Moving From “Good” to “Great” SoTL: The Importance of Describing Your Research Epistemological and Ontological Traditions in Your SoTL Scholarship

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.31

Keywords:

research lens, paradigm, epistemology and ontology, pluralism

Abstract

This paper explores the metaphor of the “Big Tent” in the context of the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), highlighting the metaphor’s limitations in capturing the complexities and tensions within the scholarly community. This paper delves into the conflicts arising from differing methodologies, epistemological stances, and disciplinary boundaries, viewing them as manifestations of intellectual vigor rather than weaknesses. The paper emphasizes the role of academic training in shaping our perceptions and biases towards educational research and underscores the need for acknowledging these biases in order to foster meaningful dialogue and bridge the diversity in SoTL. We revisit past research on the principles of good practice in SoTL and the shifted focus from “students” to “learners,” acknowledging faculty as perpetual learners in improving teaching practices. The paper proposes an additional principle to elevate SoTL from “good” to “great”: the explicit identification of our SoTL lens. This involves acknowledging our biases, disciplinary perspectives, and methodological preferences in order to enhance the transparency and richness of scholarly conversations. The paper concludes with a call to embrace self-awareness and invites others to do the same, aiming to refine our collective vision and make SoTL endeavors not just inclusive but truly transformative.

Author Biographies

Melanie Hamilton, University of Saskatchewan

Dr. Melanie Hamilton (CAN) is the director of the Centre for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the University of Saskatchewan. She is currently the president of ISSOTL and has held positions such as chair of SoTL Canada and member of the board of directors for the Society for Teaching and Learning (STLHE) in Canada.

Brett McCollum, Thompson Rivers University

Dr. Brett McCollum (CAN) is the director of the Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching at Thompson Rivers University, previously full professor of Chemistry, and current editor-in-chief of CJSOTL and has held positions such as chair of SoTL Canada and member of the board of directors for the Society for Teaching and Learning (STLHE) in Canada.

References

Adams, Douglas. 1979. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. London: Pan Books.

Ball, Paula. 2009. “Phenomenology in Nursing Research: Methodology, Interviewing and Transcribing.” Nursing Times 105 (32): 30–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.22.32.s38

Bhaskar, Roy. (1975) 2013. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732

Boyer, Ernest L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Boyer, Ernest L. 1987. The Undergraduate Experience. New York: Harper and Row.

Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Comte, Auguste. (1865) 2015. A General View of Positivism. Translated by J. H. Bridges. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645780

Connelly, Lynn M. 2010. “What is Phenomenology?” MedSurg Nursing 19 (2).

Felten, Peter. 2013. “Principles of Good Practice in SoTL.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1 (1): 121–25. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121

Glassick, Charles. E., Mary T. Huber, and Gene I. Maefoff. 1997. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Haigh, Neil, and Andrew John Withell. 2020. “The Place of Research Paradigms in SoTL Practice: An Inquiry.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2): 17–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.3

Hubball, Harry, and Anthony Clarke. 2010. “Diverse Methodological Approaches and Considerations for SoTL in Higher Education.” Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1 (1): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.2

Hutchings, Pat. 2000. Opening Lines: Approaches to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Larrain, Jorge. 1979. The Concept of Ideology. London: Hutchinson.

McCollum, B.M. 2023. “Making the Case for SoTL’s Methodological Pluralism: An Introduction to Issue 14.2.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.2.17115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.2.17115

Mill, John S. 1873. Auguste Comte and Positivism. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co.

Park, Yoon Soo, Lars Konge, and Anthony R. Artino. 2020. “The Positivism Paradigm of Research.” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 95 (5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

Planck, Max K. 1950. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. New York: Philosophical Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1932511

Potter, Michael K., and Raffoul, Jessica. 2023. “Engaged Alienation: SoTL, Inclusivity, and the Problem of Integrity.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2023.17102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2023.17102

Potter, Michael K., and Brad Wuetherick. 2015. “Who is Represented in the Teaching Commons? SoTL Through the Lenses of the Arts and Humanities.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.2.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.2.2

Ryan, Gemma. 2018. “Introduction to Positivism, Interpretivism, and Critical Theory” Nurse Researcher 25 (4). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1466.

Thomas, Paul. 2011. “A Teacher’s Guide to Change: Understanding, Navigating, and Leading the Process.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 5 (1).

Webb, Andrea S. 2019. “Navigating the Lows to Gain New Heights: Constraints to SOTL Engagement.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8173

Yan, Guo. 2018. “Introduction to Positivism, Interpretivism, and Critical Theory.” Nurse Researcher 25 (4). https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1466

Yeo, Michelle, and Janice Miller-Young. 2015. “The Effect of a Teaching Development Program on Early Career Teachers in Higher Education.” Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2). https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/tli/article/view/57431.

An Ai-generated image showing a lecture hall classroom through the lens of a magnifying glass

Downloads

Published

2024-11-25

How to Cite

Hamilton, Melanie, and Brett MCollum. 2024. “Moving From “Good” to ‘Great’ SoTL: The Importance of Describing Your Research Epistemological and Ontological Traditions in Your SoTL Scholarship”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 12 (November):1–15. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.31.