The current utility and future use of the medical student performance record: A survey of perceptions across Canada

Authors

  • Kulamakan Kulasegaram University of Toronto
  • Melissa Hynes University of Toronto
  • Glen Bandiera University of Toronto
  • Patricia Houston University of Toronto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.69332

Abstract

Introduction: The MSPR is a Canada wide tool that provides aggregate information on MD students’ performance during training and used widely as part of PG admissions. This survey study elicits the perceptions of PG admissions stakeholders on the current use and future utility of the MSPR in Canada.

Methods: PG admissions stakeholders across the faculties of medicine were convenience sampled for a 15-question online survey in the fall of 2018. Participants were asked how and when the MSPR is incorporated into the admissions process and perceptions and recommendations for improvement Data are summarized descriptively and thematically.

Results: Responses came from 164 participants across the 17 faculties of medicine. The MSPR was widely used (92%), most commonly in the file review process (52%) for professionalism issues. The majority of responses indicated that MSPRs were not fair for all MD students (60%) and required revision (74%) with greater emphasis required on transparency, professionalism, and narrative comments.

Discussion: The results indicate that though MSPRs are widely used in PG admissions their perceived value is limited to a few specific sources of information and to specific parts of the admissions process. There are significant concerns from PG stakeholders on the utility of MSPRs and future changes should align with the needs of these stakeholders while balancing the concerns of students and undergraduate programs.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-15

How to Cite

1.
Kulasegaram K, Hynes M, Bandiera G, Houston P. The current utility and future use of the medical student performance record: A survey of perceptions across Canada. Can. Med. Ed. J [Internet]. 2020 Jun. 15 [cited 2024 Dec. 25];11(3):e111-e115. Available from: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/69332

Most read articles by the same author(s)