Anne Mangen. 2021. “Doing the Reading: The Decline of Long Long-Form Reading in Higher Education.” Poetics Today 42 (2): 253–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-8883248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-8883248
Bettinger, Eric P., and Bridget Terry Long. 2009. “Addressing the Needs of Underprepared Students in Higher Education: Does College Remediation Work?” The Journal of Human Resources 44 (3): 736–71. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.44.3.736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2009.0033
Burchfield, Colin M., and John Sappington. 2000. “Compliance With Required Reading Assignments.” Teaching of Psychology 27 (1): 58.
Cheung, Alan C. K., and Robert E. Slavin. 2013. “Effects of Educational Technology Applications on Reading Outcomes for Struggling Readers: A Best-Evidence Synthesis.” Reading Research Quarterly 48 (3): 277–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.50
Choi, Ikseon, Susan M. Land, and Alfred J. Turgeon. 2005. “Scaffolding Peer-Questioning Strategies to Facilitate Metacognition during Online Small Group Discussion.” Instructional Science 33 (5–6): 483–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4
Clark, Ruth C., and Richard E. Mayer. 2016. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Clinton-Lisell, Virginia, Terrill Taylor, Sarah E. Carlson, Mark L. Davison, and Ben Seipel. 2022. “Performance on Reading Comprehension Assessments and College Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of College Reading and Learning 52 (3): 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2062626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2062626
Doolittle, Peter E., David Hicks, Cheri F. Triplett, William Dee Nichols, and Carl A. Young. 2005. “Reciprocal Teaching for Reading Comprehension in Higher Education: A Strategy for Fostering the Deeper Understanding of Texts.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 17 (2): 14.
Dunlosky, John, Katherine A. Rawson, Elizabeth J. Marsh, Mitchell J. Nathan, and Daniel T. Willingham. 2013. “Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14 (1): 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
El-Koumy, Abdel. 1996. “Effects of Three Questioning Strategies on EFL Reading Comprehension.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364867
Fuchs, Lynn S., Douglas Fuchs, and Linn Maxwell. 1988. “The Validity of Informal Reading Comprehension Measures.” Remedial and Special Education 9 (2): 20–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900206
Gao, Fei. 2013. “A Case Study of Using a Social Annotation Tool to Support Collaboratively Learning.” The Internet and Higher Education 17 (April): 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.002
Gao, Nan, Soundariya Ananthan, Chun Yu, Yuntao Wang, and Flora D. Salim. 2023. “Critiquing Self-Report Practices for Human Mental and Wellbeing Computing at Ubicomp.” ArXiv.Org, November.
Gorzycki, Meg, Geoffrey Desa, Pamela J. Howard, and Diane D. Allen. 2020. “‘Reading Is Important,’ but ‘I Don’t Read’: Undergraduates’ Experiences With Academic Reading.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 63 (5): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1020
Hopkin, Cameron R., Rick H. Hoyle, and Nisha C. Gottfredson. 2015. “Maximizing the Yield of Small Samples in Prevention Research: A Review of General Strategies and Best Practices.” Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research 16 (7): 950–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0542-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0542-7
Hypothes.is. n.d. “Hypothes.Is.” https://web.hypothes.is/
King, Alison. 1997. “ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A Model of Transactive Peer Tutoring for Scaffolding Higher Level Complex Learning” Educational Psychologist 32 (4): 221. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_3
Kintsch, Walter. 1998. “The Representation of Knowledge in Minds and Machines.” International Journal of Psychology 33 (6): 411–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075998400169 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/002075998400169
Kintsch, Walter, and Teun van Dijk. 1978. “Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production.” Psychological Review 85 (5). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.85.5.363
K.L.E., Marissa. 2021. “Using an Online Social Annotation Tool in a Content-Based Instruction (CBI) Classroom.” International Journal of TESOL Studies 3 (2): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2021.06.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2021.06.02
Maurer, Trent W., and Emily Cabay. 2023. “Challenges of Shaping Student Study Strategies for Success: Replication and Extension.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 11 (June). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.18
Maurer, Trent, and Catelyn Shipp. 2021. “Challenges of Shaping Student Study Strategies for Success.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9 (1):241-57. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.16
Mayer, Richard E., Julie Heiser, and Steve Lonn. 2001. “Cognitive Constraints on Multimedia Learning: When Presenting More Material Results in Less Understanding.” J. Educ. Psychol. 93 (1): 187–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.187
McKinley, Jim. 2015. “Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing.” Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 12 (3): 184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558
Meibodi, Manizhe Kalantari, Sima Lakdizaji, Farahnaz Abdollahzadeh, Hadi Hassankhanih, Azad Rahmani, and Kathie Lasater. 2013. “Impact of Guided Reciprocal Peer Questioning on the Disposition of Critical Thinking among Nursing Students.” Thrita 2 (3): 10–14. https://doi.org/10.5812/thrita.8716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/thrita.8716
Morales, Esteban, Jeremiah H. Kalir, Alice Fleerackers, and Juan Pablo Alperin. 2022. “Using Social Annotation to Construct Knowledge with Others: A Case Study across Undergraduate Courses [Version 2; Peer Review: 2 Approved].” F1000Research 11: 235. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109525.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109525.2
Nakamoto, Ryosuke, Brendan Flanagan, Yiling Dai, Taisei Yamauchi, Kyosuke Takami, and Hiroaki Ogata. 2023. “Enhancing Self-Explanation Learning through a Real-Time Feedback System: An Empirical Evaluation Study.” Sustainability 15 (21): 155–77. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115577
Novak, Elena, Rim Razzouk, and Tristan E. Johnson. 2012. “The Educational Use of Social Annotation Tools in Higher Education: A Literature Review.” The Internet and Higher Education, Social Media in Higher Education, 15 (1): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.002
Oliver, Dana. 2022. “Pedagogical Approaches for Improving Reading Compliance and Discussion in Higher Education Classrooms.” College Student Journal 56 (2): 151–67.
Oreopoulos, Philip, and Uros Petronijevic. 2019. “The Remarkable Unresponsiveness of College Students to Nudging And What We Can Learn from It.” https://doi.org/10.3386/w26059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w26059
de la Peña Álvarez, Cristina, and María Jesús Luque-Rojas. 2021. “Levels of Reading Comprehension in Higher Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Frontiers in Psychology 12 (January): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712901. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712901
Perkins, David. N., Michael Farady, and Barbara Bushey. 1991. “Everyday Reasoning and the Roots of Intelligence.” In Informal Reasoning and Education, edited by James F. Voss, David N. Perkins, and Judith W. Segal. New York: Routledge.
Rashwan, Zohour Ibrahim, Toqa Jameel Busebaia, Amal Saad AL-Sabbagh, and Rasha Salah Eweida. 2021. “Effect of Guided Reciprocal Peer Questioning Strategy on Pediatric Nursing Students’ Self-Esteem and Metacognitive Awareness: Current Approach and Future Directions.” Nurse Education Today 107 (December):105–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105153
Roberts, Judith C., and Keith A. Roberts. 2008. “Deep Reading, Cost/Benefit, and the Construction of Meaning: Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Deep Learning in Sociology Courses.” Teaching Sociology 36 (2): 125–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0803600203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0803600203
Sands, Anita, and Madeline Goodman. 2018. “Too Big To Fail: Millennials on the Margins.” Report of the ETS Center for Research on Human Capital and Education. https://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/publications/report/2018/jzaw.html.
Sweller, John. 1994. “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design.” Learning and Instruction 4 (4): 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Vygotsky, Lev. S. 1978. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Walden, Patrick R. 2022. “Student Motivation, Anxiety and Pass/Fail Grading: A SoTL Project.” Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders 6 (1): 13. https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD6.1.1649037808.651639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD6.1.1649037808.651639
Wang, Tingting, Shan Li, Xiaoshan Huang, Zexuan Pan, and Susanne P. Lajoie. 2023. “Examining Students’ Cognitive Load in the Context of Self-Regulated Learning with an Intelligent Tutoring System.” Education and Information Technologies 28 (5): 5697–5715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11357-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11357-1
Wiles, Janine, Ruth Allen, and Rachael Butler. 2016. “Owning My Thoughts Was Difficult: Encouraging Students to Read and Write Critically in a Tertiary Qualitative Research Methods Course.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.13.1.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.13.1.8
de Winter, Joost. 2013. “Using the Student’s t-Test with Extremely Small Sample Sizes.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 18: 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/e4r6-dj05.
Wolfe, Joanna. 2008. “Annotations and the Collaborative Digital Library: Effects of an Aligned Annotation Interface on Student Argumentation and Reading Strategies.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3 (2): 141–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9040-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9040-x
Woloshyn, Vera E., Michael Pressley, and Wolfgang Schneider. 2023. “Elaborative-Interrogation and Prior-Knowledge Effects on Learning of Facts.” Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (1): 115–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.84.1.115
Zhu, Xinran, Bodong Chen, Rukmini Manasa Avadhanam, Hong Shui, and Raymond Zhuo Zhang. 2020. “Reading and Connecting: Using Social Annotation in Online Classes.” Information and Learning Sciences 121 (5–6): 261–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0117
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Patrick R. Walden, Brittany Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
