Different Numbers, Different Stories: Problematizing "Gaps" in Ontario and the TDSB
Mots-clés :
Opportunity Gaps, Achievement Gaps, Equity, District, ReformRésumé
As an urban district reform for equity, the Model Schools for Inner Cities (MSIC) Program in the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) was founded as a response to inequities in the city and opportunity gaps among groups of students. This study critically explores the equity discourses among various stakeholders in the MSIC Program between 2004-14, with a specific focus on how opportunity gaps are conceptualized. Critical discourse analysis was used with attention to how these discourses interacted within and between two sets of sixteen participant interviews and the analysis of twelve documents, as well as how the discourses changed over time. A spectrum of thinking emerged from the data on opportunity gap discourses, with Affirmative Discourses on the one hand, and transformative discourses on the other and included four components. Three of the four components were adapted from the work of Fraser’s (2005) tripartite theory of justice (Redistribution, Recognition and Representation). The fourth component emerged from the data and will be referred to as Re-education.
Références
Anderson, G. (2001). Promoting educational equity in a period of growing social inequity: The silent contradictions of Texas reform discourse. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 320-332.
Apple, M. (2006). Understanding and interrupting neoliberalism and neo-conservatism in education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(1), 21-26.
Dwyer, S., & Buckle, J. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54-63.
EQAO. (2017). Summary of findings. Retrieved from https://eqaoweb.eqao.com/eqaoweborgprofile/profile.aspx?_Mident=73&Lang=E
Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review, 36, 39-88.
Fullan, M. (2012). What America can learn from Ontario success. The Atlantic. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/05/what-america-can-learn-from-ontarios-education-success/256654/
Ghosh, R., & Abdi, A. (2004). Education and the politics of difference: Select Canadian perspectives (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Gorski, P. (2008). Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education, 19(6), 515–525.
Inglis, T. (1997). Empowerment and emancipation. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 3-17.
Kincheloe, J. (1999). Critical democracy and education. In J. G. Henderson, & K. Kesson (Eds.), Understanding democratic curriculum leadership. New York, NY: Columbia University Teacher’s College Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
Maclure, M. (1994). Language and discourse: The embrace of uncertainty. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 283-300.
Mansfield, K. (2014). “Creating smooth spaces in striated places”: Toward a global theory for examining social justice leadership in schools. In I. Bogotch, & C. M. Shields (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and social (in) justice, Volume 1. Doredrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
McKell, L. (2010). Achievement Gap Task Force draft report for discussion and feedback. Toronto, ON: Toronto District School Board.
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Milner. R. (2012). But what is urban education? Urban Education, 47(3), 556-561.
MSIC. (2014). MSIC Deliverables. Unpublished internal document, Toronto District School Board.
Noguera, P. (2006). A critical response to Michael Fullan’s “The future of educational change: System thinkers in action.” Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 129-132.
Portelli, J., Shields, C., & Vibert, A. (2007). Toward an equitable education: Poverty, diversity and students at risk. Retrieved from http://utoronto.academia.edu/JohnPPortelli/Books/373536/Toward_an_Equitable_Education_Poverty_Diversity_and_Students_at_Risk
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, M. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London, New York: Routledge.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, M. (2009). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyers (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87-121). London, England: Sage.
Rorrer, A., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 307-358.
Ross, W., & Gibson, R. (2006). Neoliberalism and education reform. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
Ryan, J. (2010). The way in which leadership is conceived. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 4(4), 346-348.
Taylor, C. (1992). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition (pp. 25-74). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Toronto District School Board. (n.d.) Model schools for inner cities parent academy resource guide. Toronto, ON: Author.
Toronto District School Board. (2000). Equity foundations statement and commitments to equity policy. Toronto, ON: Author.
Toronto District School Board (2005). Model schools for inner cities task force report. Toronto, ON: Author.
Toronto District School Board. (2012a). Model schools for inner cities (MSIC) backgrounder. Toronto, ON: Author.
Toronto District School Board. (2012b). TDSB grade 9 cohort of 2006-2011: Graduation rate patterns fact sheet no. 2. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/research/docs/reports/Gr9CohortFactSheet2GraduationRatePatterns.pdf
Toronto District School Board. (2014a). Facts: 3 and 6 achievement outcomes. Retrieved from: http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/research/docs/reports/GR%203-6AchievementOutcomesFS-FINAL23May14.pdf
Toronto District School Board. (2014b). The 2014 learning opportunities index: Questions and answers. Toronto, ON: Author. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/0/AboutUs/Research/LOI2014.pdf
Toronto District School Board. (2014c). Inner city advisory committee backgrounder. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/0/ICAC_Backgrounder.pdf
Toronto District School Board. (2017). Expulsion decision-making process and expelled students’ transition experience in the Toronto District School Board’s caring and safe schools programs and their graduation rates. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/research/docs/reports/Student%20Expulsion%20Rpt%2030Mar17.pdf
Turner, E. (2015). Districts’ responses to demographic change: Making sense of race, class, and immigration in political and organizational context. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 4-39.
Valencia, R. (1997). Conceptualizing the notion of deficit thinking. In R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 1-12). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1, 17-27.
Zheng, S. (2009). Research report 2006 student census: Correlations of school experiences with student demographics and achievement. Toronto, ON: Toronto District School Board.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs dont les articles sont publiés dans la Revue acceptent les conditions suivantes :
-
Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la Revue un droit de première publication, les travaux faisant en même temps l’objet d’une licence d'attribution Creative Commons autorisant d’autres parties à diffuser les travaux, sous réserve d’une mention de l’auteur et de la publication initiale dans la RCAPE.
-
Il est permis aux auteurs de conclure des ententes contractuelles distinctes additionnelles en vue de la diffusion non exclusive de la version de travaux parus dans la Revue (p. ex. pour enregistrement dans un dépôt institutionnel ou inclusion dans un ouvrage), à la condition d’inclure une mention de la parution initiale dans la RCAPE.
-
Les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à faire paraître leurs travaux en ligne (p. ex. dans des dépôts institutionnels ou dans leurs sites Web) avant et pendant le processus d’évaluation, ce qui peut déboucher sur des échanges productifs et favoriser et faire que les travaux publiés soient cités plus tôt et plus fréquemment
