Incorporating Students as Partners in Educational Innovation: Development of an Elective Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.14.17Keywords:
Students as Partners, course design, CIMO-logicAbstract
Despite the growing involvement of pharmacy students as co-creators or Students as Partners (SaP), some faculty members remain hesitant to form these partnerships due to students’ limited pedagogical knowledge. To address this, we co-created a course that equips and enthuses students to engage meaningfully in educational innovation, using the principles of scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). In the course, student groups were paired with faculty members (assigners) seeking to enhance their teaching. Following the first five steps of the Utrecht Roadmap for SoTL (UR-SoTL) as a framework, students developed a theoretical understanding of educational innovation and its impact on learning. Supplementary workshops and lectures provided additional pedagogical knowledge and skills. This case study outlines the course design, the resulting project proposals, and the perception of participating students and faculty members. Qualitative feedback shows that students and faculty members found the course inspiring. Although many students had not previously considered contributing to educational projects, they reported feeling capable of making meaningful contributions after taking this course. Their proposals were evidence-informed and demonstrated alignment between proposed learning activities, underlying learning processes, and desired learning outcomes. Faculty participants expressed enthusiasm for the projects and planned to implement the proposed interventions. The course motivated both students and faculty members to participate in future collaborations. However, time constraints limited further student engagement in their projects after the course had ended. This case study highlights the benefits of using an elective course to facilitate student involvement in educational innovation and the challenges that may arise.
References
Abbott, Christine, and Paul Taylor. 2013. “Facilitating Action Learning.” In Action Learning in Social Work, edited by Christine Abbott and Paul Taylor. Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526401519.n9.
Biggs, John. 1996. “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.” Higher Education 32: 347–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871.
Bovill, Catherine, Alison Cook-Sather, Peter Felten, Luke Millard, and Niamh Moore-Cherry. 2016. “Addressing Potential Challenges in Co-Creating Learning and Teaching: Overcoming Resistance, Navigating Institutional Norms and Ensuring Inclusivity in Student-Staff Partnerships.” Higher Education 71 (2): 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4.
Cook-Sather, Alison, Catherine Bovill, and Peter Felten. 2014. Engaging Students as Partners in Teaching and Learning: A Guide for Faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Denyer, David, David Tranfield, and Joan Ernst van Aken. 2008. “Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis.” Organization Studies 29 (3): 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020.
Fanghanel, Joelle, Jacqueline Potter, Jane Pritchard, and Gina Wisker. 2016. “Promoting Excellence through Teaching Scholarship.” University of West London.
Felten, Peter. 2013. “Principles of Good Practice in SoTL.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1 (1): 121–25. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.121.
Gravett, Karen, Ian M. Kinchin, and Naomi E. Winstone. 2019. “‘More than Customers’: Conceptions of Students as Partners Held by Students, Staff, and Institutional Leaders.” Studies in Higher Education 45 (12): 2574–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769.
Haigh, Neil, and Andrew John Withell. 2020. “The Place of Research Paradigms in SoTL Practice: An Inquiry.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.3.
Healey, Mick, Abbi Flint, and Kathy Harrington. 2014. “Engagement through Partnership: Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.” Higher Education Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/engagement_through_partnership_1568036621.pdf.
Lubicz-Nawrocka, Tanya, and Catherine Bovill. 2021. “Do Students Experience Transformation through Co-Creating Curriculum in Higher Education?” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (7): 1744–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1928060.
Lyman, Frank. 1981. “The Responsive Classroom Discussion.” In Mainstreaming Digest, edited by Audrey Springs Anderson. University of Maryland College of Education.
Maas, Lieke, Veronia Nasralla, Marit van Riessen, Irma Meijerman, and Tamara Muliaditan. 2026. “Reflective Insights on Co-Creating an Elective Course as Students-as-Partners.”
MacMillan, Margy. 2018. “The SoTL literature review. Exploring New Territory.” In SoTL in Action. Illuminating Critical Moments of Practice, edited by Nancy L. Chick. Stylus Publishing.
Matthews, Kelly E. 2019. “Rethinking the Problem of Faculty Resistance to Engaging with Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 13 (2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130202.
Matthews, Kelly E., Alison Cook-Sather, and Mick Healey. 2018. “Connecting Learning, Teaching, and Research through Student-Staff Partnerships: Toward Universities as Egalitarian Learning Communities.” In Shaping Higher Education with Students: Ways to Connect Research and Teaching, edited by Vincent C. H. Tong, Alex Standen, and Mina Sotiriou. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21c4tcm.7.
Meijerman, Irma, Lindy Wijsman, and Femke Kirschner. 2024a. “Utrecht Roadmap for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (UR-SoTL).” Utrecht University—Centre for Academic Teaching and Learning. https://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/Utrecht%20Roadmap%20for%20SoTL_EN_2024.pdf.
Meijerman, Irma, Lindy Wijsman, and Femke Kirschner. 2024b. “Adding a Scholarly Analysis of Teaching and Learning to SoTL: The Development of the Hands-on Utrecht Roadmap for SoTL.” International Journal for Academic Development. 30 (4): 474–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2024.2361428.
Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy, Sam Lucie Dvorakova, Kelly E. Matthews, Sophia Abbot, Breagh Cheng, Peter Felten, Kris Knorr, Elizabeth Marquis, Rafaella Shammas, and Kelly Swaim. 2017. “A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119.
Muscanell, Nicole. 2024. “The Teaching and Learning Workforce in Higher Education.” Research report. EDUCAUSE. https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/2024/the-teaching-and-learning-workforce-in-higher-education-2024/introduction-and-key-findings.
Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2020. “Overview of Self-Determination Theory: An Organismic Dialectical Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-Determination Research, edited by Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. University of Rochester Press.
Stuart, Celeste, Martha Cassidy-Neumiller, and Kelsey Harvey. 2023. “Modalities of Faculty Engagement with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education 6 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v6i1.320.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tamara Muliaditan, Irma Meijerman, Anneke van Houwelingen, Igor Sweet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
