Developing reflective practice in teacher candidates through program coherence

Authors

  • Kathryn L. Allen University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
  • Katherine Brodeur Bowling Green State University
  • Madeleine Heins Israelson College of Saint Benedict/St. John's University
  • Keitha-Gail Martin-Kerr University of Minnesota
  • Lisa Ortmann University of North Dakota
  • Debra S. Peterson University of Minnesota

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.7

Keywords:

reflection, teacher education, pedagogy

Abstract

In this study, we explored the role of reflection at three stages of preparation across a teacher education program. Reflection has long been considered an essential aspect of professional practice for teaching; however, reflection is often vague and undefined. Through an examination of the opportunities we provided for our students to reflect, and systematic analysis of the levels of reflection our students engaged in, we found that the development of reflective practices could be understood and aligned across a professional preparation program. Furthermore, we considered our own pedagogical practices related to modality, prompting, scaffolding, assignment structure, and feedback in our analysis of a variety of student reflection artifacts, in order to understand the potential impact of our own pedagogical decisions across the program. Findings suggest that the program provided modeling and structures for reflection early on, encouraged the inclusion of multiple perspectives in relation to professional practice, and supported a synthesis of student learning of theory and practice as preservice teachers approached program completion. This article offers reflection as a tool for exploring issues of professional growth across a continuum of development.

Author Biographies

Kathryn L. Allen, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh

Kathryn L. Allen is an assistant professor in the Department of Literacy and Language at the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh (USA). Her research interests include teacher learning and the integration of technology in literacy education

Katherine Brodeur, Bowling Green State University

Katherine Brodeur is an assistant professor in the School of Teaching and Learning at Bowling Green State University (USA). Her research interests include teacher learning and adolescents who experience difficulty with school literacies.

Madeleine Heins Israelson, College of Saint Benedict/St. John's University

Madeleine Heins lsraelson is an assistant professor at the College of Saint Benedict/St. John’s University (USA). Her research interests include social justice and equity in teacher preparation and the integration of technology in literacy teaching and learning.

Keitha-Gail Martin-Kerr, University of Minnesota

Keitha-Gail Martin-Kerr is a Lecturer in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Minnesota (USA). Her research interest is in the area of literacy pedagogy in and out of school settings.

Lisa Ortmann, University of North Dakota

Lisa Ortmann is Assistant Professor of Literacy Education at The University of North Dakota (USA). Her research focuses on teacher preparation and development and K-12 disciplinary literacy instruction.

Debra S. Peterson, University of Minnesota

Debra S. Peterson is a Senior Education Specialist at Minnesota Center for Reading Research at the University of Minnesota (USA). Publications include articles in Reading Research Quarterly, Elementary School Journal, and the Reading Teacher. Awards include the International Literacy Association Albert I Harris award for reading research.

References

Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do (pp. 1¬39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K. (2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing Teachers fora Changing World: What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do (pp. 40-87). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Clarà, M. (2014). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487114552028

Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education, (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Freese, A. R. (2006). Reframing one’s teaching: discovering our teacher selves through reflection and inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 100-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.003

Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J., (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing Teachers fora Changing World: What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do (pp. 390-440). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hayden, H. E., & Chiu, M. M. (2013). Lessons learned: Supporting the development of reflective practice and adaptive expertise. In P. J. Dunston et al. (Eds.) 62nd Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association (pp. 279-296). Altamonte Springs: Literacy Research Association.

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12-21. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1176776

Jarvis-Selinger, S., Pratt, D., & Regehr, G. (2012). Competency is not enough: Integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1185-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182604968

Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004

Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271¬283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533386

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Nelson, F. L. & Sadler, T. (2013). A third space for reflection by teacher educators: A heuristic for understanding orientations to and components of reflection. Reflective Practice, 14(1), 43-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732946

Panos, A. (2015). Reflections from preservice to novice teaching: One perspective on the role of ePortfolios.

Theory into Practice, 54(4), 292-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1076692

Parkinson, P. T. (2008). Field-based preservice teacher research: Facilitating reflective professional practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 798-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.017

Risko, V. J., Vukelich, C., & Roskos, K. (2009). Detailing reflection instruction: The efficacy of a guided instructional procedure on prospective teachers’ pedagogical reasoning. Action in Teacher Education, 31(2), 47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2009.10463517

Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2007). Learning to teach science. In S. K. Abell & N. C. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 1151-1178). Mahwah: Lawrence Earl baum.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.), (2005). Knowledge to Support the Teaching of Reading: Preparing Teachers for a Changing World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wade, S. E., Fauske, J. R., & Thompson, A. (2008). Prospective teachers’ problem solving in online peer-led dialogues. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 398-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308224

Wake, D., & Bunn, G. (2016) Teacher candidate dispositions: Perspectives of professional expectations. Teacher Educator, 51(1), 33-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2015.1107440

Downloads

Published

2018-09-25

How to Cite

Allen, Kathryn L., Katherine Brodeur, Madeleine Heins Israelson, Keitha-Gail Martin-Kerr, Lisa Ortmann, and Debra S. Peterson. 2018. “Developing Reflective Practice in Teacher Candidates through Program Coherence”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 6 (2):81-96. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.7.