Reviewing the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective
Part 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.5Keywords:
SoTL literature reviews, academic literacies, embedded versus freestanding reviews, narrative versus systematic reviews, lived experience of undertaking literature searches and reviewsAbstract
There are few sources that critically evaluate the ways of reviewing the literature on scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). We use an academic literacies perspective as a lens with which to explore the ways that literature reviews may be undertaken. While reviewing the literature is often presented as a scientific, objective process, the reality is much messier, nuanced, and iterative. It is a complex, context-dependent procedure. We provide a practical, critical guide to undertaking SoTL literature reviews.
We distinguish between embedded reviews that present a review contextualising the research that follows, as in most SoTL articles; and freestanding reviews that synthesise research on specific topics. We discuss the nature of embedded reviews, and evaluate systematic and narrative review approaches to undertaking freestanding reviews. We contend that the claims of the superiority of systematic reviews are unjustified. It is important that contextually-sensitive judgements and interpretation of texts associated with narrative reviews are seen as central to the reviewing process, and as a strength rather than a weakness.
This article complements a separate one, where we apply an academic literacies lens to reviewing the literature on searching the SoTL literature. Together, they present a narrative review of searching and reviewing the SoTL literature undertaken systematically. We call for studies investigating the lived experiences of SoTL scholars. We illustrate this argument with an auto-ethnographic account of the often-serendipitous nature of our hunt for sources in preparing this review and the way our thinking and writing evolved during the writing of the two articles.
Click here to read the corresponding ISSOTL blog post.
References
Amundsen, Cheryl, and Wilson, Mary. 2012. “Are We Asking the Right Questions?: A Conceptual Review of the Educational Development Literature in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research 82 (1): 90–126. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654312438409.
Bell, Judith, and Stephen Waters. 2018. Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education and Social Science. 7th Edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Boell, Sebastian K., and Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic. 2014. “A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34: 257–86. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412.
Boell, Sebastian K., and Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic. 2015. “On Being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (2): 161–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26.
Booth, Andrew, Anthea Sutton, and Diana Papaioannou. 2016. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. 2nd Edition. London: Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrew-Booth-2/publication/235930866_Systematic_Approaches_to_a_Successful_Literature_Review/links/5da06c7f45851553ff8705fa/Systematic-Approaches-to-a-Successful-Literature-Review.pdf?origin=publication_detail.
Booth, Shirley, and Lorenzo C. Woollacott. 2018. “On the Constitution of SoTL: Its Domains and Contexts.” Higher Education 75 (3): 537–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0156-7.
Byrne, Jennifer A. 2016. “Improving the Peer Review of Narrative Literature Reviews.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (12): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0019-2.
Cappello, Alicia, and Janice Miller-Young. 2020. “Who Are We Citing and How? A SoTL Citation Analysis.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.2.
Case, Jennifer M. 2015. “Knowledge for Teaching, Knowledge about Teaching: Exploring the Links Between Educational Research, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and Scholarly Teaching.” Journal of Education 61: 53–72. http://joe.ukzn.ac.za/Libraries/No_61_2015/Joe_61_case.sflb.ashx.
Chick, Nancy L. 2016. The SoTL Lit Review, The SoTL Librarian. Last modified January 24, 2016. https://nancychick.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/the-sotl-lit-review-the-sotl-librarian/.
Chick, Nancy L., La Vonne Cornell-Swanson, Katina Lazarides, and Renee Meyers. 2014. “Reconciling Apples & Oranges: A Constructivist SoTL Writing Program.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 8 (2): Article 13. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol8/iss2/.
Chick, Nancy, Lorelli Nowell, and Bartlomiej Lenart. 2019. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Scoping Review Protocol.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry 7 (2): 186–97. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.12.
Coleman, Lynne, and Amanda Morris. 2021. ‘“You Become Academic Royalty Once You’ve Published’: A Social Practice Exploration of Identity in Academic Writing.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South 5 (2): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v5i2.192.
Cooper, Harris. 1998. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Daniel, Ben Kei, and Tony Harland. 2018. Higher Education Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide to the Research Process. Abingdon: Routledge.
Dewar, Jacqueline M., and Curtis D. Bennett. 2015. “Initiating a SoTL Investigation.” In Doing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Mathematics, edited by Jacqueline M. Dewar, and Curtis D. Bennett, 13–18. Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
Fanghanel, Joëlle, Suzannah McGowan, Pam Parker, Catherine McConnell, Jacqueline Potter, William Locke, and Mick Healey. 2015. Literature Review. Defining and Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A Sector-Wide Study. York: HE Academy. https://www.academia.edu/19942913/Defining_and_Supporting_the_Scholarship_of_Teaching_and_Learning_A_literature_review.
Ferrari, Rossella. 2015. “Writing Narrative Style Literature Reviews.” Medical Writing 24 (4): 230–35. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329.
Fink, Arlene. 2020. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 5th Edition. London: Sage.
Fister, Barbara. 2015. “The Social Life of Knowledge: Faculty Epistemologies.” In Not Just Where to Click: Teaching Students to Think About Information, edited by Troy A. Swanson, and Heather Jagman, 87–104. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries. https://barbarafister.net/SocialLife.pdf.
Geertsema, Johan. 2016. “Academic Development, SoTL and Educational Research.” International Journal for Academic Development 21 (2): 122–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1175144.
Gough, David, Sandy Oliver, and James Thomas. 2013. Learning from Research: Systematic Reviews for Informing Policy Decisions: A Quick Guide. London: The Alliance for Useful Evidence. https://patthomson.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/alliance-fue-reviews-booklet-3.pdf.
Gough, David, Sandy Oliver, and James Thomas. 2017. “Introducing Systematic Reviews.” In An Introduction to Systematic Reviews, edited by David Gough, Sandy Oliver, and James Thomas, 1–17. London: Sage.
Gough, David, and James Thomas. 2016. “Systematic Reviews of Research in Education: Aims, Myths and Multiple Methods.” Review of Education 4 (1): 103–05. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3068.
Green, Bart N., Claire D. Johnson, and Alan Adams. 2006. “Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 5 (3): 101–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6.
Greenhalgh Trisha, Sally Thorne, and Kirsty Malterud. 2018. “Time to Challenge the Spurious Hierarchy of Systematic over Narrative Reviews?” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 48 (6): e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931.
Halpern, David. 2013. “Preface.” In Learning from Research: Systematic Reviews for Informing Policy Decisions: A Quick Guide. By David Gough, Sandy Oliver, and James Thomas, 4. London: The Alliance for Useful Evidence. https://patthomson.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/alliance-fue-reviews-booklet-3.pdf.
Hammersley, Martyn. 2001. “On ‘Systematic’ Reviews of Research Literatures: A ‘Narrative’ Response to Evans & Benefield.” British Educational Research Journal 27 (5): 543–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095726.
Hart, Chris. 1998/2018. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. 1st/2nd Edition. London: SAGE.
Healey, Mick, Abbi Flint, and Katherine Harrington. 2014. Engagement Through Partnership: Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. York: HE Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher.
Healey, Mick, and Ruth L. Healey. 2019. Student Engagement Through Partnership: A Guide and Update to Advance HE Framework (04). York: Advance HE. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-ia0s5_CDQQeIHkZUrNGtp7g-BT_UEi3/view?usp=sharing.
Healey, Mick, and Ruth L. Healey. 2023. “Searching the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective Part 1.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 11.
Healey, Mick, Laura Lannin, Arran Stibbe, and James Derounian. 2013. Developing and Enhancing Undergraduate Final Year Projects and Dissertations. York: HE Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-and-enhancing-undergraduate-final-year-projects-and-dissertations.
Healey, Mick, Kelly E. Matthews, and Alison Cook-Sather. 2019. “Writing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Articles for Peer-reviewed Journals.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 7 (2): 28–50. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.3.
Healey, Mick, Kelly E. Matthews, and Alison Cook-Sather. 2020. Writing about Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Creating and Contributing to Scholarly Conversations across a Range of Genres. Elon: Center for Engaged Learning Open-Access Books. https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/books/writing-about-learning/.
Healey, Ruth L., Tina Bass, Jay Caulfield, Adam Hoffman, Michelle K. McGinn, Janice Miller-Young, and Martin Haigh. 2013. “Being Ethically Minded: Practising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in an Ethical Manner.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1 (2): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.23.
Healey, Ruth L., and Mick Healey. 2023. “Identifying and Reviewing the Key Literature for your Assignment.” In Key Methods in Geography, 4th Edition, edited by Nicholas J. Clifford, Meghan Cope, and Thomas Gillespie. London: SAGE.
Imel, Susan. 2011. “Writing a Literature Review.” In The Handbook of Scholarly Writing and Publishing, edited by Tonette S. Rocco and Timothy Gary Hatcher, 145–60. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jahan, Nusrat, Sasiq Naveed, Muhammad Zeshan, and Muhammad A. Tahir. 2016. “How to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review.” Cureus 8 (11): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.864.
Jensen, Julie Borup, Oline Pedersen, Ole Lund, and Helle Marie Skovbjerg. 2021. “Playful Approaches to Learning as a Realm for the Humanities in the Culture of Higher Education: A Hermeneutical Literature Review.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 21 (2): 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222211050862.
Jesson, Jill, Lydia Matheson, and Fiona M. Lacey. 2011. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. London: Sage.
Juntunen, Mari, and Mirjam Lehenkari. 2021. “A Narrative Literature Review Process for an Academic Business Research Thesis.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (2): 330–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1630813.
Kamler, Barbara, and Pat Thomson. 2014. Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for Supervision. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Kennedy, Mary M. 2007. “Defining a Literature.” Educational Researcher 36 (3): 139–47. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07299197.
Lather, Patti. 1999. “To Be of Use: The Work of Reviewing.” Review of Educational Research 69 (1): 2–7. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001002.
Larsson, Maria, Katarina Mårtensson, Linda Price, and Torgny Roxå. 2017. “Constructive Friction? Exploring Patterns between Educational Research and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” The 2nd EuroSoTL Conference, June 8–9, 2017, Lund, Sweden. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316860423.
Lea, Mary R. 2017. “Academic Literacies in Theory and Practice.” In Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopaedia of Language and Education, edited by Barry V. Street, and Stephen May, 127–58. 3rd Edition. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_19.
Lea, Mary R., and Barry Stierer. 2009. “Lecturers’ Everyday Writing as Professional Practice in the University as Workplace: New Insights into Academic Identities.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (4): 417–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771952.
Lea, Mary R., and Barry Stierer. 2011. “Changing Academic Identities in Changing Academic Workplaces: Learning from Academics’ Everyday Professional Writing Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (6): 605–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560380.
Leijon, Marie, Petri Gudmundsson, Patricia Staaf, and Cecilia Christersson. 2021. “Challenge Based Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59 (5): 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503.
Li, Yepping, Ke Wang, Yu Xao, and Jeffrey E. Froyd. 2020. “Research and Trends in STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Journal Publications.” International Journal of STEM Education 7: Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6.
MacLure, Maggie. 2005. “‘Clarity Bordering on Stupidity’: Where’s the Quality in Systematic Review?” Journal of Education Policy 20 (4): 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500131801.
MacMillan, Margy. 2018. “The SoTL Literature: Exploring New Territories.” In SoTL in Action: Illuminating Critical Moments of Practice, edited by Nancy L. Chick, 23–31. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus.
Maxwell, Joseph A. 2006. “Literature Reviews of, and for, Educational Research: A Commentary on Boote and Beile’s ‘Scholars Before Researchers.’” Educational Researcher 35 (9): 28–31. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035009028.
Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy, Sam Lucie Dvorakova, Kelly E. Matthews, Sophia Abbot, Breagh Cheng, Peter Felten, Kris Knorr, Elizabeth Marquis, Rafaella Shammas, and Kelly Swaim. 2017. “A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119.
Miller-Young, Janice, and Michelle Yeo. 2015. “Conceptualizing and Communicating SoTL: A Framework for the Field.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 3 (2): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.37.
Minocha, Shailey. 2021. “Literature Review for SoTL Inquiry.” In Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in STEM, Milton Keynes. Open University. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=109157§ion=5.
Montuori, Alphonso. 2005. “Literature Review as Creative Inquiry: Reframing Scholarship as a Creative Process.” Journal of Transformative Education 3 (4): 374–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605279381.
Mott, Carrie, and Daniel Cockayne. 2017. “Citation Matters: Mobilizing the Politics of Citation toward a Practice of ‘Conscientious Engagement.’” Gender, Place & Culture 24 (7): 954–73.
Munn, Zachary, Micah D. J. Peters, Cindy Stern, Catalin Tufanaru, Alexa McArthur, and Edoardo Aromataris. 2018. “Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors when Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 18: Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
Ní Bheoláin, Ruth, Rob Lowney, and Fiona O’Riordan. 2020. Students as Partners in Assessment: A Literature Scoping Review. Dublin: Dublin City University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4270579.
Paré, Guy, Marie-Claude Trudel, Mirou Jaana, and Spyros Kitsiou. 2015. “Synthesizing Information Systems Knowledge: A Typology of Literature Reviews.” Information & Management 52 (2): 183–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008.
Pleschová, Gabriella, and Lynn McAlpine. 2015. “Enhancing University Teaching and Learning through Mentoring: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 4 (2): 107–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-06-2014-0020.
Reedy, Alison Kay, and María Lucía Guerrero Farías. 2019. “Teaching and Learning Research in Higher Education in Colombia: A Literature Review.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South 3 (2): 10–30. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v3i2.113.
Rethlefsen, Melissa L., Shona Kirtley, Siw Waffenschmidt, Ana Patricia Ayala, David Moher, Matthew J. Page, Jonathan B. Koffel, and PRISMA-S Group. 2021. “PRISMA-S: An Extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.” Systematic Reviews 10: Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
Rowland, Susan L., and Paula Myatt. 2014. “Getting Started in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A ‘How To’ Guide for Science Academics.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 42 (1): 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20748.
Sukhera, Javeed. 2022a. “Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14 (4): 414–17. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1.
Sukhera, Javeed. 2022b. “Narrative Reviews in Medical Education: Key Steps for Researchers.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14 (4): 418–19. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00481.1.
Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning. n.d. Situating Your Project within Larger Conversations: Doing a Lit Review. Calgary: University of Calgary. (Accessed December 6, 2022). http://sotl.ucalgaryblogs.ca/files/2015/11/2SoTLLitReview.pdf.
Thomson, Pat. 2018a. “Why is Writing a Literature Review Such Hard Work? Part One.” Patter. Last modified June 11, 2018. https://patthomson.net/2018/06/11/why-is-writing-a-literature-review-such-hard-work-part-one/.
Thomson, Pat. 2018b. “Quick Lit – Rapid Evidence Reviewing.” Patter. Last modified May 14, 2018. https://patthomson.net/2018/05/14/quick-lit-rapid-evidence-reviewing/.
Thomson, Pat. 2019. “Introductions: Establishing Significance.” Patter. Last modified April 1, 2019. https://patthomson.net/2019/04/01/write-a-compelling-introduction/.
Tight, Malcolm. 2018a. “Higher Education Journals: Their Characteristics and Contribution.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (3): 607–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1389858.
Tight, Malcolm. 2018b. “Tracking the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Policy Reviews in Higher Education 2 (1): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1390690.
Tight, Malcolm. 2021. Syntheses of Higher Education Research: What We Know. London: Bloomsbury.
Torraco, Richard J. 2016. “Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future.” Human Resource Development Review 15 (4): 404–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606.
Walter, Lori, and Jordan Stouck. 2020. “Writing the Literature Review: Graduate Student Experiences.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 11 (1): Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.1.8295.
Webb, Oliver, Lynne Wyness, and Debby Cotton. 2017. Enhancing Access, Retention, Attainment and Progression in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature Showing Demonstrable Impact. York: HE Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/enhancing-access-retention-attainment-and-progression-higher-education.
Weller, Saranne. 2011. “New Lecturers’ Accounts of Reading Higher Education Research.” Studies in Continuing Education 33 (1): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.516744.
Wilson, Anne. 2022. “Using Literature Reviews to Strengthen Research: Tips for PhDs and Supervisors.” Times Higher. Last modified March 9, 2022. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/using-literature-reviews-strengthen-research-tips-phds-and-supervisors.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mick Healey, Ruth L. Healey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
