To teach is to learn twice: The power of a blended peer mentoring approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.7Keywords:
Peer Mentoring, Facilitation, Assessment, Environment, Professional ResponsibilitiesAbstract
Two students at a Canadian university perceived there was a lack of opportunities for peer mentoring support in their teacher education program. They approached a faculty member to co-create and research a blended peer mentoring support program embedded in a first-year education course. This study documents the journey of these two students as co-inquirers in a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) project. Through online surveys and interviews, first-year teacher candidates and faculty involved in the blended peer mentoring program identified four key benefits: new perspectives and expansion of ideas, positive and encouraging reinforcement, supportive connection with second-year students, and probing questions to think more deeply. Conversely, three major challenges were uncovered with the use of digital technologies to support this blended approach to peer mentoring: lack of email notification from the institution’s learning management system (LMS) with regards to the peer mentors’ online contributions, the impersonal nature of online peer mentoring, and the limited number of peer mentors. The major recommendation from this study was to create a blended program assignment to provide all second-year teacher candidates with the opportunity to learn how to serve as peer mentors to students just entering the teacher education program.
Metrics
References
Alberta Education. (2014). Task force for teaching excellence.
Alberta Government. (2013). Teaching quality standard applicable to the provision of basic education in Alberta.
Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel. July, 297-308.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 133-145.
Calvert, G. (1867). Some of the translated thoughts of Joseph Jobert. William V. Spencer: Boston.
Clandinin, D. J., Schaefer, L., Long, J. S., Steeves, P., McKenzie-Robblee, S., Pinnegar, E., & Wnuk, S. (2012). Early career teacher attrition: Problems, possibilities, potentials. University of Alberta: Edmonton.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching & Learning. 80, 75-82.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, Winter, 1-18.
Cook-Sather, A. (2011). Layered learning: Student consultants deepening classroom and life lessons. Educational Action Research, 19, 41-57.
Dweck, C. S. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books: New York, NY.
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121-125.
Friesen, S. (2009). What did you do in school today? Teaching effectiveness: A framework and rubric. Canadian Education Association: Toronto.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Healey M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: HE Academy
Heirdsfield, A. M., Walker, S., Walsh, K. M., & Wilss, L. A. (2008). Peer mentoring for first year teacher education students: The mentors' experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 16(2), 109-124.
Kilgo, C. A., Sheets, J. E., & Pascarella, E. T. (2013, November). Do high-impact practices actually have high-impact on student learning? Some initial findings. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, St. Louis, MO.
Le Cornu, R. (2007). Peer mentoring: Engaging pre-service teachers in mentoring one another. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 13 (3), 335-366
Murray-Harvey, R, Slee, P. T., Lawson, M. J., Silins, H., Banfield, G., & Russell, A. (1999). Under stress: The concerns and coping strategies of teacher education students. Adelaide, Australia: University of South Australia.
Mihans, R., Long, D., & Felten, P. (2008). Power and expertise: Student-faculty collaboration in course design and the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2, 1-9.
National Survey of Student Engagement (2011). Fostering student engagement campus wide—annual report 2011. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research.
Nickel, J. (2013). Self-assessment of professional growth through reflective portfolios. Phronesis, (2)1, 67-79.
Nora, A., & Crisp. G. (2007). Mentoring students: Conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system. Journal of College Student Retention, 9, 337-356.
OECD/CERI. (2008). Assessment for learning: Formative assessment. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
Pace, C. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education. 2, 10-16.
Parker, J. D. A., Summerfeldt, L. J., Hogan, M. J., & Majeski, S. A. (2004). Emotional intelligence and academic success: Examining the transition from high school to university. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (1), 163-172.
Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Student engagement: What do we know and what should we do? Edmonton: University of Alberta.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini. P. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Saint-Jacques, A. (2013). Effective teaching practices to foster vibrant communities of inquiry in synchronous online learning. In Z. Akyol, & D. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 84-108). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
Vaughan, N. D. (2016). A blended approach to teacher education. In (S. Keengwe Ed.), Handbook of research on global issues in next-generation teacher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D.R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.
Vaughan, N. D., LeBlanc, A., Zimmer, J., Naested, I., Nickel, J., Sikora, S., Sterenberg, G., & O’Connor, K. (2013). To be or not to be: Student and faculty perceptions of engagement in a blended Bachelor of Education program. In C. Dziuban, C. Graham, & A. G. Picciano (Eds.), Research perspectives in blended learning (pp. 104-121). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
Vaughan, N. D., Nickle, T., Silovs, J., & Zimmer, J. (2011). Moving to their own beat: Exploring how students use Web 2.0 technologies to support group work outside of class. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10, (3), 113-127.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Werder, C., Thibou, S., & Kaufer, B. (2012). Students as co-inquirers: A requisite threshold concept in educational development? Journal of Faculty Development, 26 (3), 34-38
Werder, C., & Otis, M. (Eds.). (2010). Engaging students in the study of teaching and learning. Sterling, Vermont: Stylus.
