When the Leviathan Devours
Law, Legitimacy, and the Experience of Sovereign Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55016/t689rd75Keywords:
Sovereignty, State Power, Political Theory, Leviathan (2014), AuthoritarianismAbstract
This paper examines Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Leviathan (2014) through Thomas Hobbes’s theory of sovereignty, asking what film can reveal about political power that political theory alone cannot fully capture. Hobbes conceptualizes the sovereign as an overwhelming but necessary authority capable of transforming insecurity and conflict into order. Zvyagintsev’s film complicates this account by depicting a political system in which order and functioning institutions persist while protection, accountability, and justice collapse. Through its portrayal of bureaucratic legality, coercive state power, religious legitimation, dispossession, and the erosion of private life, Leviathan transforms sovereignty from an abstract political structure into a lived experience. Particular attention is given to the film’s use of institutional ritual, landscape, silence, humiliation, and the recurring Leviathan imagery to communicate the emotional consequences of domination. The paper argues that when sovereign authority becomes fused with corruption and moral complicity, the Hobbesian protector can become a predator. Film therefore reveals how political power operates not only through institutions and law, but through emotion, dignity, identity, and the narrowing of possibilities for meaningful resistance.
References
Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism (New ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Original work published 1951). https://social-ecology.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Hannah-Arendt-The-Origins-of-Totalitarianism-Harcourt-Brace-Jovanovich-1973.pdf
Åslund, A. (2019). Russia’s crony capitalism: The path from market economy to kleptocracy. Yale University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, or the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought. https://historyofeconomicthought.mcmaster.ca/hobbes/Leviathan.pdf
Hristova, M. (2020). Corruption as shared culpability: Religion, family, and society in Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Leviathan (2014). The Journal of Religion and Film, 24(2), COV3–45. https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.24.2.001
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). The evolution of post-Soviet competitive authoritarianism. In Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War (pp. 183–235). Cambridge University Press.
Vassilieva, J. (2018). Russian Leviathan: Power, landscape, memory. Film Criticism. https://doi.org/10.3998/fc.13761232.0042.101
Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religion (E. Fischoff, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1922).
Zvyagintsev, A. (Director). (2014). Leviathan [Film]. Non-Stop Production.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Garima Chahal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Policy
The Motley Undergraduate Journal is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Share-Alike License. Under this license, users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and remix (adapt) the contribution, including for commercial purposes, providing that the original work is properly cited. Under Creative Commons, authors retain copyright in their articles.
Author Self Archiving Policy
Authors are permitted to post their work online in institutional/disciplinary repositories or on their own websites. Pre-print versions posted online should include a citation and link to the final published version in The Motley Undergraduate Journal as soon as the issue is available; post-print versions (including the final publisher's PDF) should include a citation and link to the journal's website.