Establishing and Sustaining SoTL: The Role of Brokering and Strategic Leadership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.18Keywords:
strategic leadership, landscape of practice, brokering, sustainingAbstract
Although the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) has continued to evolve as a field, building and sustaining SoTL within educational institutions remains challenging. Through interviews with 18 SoTL scholars, we sought to examine the question, “How do individuals and institutions sustain SoTL?” Our findings highlighted the important roles of brokering and strategic leadership. Using the landscape of practice as our theoretical framework, we identified the many ways that SoTL scholars influence and are influenced by these roles. SoTL practices are undeniably vulnerable to fluctuating institutional agendas and discourses, changes in leadership, funding opportunities, formal rewards, and overt recognition of SoTL, including scholars’ positions and titles. We found institutional actions may be critical in launching SoTL, supporting it at different times, or establishing academic positions for SoTL scholars who are able to promote the field. However, institutional support waxed and waned across institutions, with a few exceptions, which meant that the SoTL brokers working across the landscape of practice sustained SoTL over time through their strategic leadership. Despite varying contexts, our participants were in it for the long haul, brokering their connections to withstand the vagaries of institutional support. Thus, building SoTL is a long-term effort that requires resilience and a certain degree of institutional support, but more importantly, sustained, bottom-up support for faculty development, collaboration, and commitment across the landscape of practice.
Downloads
References
Ashwin, Paul, and Keith Trigwell. 2004. “Investigating Staff and Educational Development.” In Enhancing Staff and Educational Development, edited by David Baume and Peter Kahn, 137–51. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416228-11
Bernstein, Daniel. 2013. “How SoTL-Active Faculty Members can be Cosmopolitan Assets to an Institution.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1 (1): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.35
Boyatzis, Richard E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Felten, Peter, John N. Gardner, Charles C. Schroeder, Leo M. Lambert, Betsy O. Barefoot, and Freeman A. Hrabowski. 2016. The Undergraduate Experience: Focusing Institutions on What Matters Most, 117–31. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Fereday, Jennifer, and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Fitzgerald, Ange, Graham Parr, Judy Williams, Rachel Wellam, Bethany Howard, Stavroula Zandes, and Basia Diug. 2023. “Interfaculty Collaboration for Improving International Mobility Experiences: Sustaining a Dialogue Across Difference.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (10): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1769056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1769056
Frake-Mistak, Mandy, Heidi L. Marsh, Genviève Maheux-Pelletier, and Siobhan Williams. 2020. “Making SoTL Stick: Using a Community-Based Approach to Engage Faculty in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” In Evidence-Based Faculty Development Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, edited by Rachel C. Plews and Michelle L. Amos, 60–77. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2212-7.ch004
Gansemer-Topf, Ann M., Andrea S. Webb, Barbara Kensington-Miller, Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, Heather Lewis, Julie Luu, and Analise Hofmann. 2021. “Navigating the Chaos: The Value of SoTL During Times of Uncertainty.” Transformative Dialogues 14 (2): 30–40.
Geertsema, Johan. 2016. “Academic Development, SoTL, and Educational Research.” International Journal for Academic Development 21 (2): 122–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1175144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1175144
Godbold, Nattalia, Kelly E. Matthews, and Deanne Gannaway. 2023. “Theorising New Possibilities for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and Teaching-focused Academics.” Higher Education Research and Development 43 (1): 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2218809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2218809
Jawitz, Jeff, and Teresa Perez. 2015. “Investing in Teaching Development: Navigating Risk in a Research Intensive Institution.” International Journal for Academic Development 21 (3): 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1081852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1081852
Kensington-Miller, Barbara, Andrea S. Webb, Ann Gansemer-Topf, Heather Lewis, Analise Hofmann, Julie Luu, and Genevieve Maheux-Pelletier. 2021 “Brokering Boundary Crossings through the SoTL Landscape of Practice.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9 (10): 365–79. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/9.1.24
Kensington-Miller, Barbara, Andrea S. Webb, Genevieve Maheux-Pelletier, Ann Gansemer-Topf, Heather Lewis, Analise Hofmann, and Julie Luu. 2024. “Our International SoTL Journey: Brokering Across Academic Hierarchies and Boundaries.” Teaching in Higher Education 29 (6): 1554–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2070841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2070841
Kim, Alice S. N., Celia Popovic, Laura Farrugia, Salma A. F. Saleh, Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, and Mandy Frake-Mistak. 2020. “On Nurturing the Emergent SoTL Researcher: Responding to Challenges and Opportunities.” International Journal for Academic Development 26 (2): 163–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1842743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1842743
Kincheloe, Joe. 2001. “Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 679–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700601
Kincheloe, Joe L. 2005. “On to the Next Level: Continuing the Conceptualization of the Bricolage.” Qualitative Inquiry 11 (3): 323–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405275056
Kubiak, Chris, Mark Fenton-O’Creevy, Karen Appleby, Maxine Kempster, Michael Reed, Carla Solvason, and Mary Thorpe. 2015. “Brokering Boundary Encounters.” In Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning, edited by Etienne Wenger-Trayner, Mark Fenton-O’Creevy, Steven Hutchinson, Chris Kubiak, and Beverly Wenger-Trayner, 81–96. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777122-8
Maheux-Pelletier, Geneviève, Heidi L. Marsch, and Mandy Frake-Mistak. 2019. “The Benefits of Writing Retreats Revisited.” In Critical Collaboration Communities: Academic Writing Partnerships, Groups, and Retreat, edited by Nicola Simmons, 95–105. Brill/Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410985_008
Manarin, Karen, and Earle Abrahamson. 2016. “Troublesome Knowledge of SoTL.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2016.100202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2016.100202
Newton, Genevieve, Janice Miller-Young, and Monica Sanago. 2019. “Characterizing SoTL across Canada.” Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8174
Pinar, William. 2001. “The Researcher as Bricoleur: The Teacher as Public Intellectual.” Qualitative Inquiry 7 (6): 696–700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700603
Potter, Micheal K., and Erika D. H. Kustra. 2011. “The Relationship between Scholarly Teaching and SoTL: Models, Distinctions, and Clarifications.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 5 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050123
Pyrko, Igor, Victor Dofler, and Colin Eden. 2019. “Communities of Practice within Landscapes of Practice.” Management Learning 50 (4): 482–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619860854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619860854
Rubin, Herbert J., and Irene S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Schrum, Kelly, and Katarina Mårtensson. 2023. “Growing SoTL—Embracing Diversity, Messiness, and Complexity.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 11 (January). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.1
Simmons, Nicola. 2016. “Synthesizing SoTL Institutional Initiatives toward National Impact.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 146: 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20192
Tierney, Anne M., Dorothy Aidulis, Julian Park, and Katherine Clark. 2020. “Supporting SoTL Development Through Communities of Practice.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2): 32–52. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.4
Tight, Malcolm. 2018. “Tracking the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Policy Reviews in Higher Education 2 (1): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1390690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1390690
van Manen, Max. 1997. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London, ON: Althouse Press.
Webb, Andrea, Barbara Kensington-Miller, Genvieve Maheux-Pelletier, Heather Lewis, Ann Gansemer-Topf, and Analise Hofmann. 2024. “The Importance of Autonomy and Community for SoTL Engagement: How Six Scholars Embraced Change to Assert Their SoTL Values and Identity.” In N. Becoming a SoTL Scholar, edited by Nancy Chick and Janice Miller-Young Elon, NC: Elon University Center for Engaged Learning. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa6
Webb, Andrea S., and Anne M. Tierney. 2019. “Investigating Support for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; We Need SoTL Educational Leaders.” Innovation in Education and Teaching International 57 (5): 613–24.https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1635905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1635905
Webb, Andrea S., and Ashley J. Welsh. 2019. “Phenomenology as a Methodology for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Research” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 7 (1): 168–81. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.1.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.1.11
Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wenger-Trayner, Etienne, and Beverly Wenger-Trayner. 2015. “Learning in a Landscape of Practice.” In Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability in Practice-Based Learning, edited by Etienne Wenger-Trayner, Mark Fenton-O’Creevy, Steven Hutchinson, Chris Kubiak, and Beverly Wenger-Trayner, 13–32. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777122-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Barbara Kensington-Miller, Andrea S. Webb, Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, Heather Lewis, Ann M. Gansemer-Topf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
