Information Architecture Strategies in the Classroom: How Do Increasingly Complex Digital Ecosystems in Higher Education Shape the Contours of Instructor-Student Communication?

Michael Lahey

doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.18

Authors

Michael Lahey Kennesaw State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-0130

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.18

Keywords:

digital, findability, information architecture, higher education, understandability

Abstract

The proliferation of digital software is an increasingly accepted part of everyday life in higher education in the United States. While this software affords some opportunities, it can create confusing experiences for students as well. In this paper, I ask how might increasingly complex digital ecosystems in higher education shape the contours of instructor-student communication. To answer this question, I conducted an exploratory case study in the form of an online survey (n=83) and subsequent interviews (n=18) with user experience (UX) design students at a large public university in the southeastern United States. The research showed that students felt confusion regarding digital software protocols in their classes, how protocols varied from class to class, an inability to remember when and how to communicate with instructors outside of class, unsureness about where to locate information, and a preference for messaging applications over email. Research results suggest that instructor-student communication in higher education can be productively viewed through the lens of information architecture. In doing so, I argue for the need for instructors to implement strong information architecture strategies that help make sense of information in increasingly complex academic ecosystems.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Michael Lahey, Kennesaw State University

Michael Lahey (USA) is a coordinator and associate professor of interactive design at Kennesaw State University. His research currently focuses on the perceived disconnect between design education and contemporary design practices.

References

Akrich, Madeline, and Bruno Latour. 1992. “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 259–64.

Aljawarneh, Shadi. 2020. “Reviewing and Exploring Innovative Ubiquitous Learning Tools in Higher Education.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education (32): 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0.

Anghel, Ella. 2023. “The Good, the Bad, and the Pandemic: An Intra-Group Approach to Exploring Students’ Experiences with Collaborative Learning During COVID-19.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry (11): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.13.

Ashour, Sanaa. 2020. “How Technology Has Shaped University Students’ Perceptions and Expectations Around Higher Education: An Exploratory Study of the United Arab Emirates.” Studies in Higher Education 45(12): 2513–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1617683.

Bawden, David, and Lyn Robinson. 2009. “The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies.” Journal of Information Science 35 (2): 180–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508095781.

Benyon, David. 2014. Spaces of Interaction, Places for Experience. Cham, CH: Springer Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02206-7.

Benyon, David, and Andrea Resmini. 2017. “User Experience in Cross-Channel Ecosystems” HCI ’17: Proceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference (38): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.38.

Buford, Sally, and Andrea Resmini. 2017. “Cross-Channel Information Architecture for a World Exposition.” International Journal of Information Management 37(6): 547–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.010.

Castañeda, Linda, and Neil Selwyn. 2018. “More Than Tools? Making Sense of the Ongoing Digitizations of Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15 (22): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y.

Chen, Chwen Jen and Chee Siong Teh. 2022. “Exploring Students’ Online Learning Interaction Behaviors and Experiences: A Case Study.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry (10): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.38.

Chin, Monica. 2021. “File Not found.” The Verge. Accessed April 21, 2023. https://www.theverge.com/22684730/students-file-folder-directory-structure-education-gen-z.

Crompton, Helen, Matthew Bernacki, and Jeffery A. Greene. 2020. “Psychological Foundations of Emerging Technologies for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” Current Opinion in Psychology 36: 101–05. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.011.

Davis, Jenny. 2020. How Artifacts Afford: The Power and Politics of Everyday Things. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Davis, Nathaniel. 2011. “Information Overload, Reloaded.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 37 (5): 45–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2011.1720370513.

Ebneyamini, Shiva, and Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Moghadam. 2018. “Toward Developing a Framework for Conducting Case Study Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods (17): 1–11.

Evans, Sandra K., Katy E. Pearce, Jessica Vitak, and Jeffery W. Treem. 2017. “Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (1): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180.

Hast, Michael. 2021. “Higher Education in Times of Covid-19: Giving Online Feedback Implementation Another Look.” Higher Education Studies 11 (1): 1–7. http://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n1p1.

Hinton, Andrew. 2015. Understanding Context: Environment, Language, and Information Architecture. Sebastopol, UA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Karapanos, Evangelos, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2009. “User Experience over Time: An Initial Framework.” CHI ’09 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2009 729–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518814.

Ladner, Sam. 2014. Practical Ethnography: A Guide to Doing Ethnography in the Private Sector. New York: Routledge.

Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, Lisa Maria. 2019. Everyday Information Architecture. New York: A Book Apart.

McVeigh-Schultz, Joshua and Nancy K. Baym. 2015. “Thinking of You: Vernacular Affordance in the Context of the Microsocial Relationship App, Couple.” Social Media + Society 1 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604649.

Morville, Peter. 2015. Ambient Findability. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Narayan, Bjuva and Michael Olsson. 2014. “Sense-Making Across Space and Time: Implications for the Organization and Findability of Information.” Proceedings for the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50 (1): 1–9.http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001071.

Norman, Don. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.

Papaneck, Victor. 2005. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Second Edition. Chicago: Chicago Review Press.

Park, Sung Youl, Min-Woo Nam, and Seung-Bong Cha. 2012. “University Students” Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: Evaluating the Technology Acceptance Model.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (4): 592–605. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x.

Pokhrel, Sumitra, and Roshan Chhetri. 2021. “A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education for the Future 8 (1): 133–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481.

Powerschool. 2023. “The Impact of Too Many School Technology Tools.” Powerschool. Accessed April 24, 2023. https://www.powerschool.com/infographic/school-technology-tools.

Resmini, Andrea. 2014. “Preface.” In Reframing Information Architecture, edited by Andrea Resmini. New York: Springer, v – vi.

Resmini, Andrea, and Bertil Lindenfalk. 2021. “Mapping Experience Ecosystems as Emergent Actor-Created Spaces.” In Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XLVII: Special Issue on Digital Ecosystems and Social Networks, edited by Abdelkader Hameurlain, A Min Tjoa, Richard Chbeir. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 1–28.

Resmini, Andrea and Flávia Lacerda. 2016. “The Architecture of Cross-Channel Ecosystems: from Convergence to Experience.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems (MEDES). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012071.3012087.

Resmini, Andrea and Luca Rosati. 2011. “A Brief History of Information Architecture.” Journal of Information Architecture 3 (2): 33–46. http://doi.org/10.55135/1015060901/112.006/3.024.

Robles Anderson, Erica, and Scott Ferguson. 2022. “The Visual Cliff: Eleanor Gibson & the Origins of Affordances.” Money on the Left. Accessed November 12, 2023. https://moneyontheleft.org/2022/04/19/the-visual-cliff-eleanor-gibson-the-origins-of-affordance/.

Rodríguez-Moreno, Javier, Ana María Ortiz-Colón, Eulogio Cordón-Pozo, and Miriam Agreda-Montoro. 2021. “The Influence of Digital Tools and Social Networks on the Digital Competence of University Students during COVID-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (6): 2835, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062835.

Rosati, Luca, Antonella Schena, and Rita Massacesi. 2014. “Cross-channel Design for Cultural Institutions—The Istituto degli Innocenti in Florence.” In Reframing Information Architecture, edited by Andrea Resmini. New York: Springer. 145–56.

Rosenfeld, Louis, Peter Morville, and Jorge Arango. 2015. Information Architecture: From the Web and Beyond, 4th Edition. Sebastapol, UA: O’Reilly Media.

Saldaña, Johnny. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.

Scanlon, Eileen, Patrick McAndrew, Tim O’Shea. 2015. “Designing for Educational Technology to Enhance the Experience of Learners in Distance Education: How Open Educational Resources, Learning Design and Moocs Are Influencing Learning.” Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1 (6): 1–9. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.al.

Selwyn, Neil. 2014. Digital Technology and the Contemporary University: Degrees of Digitization. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Shell, Alison, Medha Tare, and Eunice Blemahdoo. 2020. “Incorporating Research and Educator Voice in Edtech Design.” The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (3): 1573–576.

Stake, Robert. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sweeney, Trudy, Deborah West, Anthea Groessler, Aeron Haynie, Bettie Higgs, Janet Macaulay, Lucy Mercer-Mapstone and Michelle Yeo. 2017. “Where’s the Transformation? Unlocking the Potential of Technology-enhanced Assessment.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 5 (1): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.5.

Turnbull, Darren, Ritseh Chugh, and Jo Luck. 2021. “Transitioning to E‑Learning during the COVID‑19 Pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions Responded to the Challenge?” Education and Information Technologies 26: 6401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w.

Velasco, Jessica. 2022. “Finding the Right Size College: Small, Medium or Large Campus?” CollegeRaptor. Accessed November 11, 2023. https://www.collegeraptor.com/find-colleges/articles/college-search/finding-the-right-size-college-small-medium-or-large/.

Virtanen, Mari Aulikki, Elina Haavisto, Eeva Liikanen, and Maria Kääriäinen. 2017. “Education and Information Technologies: Ubiquitous Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Literature Review.” Education and Information Technologies 23 (1): 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9646-6.

Yin, Robert K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Sixth Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Young, Indi. 2022. Time to Listen: How Giving People Space to Speak Drives Invention and Inclusion. San Francisco: Indi Young Books.