Using the principles of SoTL to redesign an advanced evolutionary biology course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.1.15Keywords:
course resdesign, constructive alignment, critical thinking, reflective practicesAbstract
A primary goal of university instruction is the students’ demonstration of improved, highly developed critical thinking (CT) skills. However, how do faculty encourage CT and its potential concomitant increase in student workload without negatively impacting student perceptions of the course? In this investigation, an advanced biology course is evaluated after structural changes (implemented in 2010) met with a poor student evaluation of the course and the instructor. This analysis first examines the steps used to transform a course to encourage CT and then explains how it can be assessed. To accomplish these goals, the instructor collaborated with an educational developer to redesign the course using a philosophy informed by SoTL. This approach, as we see it, represents a set of principles that demand transparency in the development and application of strategies whose aim is to encourage student learning. However, the SoTL approach would be insufficient to simply promote a set of strategies without some mechanism for evaluating its efficacy. Therefore, we designed a “Graded Response” (GR) multiple-choice test to measure CT development and hence to properly evaluate whether the strategies embedded in our SoTL-informed course redesign have adequately met our goals.
Metrics
References
Abualrub, I., Karseth, B., & Stensaker, B. (2013). The various understandings of learning environment in higher education and its quality implications. Quality in Higher Education 19(1), 90-110. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2013.772464
Aldridge, J.M. & Fraser, B.J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research 3, 101-134.
Aldridge, J.M., Dorman, J.P., & Fraser, B.J. (2004). Use of multitrait-multimethod modelling to validate actual and preferred forms of the technology-rich outcomes-focused learning environment inventory (Troflei). Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology 4, 110-125. http://www.newcastle.edu.au/journal/ajedp/
Beachford, M.R. & Beachford, J.C. (2010). Critical-thinking pedagogy and student perceptions of university contributions to their academic development: International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 13, 53-71. http://www.inform.nu/Articles/Vol13/ISJv13p053-071Beachboard548.pdf
Bernstein, D.J. (2008). Peer review and evaluation of the intellectual work of teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(2), 48-51. doi: 10.3200/CHNG.40.2.48-51
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 32, 347-364.
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development 18(1), 57-75.
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does (3rd ed.). New York NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Blair, E. (2013). The challenge of contextualising the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 127-130. doi: 10.1353/iss.2013.0000
Brookfield, S.D. (1997). Assessing critical thinking. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 75, 17-29.
Covington, M. (1984). The motive for self-worth. Research on Motivation in Education, 1, 77-113, Orlando, Florida, Academic Press.
Entwistle, N. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. Paper presented at TLRP [Teaching & Learning Research Programme], Leicester, November 2000, 12pgs.
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121-125. doi: 10.1353/iss.2013.0013
Froyd, J. & Simpson, N. (2010). Student-centered learning addressing faculty questions about student-centered learning. Texas A&M University. http://ccliconference.org/files/2010/03/Froyd_Stu-CenteredLearning.pdf
Gardiner, L.F. (1998). Why we must change: the research evidence. The National Education Association Higher Education Journal (Spring 1998), 71-88.
Ghaye, T. (2011). Teaching and learning through reflective practice: a practical guide for positive action (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Haas, P.F. & Kelley, S.M. (1998). Coping with faculty resistance to teaching critical thinking. College Teaching, 46(2), 63-67.
Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Litjens, J., & Hounsell, J. (2005). Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses: subject overview – Biosciences, December 2005. The ETL project: Universities of Edinburgh, Coventry and Durham. 60 pgs. http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk//docs/BiosciencesSR.pdf
Keeley, S.M., Shemberg, K.M., Cowell, B.S., & Zinnbauer, B.J. (1995). Coping with student resistance to critical thinking. College Teaching, 43(4), 140-145.
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The perception of workload and task complexity and its influence on students’ approaches to learning: a study in higher education. European Journal of Psychology Education, 26, 393-415. doi: 10.1007/s10212-010-0053-2
Leshowitz, B., DiCerbo, K.E., & Symington, S. (1999). Effective thinking: an active-learning course in critical thinking. Current Issues in Education, 2(5), 1-12.
Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education 27(1), 27-52. doi:10.1080/03075070120099359
Magnussen, L., Ishida, D., & Itano, J. (2000). The impact of the use of inquiry-based learning as a teaching methodology on the development of critical thinking. Journal of Nursing Education 39(8), 360-364.
Mathews, S.R. & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom environments that foster a disposition for critical thinking. Learning Environments Research 14(1), 59-73. doi: 10.1007/s10984-011-9082-2
Morrison, H. (1997). Information literacy skills: an exploratory focus group study of student perceptions. Research Strategies, 15(1), 4-17.
Prideaux, D. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: curriculum design. British Medical Journal 326(7883), 268-270. doi: http://dx.doi.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1136/bmj.326.7383.268
Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46(2), 137-149. doi: 10.1080/0013188042000222421
Scott, W., Lisagor, T., & Marachi, R. (2009). Learning centered universities: the changing face of higher education. Journal of Faculty Development (23)1, 14-23.
Taylor, M.L. (2006). Generation NeXt comes to college: 2006 updates and emerging Issues. A Collection of Papers on Self-Study and Institutional Improvement - Arkansas State University-Beebe, 2, 48-55. https://www.msu.edu/~jdowell/pdf/Millennials.pdf
Thomas, T. (2011). Developing first year students’ critical thinking skills. Asian Social Science 7(4), 26-35. doi: 10.5539/ass.v7n4p26
Trigwell, K. (2013). Evidence of the impact of scholarship of teaching. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 95-105. doi: 10.1353/iss.2013.0004
Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: evidence from four institutional case studies. The Journal of Higher Education 73(6), 740-763. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2002.0056
Watson, G. & Glaser, E.M. (2006). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal (short form). Pearson Education Inc. San-Antonio, USA.
