Scaffolding the Flipped Classroom to Enhance Students’ Learning Process

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.26

Keywords:

flipped classroom, scaffolding, blended learning, activating education, learner-centered approach, self-regulation

Abstract

After multiple trials to determine the most effective flipped classroom design for our bachelor course, Philosophy of Science, we established a setup with compulsory flipped workgroups at the core, while online knowledge videos and optional joint classes offer preparatory support. This article documents our attempts to improve scaffolding offered in the optional joint classes by structuring them according to the Question Driven Discovery model. Regarding the effectiveness of the offered scaffolding, the findings are mixed: students did not perceive the joint classes as highly activating or yielding positive learning effects, and most preferred to prepare for flipped workgroups independently. However, substantial differences were noted in learning activities and outcomes between attendees and non-attendees, as well as in their valuation of the supportive and activating function of the joint classes. These results confirm earlier findings which show that, to capitalize on the potential activating effect of the flipped classroom during the bachelor phase, instructors need to strike the right balance between structure and flexibility. As early career students’ capacity to self-regulate is limited, we recommend future research focuses on how to design assignments and assessment in such a way that students are required to engage in scaffolding learning activities, even if they are non-compulsory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Coyan Tromp, University of Amsterdam

Dr. Coyan Tromp (NLD) is curriculum developer and assistant professor at the University of Amsterdam. Her main focus is on sustainability issues. She experiments with innovative pedagogical concepts and the impact of Generative AI on academic education.

References

Abeysekera, Lakmal, and Phillip Dawson. 2015. “Motivation and Cognitive Load in the Flipped Classroom: Definition, Rationale and a Call for Research.” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336

Akçayır, Gökçe, and Murat Akçayır. 2018. “The Flipped Classroom: A Review of its Advantages and Challenges.” Computers & Education 126: 334–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021

Alten, David van, Chris Phielix, Jeroen Janssen, and Liesbeth Kester. 2019. “Effects of Flipping the Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research Review 28: 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003

Awidi, Imanuel T., and Mark Paynter. 2019. “The Impact of a Flipped Classroom Approach on Student Learning Experience.” Computers & Education 128: 269–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013

Bendermacher, Guy, Invest Wolfhagen, and Diana Dolmans. 2017. “Unravelling Quality Culture in Higher Education: A Realist Review.” Higher Education 73 (1): 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9979-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9979-2

Benton, Stephen L., and William E. Cashin. 2014. “Student Ratings of Instruction in College and University Courses.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by Michael B. Paulson, vol. 29, 279–326. Dordrecht, NL: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_7

Bergmann, Jonathan, and Aaron Sams. 2012. Flip Your Classroom. Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Eugene/Alexandria: ISTE and ASCD.

Biggs, John, and Catherine Tang. 2015. “Constructive Alignment: An Outcomes-Based Approach to Teaching Anatomy.” Chan, Lap Ki and Wojciech Pawlina, editors. Teaching Anatomy: A Practical Guide: 31–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_4

Boom van den, Gerard. 2011. Ontwerpen Met Modellen. Heerlen, NE: Open Universiteit.

Braseby, Anne M. 2015. The Flipped Classroom. Idea Paper 57. http://ideaedu.org/research-and-papers/idea-papers/idea-paper-no-57/.

Bredow, Carrie A., Patricia V. Roehling, Alexandra J. Knorp, and Andrea M. Sweet. 2021. “To Flip or Not to Flip? A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Flipped Learning in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research 91 (6): 878–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019122

Bruchatz, Christian, Robert Fischer, and Janine Stelzer. 2018. Applying Design Thinking – A Workbook on Methods for Teachers in Higher Education and Researchers. Center for Synergy Enhancement in Commission of Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union.

Cho, Moon-Heum, and Joon B. Kim. 2013. “Students’ Self-Regulation for Interaction with Others in Online Learning Environments.” Internet and Higher Education 17: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001

Cho, Moon-Heum, and Yoonjung Cho. 2014. “Instructor Scaffolding for Interaction and Students’ Academic Engagement in Online Learning: Mediating Role of Perceived Online Class Goal Structures.” Internet and Higher Education 21: 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008

College van Bestuur OU. 2021. Het OU Onderwijsmodel: Activerend Academisch Afstandsonderwijs. Day, Jason A. 2008. Investigating Learning With Web Lectures. Georgia Institute of Technology.

Doyle, I.C., M. I. Krupicka, and T. Vo. 2013. Student Perceptions During the Implementation of the Flipped Classroom Model in a Modified Block Curriculum. Paper Presented at the 114th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL.

Dulfer, Nicky, Catherine Smith, Matthew Harrison, and Mark Selkrig. 2023. “Digital Learning: How to Manage a Very Tricky Balance.” EduResearch Matters, Digital Learning: How to Manage a Very Tricky Balance—EduResearch Matters. aare.edu.au.

Estes, Michele D., Rich Ingram, and Juhong Christie Liu. 2014. A Review of Flipped Classroom Research, Practice, and Technologies. Accessed at Volume International HETL Review. https://www.hetl.org/a-review-of-flipped-classroom-research-practice-and-technologies/.

Fisher, J., and M. T. Assa-Eley. 2013. The Flipped Classroom: Increased Acceptance of Active Learning in the Science Classroom. Paper Presented at the 114th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL.

Heffernan, Troy. 2022. “Sexism, Racism, Prejudice, and Bias: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Research Surrounding Student Evaluations of Courses and Teaching.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (1): 144–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075

Kirschner, Paul A., and Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer. 2013. “Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education.” Educational Psychologist 48 (3): 169–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395

Lage, Maureen J., Glenn J. Platt, and Michael Treglia. 2000. “Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment.” The Journal of Economic Education 31 (1): 30–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759

Marsh, Herb. 2007. “Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness.” The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective: 319–83. Dordrecht, NE: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_9

Massingham, Peter, and Tony Herrington. 2006. “Does Attendance Matter? An Examination of Student Attitudes, Participation, Performance and Attendance.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 3 (2): 20–42. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.3.2.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.3.2.3

McNally, Brenton, Janine Chipperfield, Pat Dorsett, Letitia Del Fabbro, Valda Frommolt, Sandra Goetz, Joanne Lewohl, Matthew Molineux, Andrew Pearson, Gregory Reddan, Anna Roiko, and Andrea Rung. 2017. “Flipped Classroom Experiences: Student Preferences and Flip Strategy in a Higher Education Context.” Higher Education 73: 281–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0014-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0014-z

O’Flaherty, Jacqueline, and Craig Phillips. 2015. “The Use of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education: A Scoping Review.” Internet and Higher Education 25: 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002

Sætra, Henrik Skaug. 2022. “Scaffolding Human Champions: AI as a More Competent Other.” Human Arenas 8: 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00304-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00304-8

Selkrig, Mark, Nicole Dulfer, Matthew Harrison, Catherine Smith, Thomas Cochrane, and Amy McKernan. 2023. Keeping It Human: Learning Design in the Digital World. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne Faculty of Education.

Sointu, Erkko, Mareena Hyypiä, Matthew C. Lambert, Laura Hirsto, Markku Saarelainen, and Teemu Valtonen. 2023. “Preliminary Evidence of Key Factors in Successful Flipping: Predicting Positive Student Experiences in Flipped Classrooms.” Higher Education 85 (3): 503–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00848-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00848-2

Strelan, Peter, Amanda Osborn, and Edward Palmer. 2020a. “The Flipped Classroom: A Meta-Analysis of Effects on Student Performance Across Disciplines and Education Levels.” Educational Research Review 30: 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

Strelan, Peter, Amanda Osborn, and Edward Palmer. 2020b. “Student Satisfaction With Courses and Instructors in a Flipped Classroom: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36 (3): 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12421

Top Hat. 2021. Top Hat Field Report: 3,052 College Students on the Good, the Bad and Learning Post-COVID. Toronto: Top Hat Active Learning Courseware Platform for Higher Education.

Tromp, Coyan. 2018. Wicked Philosophy. Philosophy of Science and Vision Development for Complex Problems. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048541096

Tromp, Coyan. 2022. “The Return to the Classroom: Offering Scaffolding Joint Classes to Prepare for Flipped Workgroups.” Proceedings 15th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI). Sevilla, ESP: IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1236

Velde, Robin van der, Nadine Blignaut van Westrhenen, Nanon H. M. Labrie, and Marjolein B. M. Zweekhorst. 2021. “‘The Idea Is Nice. . . But Not for Me’: First-Year Students’ Readiness for Large-Scale ‘Flipped Lectures’—What (De)motivates Them?” Higher Education 81: 1157–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00604-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00604-4

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wood, David, Jerome S. Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17 (2): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

An illustration of four people sitting a table underneath construction scaffolding.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Tromp, Coyan. 2025. “Scaffolding the Flipped Classroom to Enhance Students’ Learning Process”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 13 (May):1–18. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.26.