Public pedagogy and representations of higher education in popular film: New ground for the scholarship of teaching and learning

Authors

  • Katelyn Johnstone McMaster University
  • Elizabeth Marquis McMaster University
  • Varun Puri McMaster University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.4

Keywords:

public pedagogy, popular film, media representations, higher education, instructor-student relationships, academic identities, disciplinary differences

Abstract

Constructions of teaching, learning, and the university within popular culture can exert an important influence on public understandings of higher education, including those held by faculty and students. As such, they constitute a rich site of inquiry for the scholarship of teaching and learning. Drawing on the notion of film as ‘public pedagogy,’ this article analyses representations of higher education within 11 top grossing and/or critically acclaimed films released in 2014. We identify three broad themes across these texts—the purpose of higher education, relationships between students and professors, and the creation of academic identities—and consider the implications and functions of these representational patterns for teaching, learning, and SoTL. Particular attention is given to the difference between the framing of science and arts and humanities disciplines, and to how this might resonate with the contemporary ‘crisis of the humanities.’

Author Biographies

Katelyn Johnstone, McMaster University

Katelyn Johnstone is a student in the Arts & Science program at McMaster University and a student partner at McMaster’s Paul R. MacPherson Institute for Leadership, Innovation, and Excellence in Teaching.

Elizabeth Marquis, McMaster University

Elizabeth Marquis is an Assistant Professor in the Arts & Science program at McMaster University and Associate Director (Research) at McMaster's Paul R. MacPherson Institute for Leadership, Innovation, and Excellence in Teaching.

Varun Puri, McMaster University

Varun Puri is a graduate of the Arts & Science program at McMaster University and a student partner at McMaster’s Paul R. MacPherson Institute for Leadership, Innovation, and Excellence in Teaching.

References

Barnett, R. (2014). Imagining the humanities—amid the inhuman. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 13(1-2), 42-53.

Belfiore, E. (2015). ‘Impact,’ ‘value,’ and ‘bad economics’: Making sense of the problem of value in the arts and humanities. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 14(1): 95-110.

Bennett, R., Hobson, J., Jones, A., Martin-Lynch, P., Scutt, C., Strehlow, K., & Veitch, S. (2016). Being chimaera: A monstrous identity for SoTL academics. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(2), 217-228.

Benneworth, P. (2015). Putting impact into context: The Janus face of the public value of arts and humanities research. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 14(1), 3-8.

Benton, S. (2013). Two heads are better than one (and three are better than two): Challenging the individualist ethos of the educator-hero film. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 41(2), 98–108.

Bloch-Schulman, S., & Linkon, S.L. (2016). Scholarship of teaching and learning in the arts and humanities: Moving the conversation forward. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(1), 1-3.

Bloch-Schulman, S., Wharton Conkling, S., Linkon, S.L., Manarin, K., & Perkins, K. (2016). Asking bigger questions: An invitation to further conversation. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(1), 1-7.

Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.

Carens, T.L. (2010). Serpents in the garden: English professors in contemporary film and television. College English, 73(1), 9-27.

Chick, N.L. (2013). Difference, privilege, and power in the scholarship of teaching and learning: The value of Humanities SoTL. In K. McKinney (ed.), The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in and Across the Disciplines (pp. 15-33). Bloomington: Indiana UP.

Cook-Sather, A., & Abbot, S. (2016). Translating partnerships: How faculty-student collaboration in explorations of teaching and learning can transform perceptions, terms, and selves. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-14.

Cote, J. & Allahar, A.L. (2011). Lowering Higher Education: The Rise of Corporate Universities and the Fall of Liberal Education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Dalton, M.M. (2006). Revising the Hollywood curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 3(2), 29-34.

Degn, L. (2015). Identity constructions and sensemaking in higher education - A case study of Danish higher education department heads. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1179-1193.

Evans, M. (2014). Liberal values at a time of neo-liberalism. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 13(1-2), 17-23.

Fanghanel, J. (2012). Being an Academic. London: Routledge.

Fanghanel, J. (2009). The role of ideology in shaping academics’ conceptions of their discipline. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 565-577.

García, J. (2015). Learning from bad teachers: The neoliberal agenda for education in popular media. Critical Education, 6(13). http://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/184935

Giroux, H. (2004). Pedagogy, film, and the responsibility of intellectuals: A response. Cinema Journal, 43(2), 119-127.

Giroux, H. (2008). Hollywood film as public pedagogy: Education in the crossfire. Afterimage, 35(5), 7-13.

Gregory, M. (2007). Real teaching and real learning vs narrative myths about education. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 6(1), 7-27.

Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-13.

Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1-2), 155-176.

Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.

Leuschner, E. (2006). Body damage: Dis-figuring the academic in academic fiction. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 28(3-4), 339-354.

Maclellan, E. (2015). Updating understandings of ‘teaching’: Taking account of learners’ and teachers’ beliefs. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(2), 171-182.

McArthur, J. (2011). Reconsidering the social and economic purposes of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 737-749.

Paakkari, L., Tynjälä, P., & Kannas, L. (2011). Critical aspects of student teachers’ conceptions of learning. Learning and Instruction, 21, 705-714.

Potter, M.K. & Wuetherick, B. (2015). Who is represented in the teaching commons? SoTL through the lenses of the arts and humanities. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 6(2), page

Seamus, M. & Mackler, S. (2015). The existential significance of cinema in educational administration. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 49(2), 1-19.

Stillwagon, J. & Jelinek, D. (2015). A note on the scandals: The role of filmic fantasy in reproducing teaching and its transgressions. In T.E. Lewis & M.J. Laverty (eds.), Art’s Teachings, Teaching’s Art: Philosophical, Critical and Educational Musings (pp.89-103). New York: Springer.

Sutton, P. (2015). A paradoxical academic identity: Fate, utopia and critical hope. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 37-47.

Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (2014). Qualitative variation in constructive alignment in curriculum design. Higher Education, 67, 141-154.

Vandermeersche, G., Soetaert, R. & Rutten, K. (2013). “Shall I tell you what is wrong with Hector as a teacher?”: The History Boys, stereotypes of popular and high culture, and teacher education. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 41(2), 88-97.

Wright, R.R. & Sandlin, J.A. (2009). Cult TV, hip hop, shape-shifters, and vampire slayers: A review of the literature at the intersection of adult education and popular culture. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(2), 118-141.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-20

How to Cite

Johnstone, Katelyn, Elizabeth Marquis, and Varun Puri. 2018. “Public Pedagogy and Representations of Higher Education in Popular Film: New Ground for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 6 (1):25-37. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.4.