The Place of Research Paradigms in SoTL Practice: An Inquiry

  • Neil Haigh EdQuest
  • Andrew John Withell Auckland University of Technology
Keywords: SoTL, researcher reflexivity, research paradigm, inquiry

Abstract

Research paradigms constitute views that a researcher holds about (a) the nature of reality and what they can know about it (that is, ontology); (b) the potential influence of their existing ideas and values on what they want to know, how they try to get to know, and criteria they use to make judgments about knowledge (epistemology); and (c) appropriate strategies for developing and evaluating knowledge (methodology). These views may influence their conception, design, implementation, and accounts of research projects. Critical self-reflection (reflexivity) is required to recognize these views and articulate their implications for projects. As scholars of teaching and learning, we attend explicitly to these views and their implications for our projects. However, our observation of  practice in the field of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) in general, as documented in publications, indicates that while some colleagues attend to such views and implications, others do not. This observation prompted us to explore the extent to which journal-based accounts of SoTL projects refer to paradigm-related views and possible explanations for the attention that their authors do, or do not, give to this consideration. Explanations proposed include conceptions of SoTL, journal author guidelines and review criteria, and properties of the concept of a paradigm. Recommendations for educating new SoTL practitioners about research paradigms and their possible relevance to SoTL, based on our inquiry, are also presented.

Author Biographies

Neil Haigh, EdQuest

Neil Haigh has been a university teacher, researcher, SoTL practitioner and mentor, director of a university Teaching and Learning Development Unit and co-designer of a National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence - Ako Aotearoa. (NZL).

Andrew John Withell, Auckland University of Technology

Andrew Withell is Head of School, Art and Design at Auckland University of Technology (NZL). His research focuses on creating empowering learning environments and curricula for art and design, and design thinking contexts.  

References

Berenson, Carol. 2018. “Identifying a Tradition of Inquiry: Articulating Research Assumptions.” In SoTL in Action: Illuminating Critical Moments in Practice, edited by Nancy L. Chick, 42–51. Sterling: Stylus.

Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Leeds Books.

Cambridge, Barbara L. 2001. “Fostering the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Communities of Practice.” In To Improve the Academy Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development, vol. 20, edited by Devorah Lieberman and Catherine M. Wehlburg, 3–16. Bolton: Anker.

Chick, Nancy L. 2014. “‘Methodologically Sound’ under the ‘Big Tent’: An Ongoing Conversation.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 8, no. 2: Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080201.

Felten, Peter. 2013. “Principles of Good Practice in SoTL.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 1, no. 1: 121–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121.

Finlay, Linda, and Brendan Gough. 2003. “Prologue,” in Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences, edited by Linda Finlay and Brendam Gough, ix–xi. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Fraser, Kym, and Ekaterina Pechenkina. 2016. “Research Paradigms Underlying SoTL Papers: A Comparative Analyses of Two Journals.” In Methods and Paradigms in Education Research, edited by Lorraine Ling and Peter Ling, 42–52. Hershey: IGI Global.

Glassick, Charles E., Mary Taylor Huber, and Gene I. Maeroff 1997. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Grant, Barbara M., and Lynne S. Giddings. 2002. “Making Sense of Methodologies: A Paradigm Framework for the Novice Researcher.” Contemporary Nurse 13, no. 1: 10–28. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.13.1.10.

Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 105–17. London: Sage.

Haigh, Neil. 2010. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Practical Introduction and Critique.” Wellington: Ako Aotearoa and the National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence. https://ako.ac.nz/assets/Knowledge-centre/Scholarship-of-teaching-and-learning/SUMMARY-REPORT-The-Scholarship-of-Teaching-and-Learning-a-Practical-Introduction-and-Critique.pdf.

Haigh, Neil. 2015. Designing Research Projects to Improve Learning and Teaching. Resource Handbook for Ako Aotearoa Professional Development Workshop. Wellington: Ako Aotearoa. https://ako.ac.nz/knowledge-centre/designing-research-projects-to-improve-teaching-and-learning/resource-handbook/.

Healey, Mick. (2003). “The Scholarship of Teaching: Issues around an Evolving Concept.”

Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 14, no. 2/3: 5–26.

Huball, Harry, and Anthony Clarke. 2010. “Diverse Methodological Approaches and Considerations for SoTL in Higher Education.” Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning/La revue canadienne sur l’avancement des connaissances en enseignement et en apprentissage 1, no. 1: Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.2.

Kelly, Niamh, Susan Nesbit, and Carolyn Oliver. 2012. “A Difficult Journey: Transitioning from STEM to SoTL.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6, no. 1: Article 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060118.

McKinney, Kathleen. 2004. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Past Lessons, Current Challenges, and Future Visions.” In To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development, vol. 22, edited by Catherine M. Wehlburg and Sandra Chadwick-Blossey, 3–19. Bolton: Anker.

Meyer, Jan H. F., and Ray Land. 2003. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising.” In Improving Student Learning—Ten Years On: Proceedings of the 2002 10th International Symposium Improving Student Learning, edited by Chris Rust, 412–24. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Meyer, Samantha, and Belinda Lunnay. 2013. “The Application of Abductive and Retroductive Inference for the Design and Analysis of Theory-Driven Sociological Research.” Sociological Research Online 18, no. 1: 86–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.2819.

Miller-Young, Janice, and Yeo, Michelle. 2015. “Conceptualizing and Communicating SoTL: A Framework for the Field.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 3, no. 2: 37–53. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.37.

O’Brien, Mia. 2008. “Threshold Concepts for University Teaching and Learning: A Study of Troublesome Knowledge and Thinking in the Teaching of Threshold Concepts.” Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines, edited by Ray Land, Jan H. F. Meyer, and Jan Smith, 289–306. Rotterdam: Sense.

Potter, Michael K., and Brad Wuetherick. 2015. “Who is Represented in the Teaching Commons? SoTL through the Lenses of the Arts and Humanities.” Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning/La revue canadienne sur l’avancement des connaissances en enseignement et en apprentissage 6, no. 2: Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.2.2.

Rowland Susan L., and Paula M. Myatt. 2014. “Getting Started in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A ‘How to’ Guide for Science Academics.” Biochemistry Molecular Biology Education 42, no. 1: 6–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20748.

Simmons, Nicola, Earle Abrahamson, Jessica M. Deschler, Barbara Kensington-Miller, Karen Manarin, Sue Morón-García, Carolyn Oliver, and Joanna Renc-Roe. 2013. “Conflicts and Configurations in a Liminal Space: SoTL Scholars’ Identity Development.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 1, no. 2: 9–21. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.9.

Tajfel, Henri., & Turner, John. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Inter-group Conflict”. The Social Psychology of Inter-group Relations, edited by William Austin and Stephen Worchel, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Tierney, Anne Margaret. 2017. “Threshold Concepts in Academic Practice: Engagement with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 12, no. 2: 165–84.

Wankat, Phillip C., Richard M. Felder, Karl A. Smith, and Frank. S. Oreovicz. 2002. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Engineering.” Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground, edited by Mary Taylor Huber and Sherwyn P. Morreale, 217–38. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Webb, Andrea Suzanne. (2015). “Threshold Concepts in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Phenomenological Study of Educational Leaders in a Canadian Research Intensive University.” PhD diss., University of British Colombia. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0167152.

Withell, Andrew. 2016. “Conceptualising, Evaluating and Enhancing a Design Thinking Curriculum Using a Critical Realist Perspective.” PhD diss., Auckland University of Technology. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/9916.

Yeo, Michelle, Karen Manarin, and Janice Miller-Young. 2018. “Phenomenology of Surprise: Transformed ‘Seeing’ in a SoTL Scholars’ Program.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 6, no. 2: 16–28. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.3.

Published
2020-10-06
How to Cite
Haigh, Neil, and Andrew John Withell. 2020. “The Place of Research Paradigms in SoTL Practice: An Inquiry ”. Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.3.