Educational equipoise and the educational misconception: Lessons from bioethics


  • Gil Hersch Virginia Tech



research ethics, educational equipoise, educational misconception, bioethics


Some advances in bioethics regarding ethical considerations that arise in the context of medical research can also be relevant when thinking about the ethical considerations that arise in the context of SoTL research. In this article, I aim to bring awareness to two potential ethical challenges SoTL researchers might face when playing a dual role of teacher and researcher that are similar to the challenges physicians face in their dual role of physician and researcher. I argue that two commonly discussed concerns in bioethics—the need for clinical equipoise and the possibility of a therapeutic misconception—have analogies when conducting some types of research on students. I call these counterparts educational equipoise and the educational misconception.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Gil Hersch, Virginia Tech

Gil Hersch is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Philosophy and the Program in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (USA).


American Association of University Professors & Association of American Colleges (1970). 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure, with 1970 Interpretive Comments. Retrieved from

Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L.H., & Lidz. C. (1982). The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5(3-4), 319-329.

Burman, M. E. & Kleinsasser, A. (2004). Ethical guidelines for use of student work: Moving from teaching’s invisibility to inquiry’s visibility in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Journal of General Education, 53(1), 59–79.

Cartwright, N. (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties, 2(1), 11-20.

Dresser, R. (2002). The ubiquity and utility of the therapeutic misconception. Social Philosophy & Policy, 19(2), 271-294.

Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good SoTL practice. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125.

Fenton, N. E. & Szala-Meneok, K., (2010). Research on Teaching and Learning Guidebook. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University.

Freedman, B. (1987). Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 317(3), 3-16.

Gurung, R. A. R., & Schwartz, B. M. (2009). Optimizing Teaching and Learning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hersch, G. (2015). Experimental economics’ inconsistent ban on deception. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 52, 13-19.

Hutchings, P. (2003). Competing goods: Ethical issues in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Change, 35(5), 26-33.

Leentjens, A. F. G., & Levenson, J. L. (2013). Ethical issues concerning the recruitment of university students as research subjects. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 75(4), 394-398.

Martin, R. C. (2013). Navigating the IRB: The ethics of SoTL. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(136), 59-71.

McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing Learning Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.

Miller, F. G. & Brody, H. (2003). A critique of clinical equipoise: Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Center Report, 33(3). 19-28.

Pritchard, l. A. (2002). Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3-13.

Regehr, G. (2010). It’s NOT rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Medical Education, 44(1), 31-39.

Smith, R. (2008). Moving toward the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The classroom can be a lab, too! Teaching of Psychology, 35(4), 262-266.

Smith, R. A. (2012). Benefits of using SoTL in picking and choosing pedagogy. In B.M. Schwartz & R. A. R. Gurung (Eds.), Evidence-based Teaching for Higher Education (pp. 7-22). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Swenson, E. & McCarthy, M. (2012). Ethically conducting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning research. In R. E. Landrum & M. A. McCarthy (Eds.), Teaching Ethically: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 21-29). Washington, DC: American psychological Association.




How to Cite

Hersch, Gil. 2018. “Educational Equipoise and the Educational Misconception: Lessons from Bioethics”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 6 (2):3-15.