Down the SoTL rabbit hole: Using a phenomenological approach to parse the development of student actors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.1.9Keywords:
Acting Theory, Embodied Experience, Phenomenology, Actor TrainingAbstract
Theatre is a multi-dimensional discipline encompassing aspects of several domains in the arts and humanities. Therefore, an array of scholarly practices, pedagogies, and methods might be available to a SoTL researcher from the close reading of texts in script analysis to portfolio critiques in set, costume, and lighting design—approaches shared with the humanities and the visual arts. For those studying the learning processes involved in developing actors, however, this article argues that it is necessary to go beyond the cognitive elements of the process and turn to the very experiential nature of performance to capture kinetic and affective learning. While basic voice, movement, and acting skills can be built on repetition and evaluated with critical rubrics, in order to capture the learning processes involved in the integration of cognition, voice, body, and emotion (affect), we have to use the reflective habits of mind present in theatrical culture. One approach to gathering reflective data for such studies is phenomenology. This article describes several SoTL inquiries into the experiential nature of performance. It argues that, depending on the research question at hand, phenomenological reports on developing acting skills intersecting with demonstrations of cognitive analysis and external performance critiques not only provide a rich data stew for analysis but deeper insight into the learning processes of the developing performer.
References
Bleeker, M., Sherman, J., & Nedelkopoulou, E. (Eds.) (2015). Performance and Phenomenology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Diderot, D. (1830). Paradoxe sur le Comedien. English translation by Walter Herries Pollock (1883). London: Chatto & Windus.
Gallagher, S., & Zohavi, D. (2012). The Phenomenological Mind. (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
Gordon, Robert (2006). The Purpose of Playing: Modern Acting Theories In Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Johnston, D. (2011). Stanislavskian acting as phenomenology in practice. Journal of dramatic theory and criticism, 26(1), 65-84.
Kemp, R. (2012). Embodied Acting: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Performance. London, England: Routledge.
Klebesadel, H. & Kornetsky, L. (2009). Critique as signature pedagogy in the arts. In R.A.R. Gurung, N. Chick, A. Haynie (Eds.), Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind (pp. 99-117). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Lutterbie, J. (2011). Towards a General Theory of Acting: Cognitive Sciences and Performance. New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
McConachie, B., & Hart, F. E. (Eds.) (2004). Performance and Cognition: Theatre Studies and the Cognitive Turn. London, England: Routledge.
McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing Learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The Challenges and Joys of Juggling. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Shaw, George Bernard (1919). Heartbreak House. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Zarrilli, P. (2007). An enactive approach to understanding acting. Theatre journal 59, 635-47.
Zarrilli, P., Daboo, J., & Loukes, R. (Eds.). (2013). Acting: Psychophysical Phenomenon and Process. London and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.