Increase Engaged Student Learning Using Google Docs as a Discussion Platform

Mary Morse

doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.20

Authors

Mary Morse University of West Georgia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.20

Keywords:

Student engagement, online discussion, online learning environment, discussion board, Student Participation

Abstract

Online discussion board activities have traditionally been a primary method of providing student-to-student interaction, especially in asynchronous online classes. This study examines the impact of an alternate online discussion tool on student participation in online discussion assignments. Three identical discussion assignments were examined over the course of two semesters. The first semester utilized the traditional Learning Management System (LMS) threaded discussion board. The second semester incorporated Google Docs as the discussion platform. Overall, students using Google Docs made 68 percent more posts per student than students using the traditional LMS discussion board. Students using Google Docs also demonstrated more engagement by sharing professional experiences and teaching strategies more often than those students using the traditional LMS discussion board. While the data are encouraging, limitations of this study encourage additional research in the areas of discussion platform, discussion group size, and group assignment methods.

References

Akcaoglu, Mete, and Eunbae Lee. 2016. “Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17, no. 3: 1–17.

Aloni, Maya, and Christine Harrington. 2018. “Research Based Practices for Improving the Effectiveness of Asynchronous Online Discussion Boards.” Scholarship of Teaching & Learning in Psychology 4, no. 4: 271–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000121.

Baker, David. 2010. “Improving Pedagogy for Online Discussions.” Business Education Innovation Journal 3, no. 2 December 2011: 26–29.

Bandura, Albert. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84, no. 2: 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brown, Amber. 2014. “Implementing Active Learning in an Online Teacher Education Course.” American Journal of Distance Education 28: 3, 170–82.

Dahlstrom, Eden, D. Christopher Brooks, and Jacqueline Bichsel. 2014. “The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives.” Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR, September 2014. Available from http://www.educause.edu/ecar.

Delahunty, Janine. 2018. “Connecting to Learn, Learning to Connect: Thinking Together in Asynchronous Forum Discussion.” Linguistics and Education 46, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingted.2018.05.003.

Ebadi, Saman, and Masoud Rahimi. 2017. “Exploring the Impact of Online Peer-Editing Using Google Docs on EFL Learners’ Academic Writing Skills: A Mixed Methods Study.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 30, no. 8: 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056.

Gao, Fei, Charles Xiaoxue Wang, and Yanling Sun. 2009. “A New Model of Productive Online Discussion and its Implication for Research and Discussion.” The Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2, 1, 65–78.

Gao, Fei, Tianyi Zhang, and Teresa Franklin. 2013. “Designing Asynchronous Online Discussion Environments: Recent Progress and Possible Future Directions.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44, no. 3:, 469–83.

Garrison, D. Randy, Terry Anderson, and Walter Archer. 2003. “A Theory of Critical Inquiry in Online Distance Education.” In M.G. Moore and W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, 113–27. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Green, Susan, and Robert Johnson. 2010. Assessment is Essential. New York; McGraw-Hill.

Hara, Noriko, Curtis Bonk, and Charoula Angeli. 2000. “Content Analysis of Online Discussion in an Applied Educational Psychology Course.” Instructional Science 28, no. 2:, 115–52.

Henri, France. 1992. “Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis.” In: Kaye A.R. (eds) Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), vol. 90. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77684-7.

Ho, Chia-Huan, and Karen Swan. 2007. “Evaluating Online Conversation in an Asynchronous Learning Environment: An Application of Grice’s Cooperative Principle.” The Internet and Higher Education 10, no. 1:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.11.002.

Krathwohl, David. 2002. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41, no. 4: 212–18.

Lee, Joohi, and Lesisa Martin. 2017. “Investigating Students’ Perceptions of Motivating Factors of Online Class Discussions.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18, no. 5.

Leflay, Kathryn, and Mark Groves. 2013. “Using Online Forums for Encouraging Higher Order Thinking and ‘Deep’ Learning in an Undergraduate Sports Sociology Module.” Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 13, 226–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2012.06.001.

Levy, Yair. 2008. “An Empirical Development of Critical Value Factors (CVF) of Online Learning Activities: An Application of Activity Theory and Cognitive Value Theory.” Computers and Education 51, no. 4: 1664–75.

Lin, Yu-Tzu, Chia-Hu Chang, Huei-Tse Hou, and Ke-Chou Wu. 2016. “Exploring the Effects of Employing Google Docs in Collaborative Concept Mapping on Achievement, Concept Representation, and Attitudes.” Interactive Learning Environments 24, no. 7: 1552–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1041398.

Marton, Ference, Gloria Dall’Alba, and Elizabeth Beaty. 1993. “Conceptions of Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 227–300.

Neumann, Kalianne, and Theodore Kopcha. 2019. “Using Google Docs for Peer-Then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing.” Computers and Composition, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524.

Poulou, Maria. 2007. “Personal Teaching Efficacy and its Sources: Student Teachers’ Perceptions.” Educational Psychology 27, no. 9: 191–218.

Schunk, Dale H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. (6th Ed.) Boston: Pearson.

Sudrajat, Winny Nur Ardy, and Pupung Purnawarman. 2019. “Students’ Perceptions on the Use of Google Docs as an Online Collaborative Tool in Translation Class.” Lingua Cultura 13, no. 3: 209–16.

Vygotsky, Lev. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.