When the Leviathan Devours

Law, Legitimacy, and the Experience of Sovereign Power

Authors

  • Garima Chahal University of Calgary student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55016/t689rd75

Keywords:

Sovereignty, State Power, Political Theory, Leviathan (2014), Authoritarianism

Abstract

This paper examines Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Leviathan (2014) through Thomas Hobbes’s theory of sovereignty, asking what film can reveal about political power that political theory alone cannot fully capture. Hobbes conceptualizes the sovereign as an overwhelming but necessary authority capable of transforming insecurity and conflict into order. Zvyagintsev’s film complicates this account by depicting a political system in which order and functioning institutions persist while protection, accountability, and justice collapse. Through its portrayal of bureaucratic legality, coercive state power, religious legitimation, dispossession, and the erosion of private life, Leviathan transforms sovereignty from an abstract political structure into a lived experience. Particular attention is given to the film’s use of institutional ritual, landscape, silence, humiliation, and the recurring Leviathan imagery to communicate the emotional consequences of domination. The paper argues that when sovereign authority becomes fused with corruption and moral complicity, the Hobbesian protector can become a predator. Film therefore reveals how political power operates not only through institutions and law, but through emotion, dignity, identity, and the narrowing of possibilities for meaningful resistance.

References

Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism (New ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Original work published 1951). https://social-ecology.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Hannah-Arendt-The-Origins-of-Totalitarianism-Harcourt-Brace-Jovanovich-1973.pdf

Åslund, A. (2019). Russia’s crony capitalism: The path from market economy to kleptocracy. Yale University Press.

Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, or the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thought. https://historyofeconomicthought.mcmaster.ca/hobbes/Leviathan.pdf

Hristova, M. (2020). Corruption as shared culpability: Religion, family, and society in Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Leviathan (2014). The Journal of Religion and Film, 24(2), COV3–45. https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.24.2.001

Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). The evolution of post-Soviet competitive authoritarianism. In Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War (pp. 183–235). Cambridge University Press.

Vassilieva, J. (2018). Russian Leviathan: Power, landscape, memory. Film Criticism. https://doi.org/10.3998/fc.13761232.0042.101

Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religion (E. Fischoff, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1922).

Zvyagintsev, A. (Director). (2014). Leviathan [Film]. Non-Stop Production.

Published

2026-11-09

Issue

Section

Research and Analytical Articles

How to Cite

When the Leviathan Devours: Law, Legitimacy, and the Experience of Sovereign Power. (2026). The Motley Undergraduate Journal , 4(2). https://doi.org/10.55016/t689rd75