Defining Active Learning: A Restricted Systematic Review
Keywords:active learning, engagement, student centered, higher education, systematic review
What is active learning? While active learning has been demonstrated to have positive impacts on student learning and performance, defining the concept has been elusive. Previous research examining active learning definitions in STEM fields found that the vast majority of published articles did not define active learning, and those that did defined active learning as interacting, engaging, or not lecturing. The current research extends this STEM-focused work by examining both social science and STEM science publications. A restricted systematic review of literature was conducted using the SCOPUS database, resulting in 547 relevant articles focused on active learning from 2017 to 2022. An examination of the articles indicated that 71% of the reviewed articles did not define active learning and that the instructional strategies most often cited as fostering active learning emphasized social interactive learning strategies (e.g., small groups, team-based learning, discussion, and cooperative learning), as well as critical thinking strategies (e.g., problem-based learning, case-based learning, and inquiry-based learning). In addition, an in-depth qualitative analysis of the 161 definitions provided within the articles yielded three main emergent themes: (a) active learning is defined as grounded in student-centered constructivist theory, (b) active learning is defined as promoting higher-order thinking and deep learning, and (c) active learning is defined as an instructional strategy involving activity, participation, and engagement. Given these main findings, a representative definition was created: Active learning is a student-centered approach to the construction of knowledge focused on activities and strategies that foster higher-order thinking.
Click here to read the corresponding ISSOTL blog post.
Abu Bakar, Mohamad Ariffin, and Norulhuda Ismail. 2020. “Mathematical Instructional: A Conceptual of Redesign of Active Learning with Metacognitive Regulation Strategy.” International Journal of Instruction 13 (3): 633–48. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13343a.
Alonso-Nuez, Maria, Ana I. Gil-Lacruz, and Jorge Rosell-Martinez. 2021. “Assessing Evaluation: Why Student Engages or Resists to Active Learning?” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 31: 1001–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09582-1.
Anakin, Megan, and Arlene McDowell. 2021. “Enhancing Students’ Experimental Knowledge with Active Learning in a Pharmaceutical Science Laboratory.” Pharmacy Education 21: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2021.211.2938.
Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl, Peter W. Airasian, Kathleen A. Cruikshank, Richard E. Mayer, Paul R. Pintrich, James Raths, and Merlin C. Wittrock. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Aranha, Elzo Alves, Paulo Henrique dos Santos, and Neuza Abbud Prado Garcia. 2018. “EDLE: An Integrated Tool to Foster Entrepreneurial Skills Development in Engineering Education.” Educational Technology Research and Development 66 (6): 1571–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9624-8.
Barrett, Martin, Chad Hershock, Michael McCarthy, Michael Melville, and Joe Mertz. 2021. “What Type of Debrief Is Best for Learning during Think-Pair-Shares?” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9 (1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.5.
Basheer, Asmaa Al, and Saja Almazrou. 2021. “Assessing Female Pharmacy Students’ Satisfaction with Active Learning Techniques at King Saud University.” Advances in Medical Education and Practice 12: 319–27. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s284415.
Bernstein, Douglas A. 2018. “Does Active Learning Work? A Good Question, But Not the Right One.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 4 (4): 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000124.
Bertsch, Sharon, Bryan J. Pesta, Richard Wiscott, and Michael A. McDaniel. 2007. “The Generation Effect: A Meta Analytic View.” Memory & Cognition 35 (2): 201–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193441.
Biggs, John, and Catherine Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.
Bonwell, Charles C., and James A. Eison. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Washington DC: The George Washington University.
Buitrago-Florez, Francisco, Juan C. Reyes, Raul Rincon, Carola Hernandez, Francisco A. Galvis, and Christian Angel. 2020. “Engaging in Homework Development: TARSIS Platform as an Innovative Learning Methodology.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 36 (3): 147–62. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5865.
Calderon, Antonio, Lourdes Merono, and Ann MacPhail. 2020. “A Student-Centered Digital Technology Approach: The Relationship between Intrinsic Motivation, Learning Climate and Academic Achievement of Physical Education Pre-Service Teachers.” European Physical Education Review 26 (1): 241–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x19850852.
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
Cheng, Li, Albert D. Ritzhaupt, and Pavlo Antonenko. 2019. “Effects of the Flipped Classroom Instructional Strategy on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Technology Research and Development 67 (4): 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7.
Chi, Michelene T. H., and Ruth Wylie. 2014. “The ICAP framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.” Educational Psychologist 49: 219–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.
Cho, Hyun Jin, Michael R. Melloch, and Chantal Levesque-Bristol. 2021. “Enhanced Student Perceptions of Learning and Performance Using Concept-Point-Recovery Teaching Sessions: A Mixed-Method Approach.” International Journal of STEM Education 8 (1): 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00276-1.
Clark, Charlotte Emily Jane, and Ger Post. 2021. “Preparation and Synchronous Participation Improve Student Performance in a Blended Learning Experience.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 37 (3): 187–99. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6811.
Clarkson, Georgia. 2018. “Evaluating the Potential of IPads to Actively Engage Paramedicine Students in an Authentic Learning Experience.” Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.15.1.548.
Creswell, John. 2013. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.
Deslauriers, Louis, Logan S. McCarty, Kelly Miller, Kristina Callaghan, and Greg Kestin. 2019. “Measuring Actual Learning versus Feeling of Learning in Response to Being Actively Engaged in the Classroom.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (39): 19251–57. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116.
Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
Dewsbury, Bryan M., Holly J. Swanson, Serena Moseman-Valtierra, and Joshua Caulkins. 2022. “Inclusive and Active Pedagogies Reduce Academic Outcome Gaps and Improve Long Term Performance.” PLoS ONE 17 (6): e0268620. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268620.
Dobbins, Maureen. 2017. Rapid Review Guidebook: Steps for Conducting a Rapid Review. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools.
Driessen, Emily P., Jennifer K. Knight, Michelle K. Smith, and Cissy J. Ballen. 2020. “Demystifying the Meaning of Active Learning in Postsecondary Biology Education.” CBE Life Sciences Education 19 (4): ar52. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-04-0068.
Entwistle, Noel, and Paul Ramsden. 1983. Understanding Student Learning. New York: Routledge.
Felder, Richard M., and Rebecca Brent. 2009. “Active Learning: An Introduction.” ASQ Higher Education Brief 2 (4): 1–5.
Fixen, Megan, and Nicole Wald. 2021. “Obstacles Overcome: A Universal Guide to Active Learning.” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice 21 (4): 106–10. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i4.4212.
Fragapane, Lauren, Wei Li, Bertha Ben Khallouq, Zixi J. Cheng, and David M. Harris. 2018. “Comparison of Knowledge Retention between High-Fidelity Patient Simulation and Read-Only Participants in Undergraduate Biomedical Science Education.” Advanced Physiology Education 42: 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2018.
Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Graffam, Ben. 2009. “Active Learning in Medical Education: Strategies for Beginning Implementation.” Medical Teacher 29 (1): 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590601176398.
Hake, Richard R. 1998. “Interactive-Engagement vs Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66: 64–74.
Hamel, Candyce, Alan Michaud, Micere Thuku, Becky Skidmore, Adrienne Stevens, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, and Chantelle Garritty. 2021. “Defining Rapid Reviews: A Systematic Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis of Definitions and Defining Characteristics of Rapid Reviews.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 129: 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041.
Hartikainen, Susanna, Heta Rintala, Laura Pylvas, and Petri Nokelainen. 2019. “The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education.” Education Sciences 9 (4): 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276.
Hayton, John William. 2017. “Helping Them to Help Themselves? An Evaluation of Student-Led Tutorials in a Higher Education Setting.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 43 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2017.1349892.
Hernandez-de-Menendez, Marcela, Antonio Vallejo Guevara, Juan Carlos Tudon Martinez, Diana Hernandez Alcantara, and Ruben Morales-Menendez. 2019. “Active Learning in Engineering Education. A Review of Fundamentals, Best Practices and Experiences.” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 13 (3): 909–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8.
Holec, Victoria, and Richelle Marynowski. 2020. “Does It Matter Where You Teach? Insights from a Quasi-Experimental Study on Student Engagement in an Active Learning Classroom.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2): 140–64. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.10.
Hopper, Mari, and Daniela Brake. 2018. “Student Engagement and Higher Order Skill Proficiency: A Comparison of Traditional Didactic and Renewed Integrated Active Learning Curricula.” Advanced Physiological Education (43): 685–92. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00149.2018.
Judge, Andrew. 2021. “Designing and Implementing Policy Writing Assessments: A Practical
Guide.” Teaching Public Administration 39 (3): 351–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420961442.
Kapur, Manu, John Hattie, Irina Grossman, and Tanmay Sinha. 2022. “Fail, Flip, Fix, and Feed - Rethinking Flipped Learning: A Review of Meta-Analyses and a Subsequent Meta-Analysis.” Frontiers in Education 7: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.956416.
Kiger, Michelle, and Lara Varoio. 2020. “Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data: AMEE Guide No. 131.” Medical Teacher 42: 846–54.
Konopka, Clóvis Luis, Martha Bohrer Adaime, and Pedro Henrique. Mosele. 2015. “Active Teaching and Learning Methodologies: Some Considerations.” Creative Education 6 (14): 1536–45. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.614154.
Kuismaa, Merja, and Petri Nokelainena. 2018. “Effects of Progressive Inquiry on Cognitive and Affective Learning Outcomes in Adolescents’ Geography Education.” Frontline Learning Research 6 (2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i2.
Kurtz, Josh B., Michael A. Lourie, Elizabeth E. Holman, Karri L. Grob, and Seetha U. Monrad. 2019. “Creating Assessments as an Active Learning Strategy: What are Students’ Perceptions? A Mixed Methods Study.” Medical Education Online 24 (1): 1630239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1630239.
Kutergina, Evgeniia. 2017. “Computer-Based Simulation Games in Public Administration Education.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 10 (2): 119–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2017-0014.
Lea, Susan, David Stephenson, and Juliette Troy. 2003. “Higher Education Students’ Attitudes to Student Centered Learning: Beyond ‘Educational Bulimia.’” Studies in Higher Education 28 (3): 321–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309293.
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina. 2012. Enhancing Politics Teaching through Active Learning. In: Cathy Gromley Heenan and Simon Lightfoot (editors). Teaching Politics and International Relations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 51–64.
Limaymanta, Cesar H., Ludgarda Apaza-Tapia, Elizabeth Vidal, and Orlando Gregorio-Chaviano. 2021. “Flipped Classroom in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis and Proposal of a Framework for Its Implementation.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 16 (9): 133–49. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.21267.
Ljungman, Anders G., and Charlotte Silen. 2008. “Examination Involving Students as Peer Examiners.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (3): 289–300. https://doi.org/101080/02602930701293306.
Lombardi, Doug, Thomas F. Shipley, Astronomy Team, Biology Team, Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, et al. 2021. “The Curious Construct of Active Learning.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 22 (1): 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974.
Lopez-Caudana, Edgar, Maria Soledad Ramirez-Montoya, Sandra Martinez-Perez, and Guillermo Rodriguez-Abitia. 2020. “Using Robotics to Enhance Active Learning in Mathematics: A Multi-Scenario Study.” Mathematics 8 (12): 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122163.
Martella, Amedee Marchand, David Klahr, and Weiling Li. 2020. “The Relative Effectiveness of Different Active Learning Implementations in Teaching Elementary School Students How to Design Simple Experiments.” Journal of Educational Psychology 112 (8): 1582–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000449.
Martin, Andrew. 2018. “A Quantitative Framework for the Analysis of Two-Stage Exams.” International Journal of Higher Education 7 (4): 33. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n4p33.
Marton, Ference, and Roger Saljo. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I—Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.
McKinney, Kathleen. 2010. Enhancing Learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The Challenges and Joys of Juggling. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Metz, Cynthia J., and Michael J. Metz. 2022. “The Benefits of Incorporating Active Learning into Online, Asynchronous Coursework in Dental Physiology.” Advances in Physiology Education 46 (1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00110.2021.
Michael, Joel. 2006. “Where’s the Evidence That Active Learning Works?” Advances in Physiology Education 30 (4): 159–67. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006.
Mshayisa, Vusi Vincent. 2020. “Students’ Perceptions of Plickers and Crossword Puzzles in Undergraduate Studies.” Journal of Food Science Education 19 (2): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12179.
Ng, Oi-Lam, Fridolin Ting, Wai Hung Lam, and Minnie Liu. 2020. “Active Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Tutorials Via Cooperative Problem-Based Learning and Peer Assessment with Interactive Online Whiteboards.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 29 (3): 285–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00481-1.
Nguyen, Kevin A., Maura Borrego, Cynthia J. Finelli, Matt DeMonbrun, Caroline Crockett, Sneha Tharayil, Prateek Shekhar, Cynthia Waters, and Robyn Rosenberg. 2021. “Instructor Strategies to Aid Implementation of Active Learning: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of STEM Education 8 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7.
Okayama, Sakiko. 2019. “Student-Led Environmental Management System in Chiba University.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 20 (8): 1358–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-11-2018-0209.
Page, Matthew, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamsee, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ 372: 109. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Pantiwati, Yuni, and Husamah Husamah. 2017. “Self and Peer Assessments in Active Learning Model to Increase Metacognitive Awareness and Cognitive Abilities.” International Journal of Instruction 10 (4): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10411a.
Payán, Denise D. 2021. “Cultivating Health Policy Analysis and Communication Skills in Undergraduate Public Health Education: An Active Learning Approach.” Pedagogy in Health Promotion: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 7 (3): 235–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799211003248.
Piaget, Jean. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge.
Pluddemann, Annette, Jeffrey K. Aronson, Igho Onakpoya, Carl Heneghan, and Kamal Mahtani. 2018. “Redefining Rapid Reviews: A Flexible Framework for Restricted Systematic Reviews.” BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 23: 201–03. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111025.
Prince, Michael. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (3): 223–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
Prosser, Michael, and Keith Trigwell. 1999. Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Reitmeier, Chuck. 2010. “Active Learning in the Experimental Study of Food.” Journal of Food Science Education 1 (3): 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2002.tb00012.x.
Rethlefsen, Melissa, Shona Kirtley, Siw Waffenschmidt, Ana Ayala, David Moher, Matthew Page, and Jonathan Koffel. 2021. “PRISMA-S: An Extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.” Systematic Reviews 10 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
Roberts, David. 2018. “Active Learning Precursors in Multidisciplinary Large Lectures: A Longitudinal Trial on the Effect of Imagery in Higher Education Lectures.” Retrieved November 28, 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/33436.
Sajidin, Sajidin, and Ashadi Ashadi. 2021. “How Do Their ‘Group Work’ Works as an Active Learning Strategy of EFL Learning.” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan 40 (2): 480–94. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.36234.
Sheth, Monica, Naziya Samreen, Irina Rapoport, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Alice Fornari, and Petra Lewis. 2020. “Harnessing the Power of Low-Tech Collaborative Learning.” Journal of Breast Imaging 2 (6): 609–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaa054.
Shinaberger, Lee. 2017. “Components of a Flipped Classroom Influencing Student Success in an Undergraduate Business Statistics Class.” Journal of Statistics Education 25 (3): 22–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2017.1381056.
Sletten, Sarah Rae. 2017. “Investigating Flipped Learning: Student Self-Regulated Learning, Perceptions, and Achievement in an Introductory Biology Course.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 26 (3): 347–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9683-8.
Strauss, Anslem, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage.
Sugeng, Bambang, and Ani Wilujeng Suryani. 2018. “Presentation-Based Learning and Peer Evaluation to Enhance Active Learning and Self-Confidence in the Financial Management Classroom.” Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction 15 (1): 173–99. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.7.
Tayce, Jordan D., Ashley B. Saunders, Lisa Keefe, Jodi Korich. 2021. “The Creation of a Collaborative, Case-Based Learning Experience in a Large-Enrollment Classroom.” Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 48(1): 14¬–20. https://doi.org/10.3138kb,r.2019-0001.
Theobald, Elli J., Mariah J. Hill, Elisa Tran, Sweta Agrawal, E. Nicole Arroyo, Shawn Behling, Nyasha Chambwe, et al. 2020. “Active Learning Narrows Achievement Gaps for Underrepresented Students in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (12): 6476–83. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117.
Ting, Fridolin Sze Thou, Wai Hung Lam, and Ronnie Homi Shroff. 2019. “Active Learning via Problem-Based Collaborative Games in a Large Mathematics University Course in Hong Kong.” Education Sciences 9 (3): 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030172.
Torres, Manuel F., Armando J. Sousa, and Raquel T. Torres. 2018. “Pedagogical and Technological Replanning: A Successful Case Study on Integration and Transversal Skills for Engineering Freshmen.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28 (2): 573–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9399-y.
Treagust, David F., Sheila S. Qureshi, Venkat Rao Vishnumolakala, Joseph Ojeil, Mauro Mocerino, and Daniel C. Southam. 2020. “Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) as a Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: A Perspective from Grade 10 Chemistry Classes.” Research in Science Education 50 (3): 813–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9712-0.
Van Alten, David, Chris Phielix, Jeroen Janssen, and Liesbeth Kester. 2019. “Effects of Flipping the Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research Review 28: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003.
Versteeg, Marjolein, Floris van Blankenstein, Hein Putter, and Paul Steendijk. 2019. “Peer Instruction Improves Comprehension and Transfer of Physiological Concepts: A Randomized Comparison with Self-Explanation.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 24 (1): 151–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9858-6.
Von Glasersfeld, Ernst. 1989. “Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching.” Synthese 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869951.
Vygotsky, Lev. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Yu, Christine I., and Polly R. Husmann. 2021. “Construction of Knowledge Through Doing: A Brachial Plexus Model from Pipe Cleaners.” Medical Science Educator 31 (3): 1053-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01274-2.
Zain, Farah Mohamad, and Siti Nazuar Sailin. 2020. “Students’ Experience with Flipped Learning Approach in Higher Education.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 8 (10): 4946–58. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081067.
Zoller, Jonathan K., Jianghua He, Angela T. Ballew, Walter N. Orr, and Brigid C. Flynn. 2017. “Novel Use of a Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitor in a Personalized, Active Learning Simulation.” Advances in Physiology Education 41 (2): 266–69. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00185.2016.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Doolittle, Krista Wojdak, Amanda Walters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.