Individual Differences in the Context of Active Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.20Keywords:
Reacting to the Past, Active learning, individual differencesAbstract
Active learning pedagogies’ benefits for academic outcomes are well-established (Prince 2004). There is, however, evidence of individual differences in outcomes (Richardson et al. 2012). The present study considers whether gender, race, and socio-economic status (SES) relate to academic self-efficacy, perceived learning, and student engagement during the intense active learning experience of Reacting to the Past (Reacting). Students from three US universities (N = 211) completed a survey after participating in a Reacting game. The survey assessed academic self-efficacy, perceived learning, and engagement and collected student-reported demographic characteristics. Female students perceived more learning, more achievement of learning outcomes, and more enjoyment than their male peers; they also reported more engagement with the game. Students from minoritized racial groups were generally more positive about their Reacting experience than White students, especially with regard to perceived learning. Students from low socioeconomic status groups reported more engagement with the game than those from higher SES status groups.
Downloads
References
Bledsoe, Robert S., Lee Anna Maynard, and Deborah South Richardson. 2018. The Crowded Streets of Paris: Using RTTP in Less-Than-Ideal Situations.” In Playing to Learn with Reacting to the Past: Research on High Impact, Active Learning Practices, edited by C. Edward Watson and Thomas Chase Hagood. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61747-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61747-3_3
Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111 (23): 8410–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Haak, David C., Janneke HilleRisLambers, Emile Pitre, and Scott Freeman. 2011. “Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology.” Science 332: 1213–16. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820
Handelsman, Mitchell M., William L. Briggs, Nora Sullivan, and Annette Towler. 2005. “A Measure of College Student Course Engagement.” Journal of Educational Research 98: 184–92. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
Richardson, Michelle, Charles Abraham, and Rod Bond. 2012. “Psychological Correlates of University Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 138 (2): 353–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Schult, Carolyn A., April Lindinsky, Lisa Fetheringill Zwicker, and Elizabeth E. Dunn. 2018. “Strengthening Students’ Self-efficacy through Reacting to the Past.” In Playing to Learn with Reacting to the Past: Research on High Impact, Active Learning Practices, edited by C. Edward Watson and Thomas Chase Hagood. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61747-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61747-3_4

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Robert Bledsoe , Deborah South Richardson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.