Facilitators and Barriers to Engagement and Effective SoTL Research Collaborations in Faculty Learning Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.5Keywords:
faculty learning community, collaborative research, collaboration strategies, teaching center support for SoTLAbstract
To determine factors that influence faculty engagement and success in faculty learning communities focused on collaborative Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), our project gathered information on (1) faculty motivation to engage with SoTL; (2) structures that support collaboration; (3) the perceived impact of SoTL on teaching, scholarship, and faculty engagement in academic communities on campus and beyond; and (4) the role of the teaching center in supporting collaborative faculty learning communities focused on SoTL. In this explanatory, sequential design mixed-methods study, participants were asked to complete a survey on their experience as participants in faculty learning communities at a large comprehensive public university in the southeastern United States; researchers then conducted one-on-one interviews with select participants to gain an in-depth understanding of trends and questions emerging from the survey data. Results indicate that personal, institutional, professional, and team factors contribute to participants’ perception of the success and effectiveness of collaborative research teams. Findings from the study offer guidance for setting up effective collaborative structures for SoTL projects and nurturing inter-disciplinary research among faculty members, thus providing insights that can inform the design and facilitation of similar programs in the United States and internationally.
References
Amundsen, Cheryl, Esma Emmioglu, Veronica Hotton, Gregory Hum, and Cindy Xin. 2016. “The Intentional Design of a SoTL Initiative.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2016, no. 146: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20184.
Boose, David L., and Pat Hutchings. 2016. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as a Subversive Activity.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 4, no. 1: 40–51. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.1.6.
Boyer, Ernest L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Cox, Milton D. 2004. “Introduction to Faculty Learning Communities.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2004, no. 97: 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.129.
Creswell, John. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Creswell, John, and Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cross, K. Patricia. 1998. “Why Learning Communities? Why Now?” About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience 3, no. 3: 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/108648229800300303.
Demb, Ada, and Amy Wade. 2012. “Reality Check: Faculty Involvement in Outreach and Engagement.” Journal of Higher Education 83, no. 3: 337–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2012.11777247.
Dich, Linh, Karen M. Browns, Jeff H. Kuznekoff, Theresa Conover, John P. Forren, and Janet Marshall. 2017. “Growing Lemon Trees from Lemons: Lessons Reaped from a SoTL Faculty Learning Community’s Research ‘Failures.’” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 17, no. 4: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v17i4.21377.
Fisher, Beth A., Michelle D. Repice, Carolyn L. Dufault, Denise A. Leonard, and Regina F. Frey. 2014. “Developing Scholarly Teachers through an SoTL Faculty Fellowship.” To Improve the Academy 33, no 2: 175–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20011.
Hodges, Linda C. 2013. “Postcards from the Edge of SoTL: A View from Faculty Development.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1, no. 1: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.71.
Hubball, Harry, Anthony Clarke, and Gary Poole. 2010. “Ten‐Year Reflections on Mentoring SoTL Research in a Research‐Intensive University.” International Journal for Academic Development 15 no. 2: 117–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601441003737758.
Huber, Mary Taylor, and Pat Hutchings. 2006. “Building the Teaching Commons.” Change 38, no. 3: 24–31. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.38.3.24-31.
Hutchings, Pat, Mary Taylor Huber, and Anthony Ciccone. 2011. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kahn, Peter, Christos Petichakis, and Lorraine Walsh. 2012. “Developing the Capacity of Researchers for Collaborative Working.” International Journal for Researcher Development 3, no. 1: 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511211278643.
Marquis, Elizabeth. 2015. “Developing SoTL through Organized Scholarship Institutes.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 3, no. 2: 19–36. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.19.
Mårtensson, Katerina. 2014. “Influencing Teaching and Learning Microcultures.” PhD diss., Lund University. https://portal.research.lu.se/ws/files/3403041/4438677.pdf.
Mattessich, Paul W., Marta Murray-Close, and Barbara R. Monsey. 2001. Collaboration: What Makes it Work. A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration. 2nd ed. St. Paul: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
Maurer, Trent, Diana Struges, Padmini Shankar, Deborah Allen, and Saida Akbarova. 2010. “A Faculty Learning Community on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Case Study.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 4, no. 2, article 8. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040208.
McDermott, Richard. 1999. “Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management.” California Management Review 41, no. 4: 103–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166012.
Miller-Young, Janice E., Michelle Yeo, and Karen Manarin. 2018. “Challenges to Disciplinary Knowing and Identity: Experiences of Scholars in a SoTL Development Program.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 12, no. 1, article 3. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120103.
Potter, Michael K. and Erika D. H. Kustra. 2011. “The Relationship between Scholarly Teaching and SoTL: Models, Distinctions, and Clarifications.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 5, no. 1, article 23. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050123.
Richlin, Laurie, and Milton D. Cox. 2004. “Developing Scholarly Teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning through Faculty Learning Communities.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2004, no. 97: 127–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.139.
Schwartz, Beth M., and Aeron Haynie. 2013. “Faculty Development Centers and the Role of SoTL.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2013, no. 136: 101–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20079.
Simmons, Nicola, Earle Abrahamson, Jessica M. Deshler, Barbara Kensington-Miller, Karen Manarin, Sue Morón-García, Carolyn Oliver, and Joanna Renc-Roe. 2013. “Conflicts and Configurations in a Liminal Space: SoTL Scholars’ Identity Development.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1, no. 2: 9–21. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.2.9.
Trigwell, Keith. “Evidence of the Impact of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Purposes.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1, no. 1 (2013): 95–105. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.95.
Wade, Amy, and Ada Demb. 2009. “A Conceptual Model to Explore Faculty Community Engagement.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 15, no. 2: 5–16. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjcsl/3239521.0015.201/1.
Yeo, Michelle, Karen Manarin, and Janice Miller-Young. 2018. “Phenomenology of Surprise: Transformed ‘Seeing’ in a SoTL Scholars’ Program. Teaching & Learning Inquiry 6, no. 2: 16–28. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Claudia A. Cornejo Happel, Xiaomei Song
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
