Engaging in SoTL through a Two-Year Program: Challenges, Success Factors, and Powerful Support Strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.14.16

Keywords:

program design, institutional support, faculty development

Abstract

How can universities create the right conditions for faculty to engage meaningfully in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)? While SoTL can enhance teaching quality, foster professional growth, and raise the profile of teaching, faculty often encounter several challenges when engaging in SoTL. This poster examines how institutions can create more favorable conditions for SoTL and identifies effective strategies for supporting faculty. It presents findings from a study of a two-year SoTL program at the University of Amsterdam. The program, co-funded by the university’s teaching and learning centre and participants’ departments, offers mentoring, interdisciplinary dialogue, and allocated time (one day per week) to participants conducting SoTL projects. To explore participants’ experiences, the research team conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 members of the first cohort. We then analyzed data thematically: we coded transcripts inductively iteratively refined those codes, and grouped patterns into overarching themes. Participants valued the combination of individual mentoring and peer exchange, yet many struggled to protect their allotted time and engage colleagues in their projects. Unfamiliarity with SoTL and its norms appeared to underlie several of the participants’ challenges, including uncertainty about expected outputs and impact. We argue that two support strategies are key: building collective understanding of SoTL’s purposes and quality standards, and involving stakeholders to embed SoTL within departments. These principles reinforce each other, enabling SoTL to take root institutionally. The poster further outlines the program design and lessons learned. Findings may be transferable to institutions seeking to strengthen SoTL engagement, helping them anticipate challenges and design powerful support structures.

Author Biography

  • S.L. (Svenne) Groeneweg, University of Amsterdam

    S.L. (Svenne) Groeneweg (Amsterdam) MSc is a PhD candidate at the University of Amsterdam studying the impact of SoTL, whilst working at the university’s teaching and learning centre. This combined position allows her to establish fruitful links between theory and practice, and make a valuable contribution to the field of SoTL.

References

Clarke, Victoria, and Virginia Braun. 2017. “Thematic Analysis.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 12 (3): 297–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613.

Cornejo-Happel, Claudia A., and Xiaomei Song. 2020. “Facilitators and Barriers to Engagement and Effective SoTL Research Collaborations in Faculty Learning Communities.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.5.

Dobbins, Kerry. 2011. “Personal Reflection: Reflections on SoTL by a Casual Lecturer: Personal Benefits, Long-Term Challenges.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050224.

Fanghanel, Joëlle, Jane Pritchard, Jacqueline Potter, and Gina Wisker. 2015. Literature Review. Defining and Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A Sector-wide Study. Higher Education Academy.

Gansemer-Topf, Ann M., Amarjargal Mendee, Yiqi Liang, Barbara Kensington-Miller, and Naifa Alqahtani. 2023. “SoTL Support at the ‘Best’ Undergraduate Teaching Institutions.” Innovative Higher Education 48: 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09657-6.

Hutchings, Pat, Mary Huber, and Anthony Ciccone. 2011. “Feature Essays: Getting There: An Integrative Vision of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050131.

Kim, Alice S. N., Celia Popovic, Laura Farrugia, Salma A. F. Saleh, Geneviève Maheux-Pelletier, and Mandy Frake-Mistak. 2021. “On Nurturing the Emergent SoTL Researcher: Responding to Challenges and Opportunities.” The International Journal for Academic Development 26 (2): 163–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1842743.

Myatt, Paula, Deanne Gannaway, Ivy Chia, Kym Fraser, and Jacquelin McDonald. 2018. “Reflecting on Institutional Support for SoTL Engagement: Developing a Conceptual Framework.” The International Journal for Academic Development 23 (2): 147–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1346511.

A research poster with text, diagrams, and a graphic of a tree in the middle.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24