Searching the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective

Part 1

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.4

Keywords:

SoTL literature search, academic literacies, searching using comprehensive tools, searching using selective sources, citation practices

Abstract

There are few references that critically evaluate the different ways of searching the literature on scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), or how these are related to researchers’ goals. We use an academic literacies perspective as a lens with which to explore the different ways that literature searches may be undertaken. While searching the literature is often presented as a scientific objective process, the reality is much messier, nuanced, and iterative. It is a complex, context-dependent process. We provide a practical, critical guide to undertaking SoTL literature searches and argue that these need to be seen as socially constructed processes. There is no one right way of searching the SoTL literature. The academic literacies perspective leads us to emphasise the variety of different purposes for carrying out a literature search. We distinguish between using comprehensive tools and selective sources. We end by arguing that there is a need for SoTL researchers to be less insular and take purposeful steps to search for, cite, and amplify diverse voices. This article complements a separate one where we review and synthesise the SoTL literature.

Click here to read the corresponding ISSOTL blog post.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Mick Healey, Healey HE Consultants

Mick Healey is director of Healey HE Consultants and emeritus professor at University of Gloucestershire (UK).

Ruth L. Healey, University of Chester

Ruth L. Healey is professor of teaching and learning in higher education at University of Chester (UK) and director of Healey HE Consultants.

References

Adds, Peter, Meegan Hall, Rawinia Higgins, and Te Ripowai Higgins. 2011. “Ask the Posts of Our House: Using Cultural Spaces to Encourage Quality Learning in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (5): 541–51. http://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.570440.

Becher, Tony, and Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. 2nd Edition. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Behari-Leak, Kasturi. 2020. “Toward a Borderless, Decolonized, Socially Just, and Inclusive Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (1): 4–23. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.2.

Bell, Judith, and Stephen Waters. 2018. Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education and Social Science. 7th Edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Blair, Erik. 2013. “The Challenge of Contextualising the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1 (1): 127–29. http://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.127.

Boell, Sebastian K., and Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic. 2014. “A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34, 257–86. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412.

Booth, Shirley, and Lorenzo C. Woollacott. 2018. “On the Constitution of SoTL: Its Domains and Contexts.” Higher Education 75 (3): 537–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0156-7.

Boyer, Ernst L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://depts.washington.edu/gs630/Spring/Boyer.pdf.

Chick, Nancy L. 2016. “The SoTL Lit Review.” The SoTL Librarian. Last modified January 24, 2016. https://nancychick.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/the-sotl-lit-review-the-sotl-librarian/.

Chick, Nancy L., Sophia Abbot, Lucy Mercer-Mapstone, Christopher P. Ostrowdun, and Krista Grensavitch. 2021. “Naming is Power: Citation Practices in SoTL.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.2.

Chick, Nancy L., La Vonne Cornell-Swanson, Katina Lazarides, and Renee Meyers. 2014. “Reconciling Apples & Oranges: A Constructivist SoTL Writing Program.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 8 (2): Article 13. http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol8/iss2/.

Chick, Nancy, Lorelli Nowell, and Bartlomiej Lenart. 2019. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Scoping Review Protocol.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 7 (2): 186–97. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.12.

Chng, Huang Hoon, Brenda Leibowitz, and Katarina Mårtensson. 2020. “Leading Change from Different Shores: The Challenges of Contextualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 8 (1): 24–41. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.3.

Chng, Huang Hoon, and Peter Looker. 2013. “On the Margins of SoTL Discourse: An Asian Perspective.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 1 (1): 131–45. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.131.

Cleaver, Elizabeth, Maxine Lintern, and Mike McLinden. 2018. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Disciplinary Approaches to Educational Enquiry. London: Sage.

Coleman, Lynne, and Amanda Morris. 2021. ‘“You Become Academic Royalty Once You’ve Published’: A Social Practice Exploration of Identity in Academic Writing.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South 5 (2): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v5i2.192.

Drawson, Alexandra S., Elaine Toombs, and Christopher J. Mushquash. 2017. “Indigenous Research Methods: A Systematic Review.” International Indigenous Policy Journal 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.5.

Dewar, Jacqueline M., and Curtis D. Bennett. 2015. “Initiating a SoTL Investigation.” In Doing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Mathematics, edited by Jacqueline M. Dewar, and Curtis D. Bennett, 13–18. Washington: Mathematical Association of America.

El-Farargy, Nancy. 2012. “Educational Research: Reviewing the Literature.” New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences 8 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i8.487.

Fister, Barbara. 2015. “The Social Life of Knowledge: Faculty Epistemologies. In Not Just Where to Click: Teaching Students to Think About Information, edited by Troy A. Swanson, and Heather Jagman, 87–104. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries. https://barbarafister.net/SocialLife.pdf.

Fried Foster, Nancy. 2010. “The Librarian‐Student‐Faculty Triangle: Conflicting Research Strategies?” Paper Presented at the Association of Research Library’s Library Assessment Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, October 26, 2010. https://urresearch.rochester.edu/researcherFileDownload.action?researcherFileId=71.

Gill, Navroop. 2021. “Education Databases.” In Research Guides: Scholarship of Learning and Teaching (SoTL). University of Toronto Libraries. https://guides.library.utoronto.ca/SOTL_journals_databases/SOTL_Databases.

Google Scholar. 2022. “About.” Last modified February 4, 2022. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html.

Gourlay, Lesley. 2009. “Threshold Practices: Becoming a Student through Academic Literacies.” London Review of Education 7 (2): 181–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460903003626.

Guzmán-Valenzuela, Carolina. 2017. “The Geopolitics of Research in Teaching and Learning in the University in Latin America.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South 1 (1): 4–18. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v1i1.10.

Hart, Chris. 2001. Doing a Literature Search: A Comprehensive Guide for the Social Sciences. London: SAGE.

Hart, Chris. 2018. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. 2nd Edition. London: SAGE.

Hawkins, Kaitlyn, Rui Liu, Max Liborion, and Molly Rivers. 2021. “The Researchers that Search Engines Make Invisible.” Civic Laboratory for Environmental Action Research (CLEAR) Blog. Last modified June 10, 2021. https://civiclaboratory.nl/2021/06/10/the-researchers-that-search-engines-make-invisible/.

Healey, Mick. 2000. “Developing the Scholarship of Teaching through the Disciplines.” Higher Education Research & Development 19 (2): 169–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445637.

Healey, Mick, and Ruth L. Healey. 2018. “‘It Depends’: Exploring the Context-Dependent Nature of Students as Partners Practices and Policies.” International Journal for Students as Partners 2 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3472.

Healey, Mick, and Ruth L. Healey. 2023. “Reviewing the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective Part 2.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 11. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.5.

Healey, Mick, Kelly E. Matthews, and Alison Cook-Sather. 2019. “Writing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Articles for Peer-reviewed Journals.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 7 (2): 28–50. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.3.

Healey, Mick, Kelly E. Matthews, and Alison Cook-Sather. 2020. Writing about Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Creating and Contributing to Scholarly Conversations across a Range of Genres. Elon: Center for Engaged Learning Open-Access Books. https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/books/writing-about-learning/.

Healey, Ruth L., and Mick Healey. 2022. Socially-just Pedagogic Practices in HE: Including Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, Anti-Racism, Decolonising, Indigenisation, Well-being, and Disability. https://www.healeyheconsultants.co.uk/resources.

Healey, Ruth L., and Mick Healey. 2023. “Identifying and Reviewing the Key Literature for your Assignment.” In Key Methods in Geography, 4th Edition, edited by Nicholas J. Clifford, Meghan Cope, and Thomas Gillespie. London: SAGE.

Hilsdon, John, Cathy Malone, and Alicja Syska. 2019. “Academic Literacies Twenty Years on: A Community-Sourced Literature Review.” Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 15 (November). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i15.567.

Huber, Mary Taylor, and Pat Hutchings. 2005. The Advancement of Learning: Building the Teaching Commons. A Carnegie Foundation Report on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Jensenius, Francesca R., Mala Htun, David J. Samuels, David A. Singer, Adria Lawrence, and Michael Chwe. 2018. “The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 820–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800094X.

Juntunen, Mari, and Mirjam Lehenkari. 2021. “A Narrative Literature Review Process for an Academic Business Research Thesis.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (2): 330–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1630813.

Kemtes, Karen A., Kelli Smith, Brad Donohue, Krisann M. Alvarez, Kimberly M. Carpin, and Jennifer Sinchak. 2003. “A Systematic Approach to Conducting Educational Literature Searches.” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education 51 (2): 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377366.2003.10400252.

Lea, Mary R. 2017. “Academic Literacies in Theory and Practice.” In: Literacies and Language Education. 3rd Edition. Edited by Barry V. Street, and Stephen May, 127–58. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_19.

Lea, Mary R., and Barry Stierer. 2009. “Lecturers’ Everyday Writing as Professional Practice in the University as Workplace: New Insights into Academic Identities.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (4): 417–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771952.

Lea, Mary R., and Barry Stierer. 2011. “Changing Academic Identities in Changing Academic Workplaces: Learning from Academics’ Everyday Professional Writing Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (6): 605–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560380.

Lea, Mary R., and Brian V. Street 1998. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 157–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.

Lillis, Theresa, and Mary Scott. 2007. “Defining Academic Literacies Research: Issues of Epistemology, Ideology and Strategy.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 4 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5.

Lillis, Theresa, and Jackie Tuck. 2016. “Academic Literacies: A Critical Lens on Writing and Reading in the Academy.” In: The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, edited by Ken Hyland and Philip Shaw, 30–43. London: Routledge.

Looker, Peter. 2020. “Cultural Contexts of Conversations and Communities.” In Writing about Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Creating and Contributing to Scholarly Conversations across a Range of Genres, by Mick Healey, Kelly E. Matthews, and Alison Cook-Sather, 30. Elon: Center for Engaged Learning Open-Access Books.

MacMillan, Margy. 2018. “The SoTL Literature: Exploring New Territories.” In SoTL in Action: Illuminating Critical Moments of Practice, edited by Nancy L. Chick, 23–31. Sterling, Va.: Stylus.

Martín-Martín, Alberto, Enrique Orduna-Malea, Mike Thelwall, and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar. 2018. “Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A Systematic Comparison of Citations in 252 Subject Categories.” Journal of Informetrics 12 (4): 1160–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002.

Matthews, David. 2021. “Will a Facebook-style News Feed Aid Discovery or Destroy Serendipity?” Times Higher Education. Last modified August 5, 2021. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/will-facebook-style-news-feed-aid-discovery-or-destroy-serendipity.

McKinney, Kathleen. 2007. Enhancing Learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The Challenges and Joys of Juggling. Boston, Mass.: Anker.

Mignolo, Walter D. 2009. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society 26 (7/8): 159–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275.

Minocha, Shailey. 2021. “Literature Review for SoTL Inquiry.” In Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in STEM, Milton Keynes, Open University. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=109157&section=5.

Montuori, Alphonso. 2005. “Literature Review as Creative Inquiry: Reframing Scholarship as a Creative Process.” Journal of Transformative Education 3 (4): 374–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605279381.

Mott, Carrie, and Daniel Cockayne. 2017. “Citation Matters: Mobilizing the Politics of Citation toward a Practice of ‘Conscientious Engagement.’” Gender, Place & Culture 24 (7): 954–73.

Moz. nd. “Google Search Operators.” Accessed December 6, 2022. https://moz.com/learn/seo/search-operators.

Naylor, Sharon. 2006. “Personal Communication.” In Enhancing Learning Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The Challenges and Joys of Juggling, by Kathleen McKinnney, 37–39. Bolton, Mass.: Anker.

Ní Bheoláin, Ruth, Rob Lowney, and Fiona O’Riordan. 2020. Students as Partners in Assessment: A Literature Scoping Review. Dublin: Dublin City University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4270579.

Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.

Nygaard, Lynn P. 2017. “Publishing and Perishing: An Academic Literacies Framework for Investigating Research Productivity.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 519–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1058351.

Panch, Trishan, Heather Mattie, and Rifat Atun. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Bias: Implications for Health Systems.” Journal of Global Health 9 (2): 020318. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020318.

Paperpile. 2022. “The Top List of Academic Search Engines.” Last modified February 4, 2022. https://paperpile.com/g/academic-search-engines/.

Parker, Jan. 2011. “Expanding the Disciplines through SoTL.” In The 8th International Conference of the London Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Proceedings 2010: Disciplines, Pedagogies and Cultures for SoTL, edited by Joëlle Fanghanel, Dan Bernstein, Mary Huber, Denis Berthiaume, Digby Warren, Torgny Roxa, and Nicole Rege Colet, 113–19. London: University of West London. https://cidtff.web.ua.pt/producao/ana_vitoria_batista/proceedings_londonsotl_2010.pdf#page=113.

Poirier, Therese, and Erin Behnen. 2014. “Where and How to Search for Evidence in the Education Literature: The WHEEL.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 78 (4): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78470.

Roux, Kate le, Dale L. Taylor, Bruce Kloot, and Saalih Allie. 2021. “Research on Higher Education: A Perspective on the Relations Between Higher Education Studies and Discipline-Based Education Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 26 (1): 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1634538.

Sage. nd. “Help Readers Find Your Article.” Accessed December 6, 2022. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/help-readers-find-your-article.

Tetzner, Rene. 2021. “Why does Google Scholar not Find My Research Paper?” Proof Reading Service July 1, 2021. https://www.proof-reading-service.com/en/blog/why-does-google-scholar-not-find-my-research-paper/.

Thomson, Pat. 2020. “How to Start your Literature Review.” Patter. Last modified August 3, 2020. https://patthomson.net/2020/08/03/how-to-start-on-a-literature-review/.

Thomson, Pat. 2022. “Small Scholarly Worlds.” Patter. Last modified October 17, 2022. https://patthomson.net/2022/10/17/small-scholarly-worlds/.

Tight, Malcolm. 2008. “Higher Education Research as Tribe, Territory and/or Community: A Co-citation Analysis.” Higher Education 55: 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9077-1.

Weller, Saranne. 2011. “New Lecturers’ Accounts of Reading Higher Education Research.” Studies in Continuing Education 33 (1): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.516744.

Stack of books on literature review and SoTL.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-16

How to Cite

Healey, Mick, and Ruth L. Healey. 2023. “Searching the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective: Part 1”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 11 (January). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.4.