Student Perception of a Visual Novel for Fostering Science Process Skills

Michael Wong; Ahmed  Al-Arnawoot; Katrina  Hass

doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.32

Authors

Michael Wong McMaster University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8491-4787
Ahmed Al-Arnawoot University of Ottawa
Katrina Hass University of Toronto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.32

Keywords:

science process skills, active learning, problem-based learning, fiction, student engagement

Abstract

In undergraduate science education, emphasis is often placed on teaching subject matter rather than science process skills (e.g., critical thinking, problem solving). Although important to scientific training, these skills are often not taught because science educators do not feel equipped to teach them. We therefore present a case-scenario activity that aims to facilitate the development of science process skills. This activity, which takes the form of a visual novel, asks students to generate hypotheses for the seemingly odd events that are described in the story. We implemented this activity in a science-process-focused course. Upon completion of the activity, we asked students to submit a written response to the prompt: “What are you taking away from the activity?” In this exploratory study, we conducted a qualitative analysis of these written responses to ascertain whether meaningful codes and themes related to science process would arise from this open-ended prompt. Based on student responses, four main themes emerged: scientific inquiry, student satisfaction, flexibility, and collaboration. These results demonstrated the activity was both enjoyable, and it successfully enabled students to apply science process skills. We offer this activity in anticipation it will provide educators with a tool to include these skills in their classes.

Author Biographies

Michael Wong, McMaster University

Michael Wong is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences and an instructor in the Bachelor of Health Sciences (Honours) Program at McMaster University (Canada).

Ahmed Al-Arnawoot, University of Ottawa

Ahmed Al-Arnawoot is currently a second-year medical student at the University of Ottawa (Canada). He also holds a Master of Science in Medical Sciences from McMaster University.

Katrina Hass, University of Toronto

Katrina Hass holds a Master of Science in Biomedical Communications from the University of Toronto (Canada).

References

Addis, Elizabeth, and Jo Anne Powell-Coffman. 2018. “Student and Faculty Views on Process of Science Skills at a Large, Research-Intensive University.” Journal of College Science Teaching 47 (4): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_047_04_72.

Amabile, Teresa M. 1998. How to Kill Creativity. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Ashby, Iryna, and Marisa Exter. 2019. “Designing for Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education: Considerations for Instructional Designers.” TechTrends 63 (2): 202–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0352-z.

Bacon, Donald R., and Kim A. Stewart. 2006. “How Fast Do Students Forget What They Learn in Consumer Behavior? A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Marketing Education 28 (3): 181–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475306291463.

Blatch, Sydella A., William Cliff, Beth Beason-Abmayr, and Patricia A. Halpin. 2017. “The Fictional Animal Project: A Tool for Helping Students Integrate Body Systems.” Advances in Physiology Education 41 (2): 239–43. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00159.2016.

Bree, Ronan, and Gerry Gallagher. 2016. “Using Microsoft Excel to Code and Thematically Analyse Qualitative Data: A Simple, Cost-Effective Approach.” All Ireland Journal of Higher Education 8 (2): 2811–28114. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/281.

Brownell, Sara E., Daria S. Hekmat-Scafe, Veena Singla, Patricia Chandler Seawell, Jamie F. Conklin Imam, Sarah L. Eddy, Tim Stearns, and Martha S. Cyert. 2015. “A High-Enrollment Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Improves Student Conceptions of Scientific Thinking and Ability to Interpret Data.” Edited by James Hewlett. CBE—Life Sciences Education 14 (2): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092.

Bunce, Diane M., Elizabeth A. Flens, and Kelly Y. Neiles. 2010. “How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers.” Journal of Chemical Education 87 (12): 1438–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100409p.

Chin, Christine, and Li-Gek Chia. 2004. “Problem-Based Learning: Using Students’ Questions to Drive Knowledge Construction.” Science Education 88 (5): 707–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10144.

Cleary-Holdforth, Joanne. 2007. “Student Non-Attendance in Higher Education A Phenomenon of Student Apathy or Poor Pedagogy?” Level 3 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.21427/D71T7F.

Coil, David, Mary Pat Wenderoth, Matthew Cunningham, and Clarissa Dirks. 2010. “Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology.” Edited by Martha Grossel. CBE—Life Sciences Education 9 (4): 524–35. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005.

Coleman, Charles, and Cynthia Conrad. 2007. “Understanding the Negative Graduate Student Perceptions of Required Statistics and Research Methods Courses: Implications for Programs and Faculty.” Journal of College Teaching & Learning 4 (3): 11–20.

Cookson, April, Daesang Kim, and Taralynn Hartsell. 2020. “Enhancing Student Achievement, Engagement, and Satisfaction Using Animated Instructional Videos.” International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 16 (3): 113–25. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2020070108.

Cowden, Chapel D., and Manuel F. Santiago. 2016. “Interdisciplinary Explorations: Promoting Critical Thinking via Problem-Based Learning in an Advanced Biochemistry Class.” Journal of Chemical Education 93 (3): 464–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00378.

Custers, Eugène J. F. M. 2010. “Long-Term Retention of Basic Science Knowledge: A Review Study.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 15 (1): 109–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9101-y.

DeSouza Fleith, Denise. 2000. “Teacher and Student Perceptions of Creativity in the Classroom Environment.” Roeper Review 22 (3): 148–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554022.

DiCarlo, Stephen E. 2009. “Too Much Content, Not Enough Thinking, and Too Little FUN!” Advances in Physiology Education 33 (4): 257–64. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00075.2009.

Dirks, Clarissa, and Matthew Cunningham. 2006. “Enhancing Diversity in Science: Is Teaching Science Process Skills the Answer?” Edited by Jo Handelsman. CBE—Life Sciences Education 5 (3): 218–26. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-10-0121.

Earley, Mark A. 2014. “A Synthesis of the Literature on Research Methods Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (3): 242–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860105.

Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

Galbraith, Michael W., and Melanie S. Jones. 2012. “Creativity: Essential for the Adult Education Instructor and Learner.” PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning 21: 51–59.

Gilboy, Mary Beth, Scott Heinerichs, and Gina Pazzaglia. 2015. “Enhancing Student Engagement Using the Flipped Classroom.” Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 47 (1): 109–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008.

Graneheim, Ulla H., and Berit Lundman. 2004. “Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness.” Nurse Education Today 24 (2): 105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.

Ivanitskaya, Lana, Deborah Clark, George Montgomery, and Ronald Primeau. 2002. “Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes.” Innovative Higher Education 27: 95–111. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1023/A:1021105309984.

Kardash, CarolAnne M. 2000. “Evaluation of Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors.” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191.

Ketelhut, Diane Jass. 2007. “The Impact of Student Self-Efficacy on Scientific Inquiry Skills: An Exploratory Investigation in River City, a Multi-User Virtual Environment.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (1): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9038-y.

Kinner, David, and Mark Lord. 2018. “Student-Perceived Gains in Collaborative, Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences in the Geosciences.” Journal of College Science Teaching 48 (2): 48–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26616270.

Kiran, H.S., Thomas V. Chacko, K.A. Sudharshana Murthy, and H. Basavana Gowdappa. 2016. “Enhancing the Clinical Reasoning Skills of Postgraduate Students in Internal Medicine through Medical Nonfiction and Nonmedical Fiction Extracurricular Books.” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 91 (12): 1761–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.07.022.

Laal, Marjan, and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. “Benefits of Collaborative Learning.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31: 486–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091.

Lei, Hao, Yunhuo Cui, and Wenye Zhou. 2018. “Relationships Between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Social Behavior and Personality 46 (3): 517–28. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054.

Liu, Chelsea, and Philip Elms. 2019. “Animating Student Engagement: The Impacts of Cartoon Instructional Videos on Learning Experience.” Research in Learning Technology 27: 2124. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2124.

Maksić, Slavica B., and Vera Z. Spasenović. 2018. “Educational Science Students’ Implicit Theories of Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 30 (3): 287–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488200.

Mann, Sandi, and Andrew Robinson. 2009. “Boredom in the Lecture Theatre: An Investigation into the Contributors, Moderators and Outcomes of Boredom amongst University Students.” British Educational Research Journal 35 (2): 243–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802042911.

McKinnell, Jennifer, Andrea McLellan, Stash Nastos, Debbie Nifakis, Sean Park, Stacey Ritz, Henry Szechtman et al. 2005. “Skill Development with Students and Explicit Integration Across Four Years of the Curriculum.” In The Alan Blizzard Award – The Award Winning Papers. McGraw-Hill Ryerson.

Mestre, Jose P. 2005. “Facts and Myths about Pedagogies of Engagement in Science Learning.” Peer Review 7 (2): 24–27.

Mikol, Carmella. 2005. “Teaching Nursing without Lecturing: Critical Pedagogy as Communicative Dialogue.” Nursing Education Perspectives 26 (2): 86-89. https://journals.lww.com/neponline/Fulltext/2005/03000/Teaching_Nursing_Without_Lecturing__CRITICAL.7.aspx?casa_token=YEeWuy8xQpoAAAAA:nv_LNkVoO6P4bHh5E2fsORbkLdHRF6W5GyBm8iLhl8Kd6-XYb1MMmPgyKFGGAc-9uB2x-uy0dME3GQXBlU4Qtyee.

Parcha, Joshua M. 2021. “CONE (Creativity, Originality, and Novelty of Expression) Projects: Explaining Course Concepts through Creative Thinking.” College Teaching 69 (2): 107–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1832434.

Robinson, Betty, and Robert M. Schaible. 1995. “Collaborative Teaching: Reaping the Benefits.” College Teaching 43 (2): 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1995.9925515.

Roehl, Amy, Shweta Linga Reddy, and Gayla Jett Shannon. 2013. “The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity to Engage Millennial Students through Active Learning Strategies.” Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences 105 (2): 44–49.

Rose, David H., Wendy S. Harbour, Catherine Sam Johnston, Samantha G. Daley, and Linda Abarbanell. 2006. “Universal Design for Learning in Postsecondary Education: Reflections on Principles and Their Application.” Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 19 (2): 135–51.

Sabel, Jaime L., Joseph T. Dauer, and Cory T. Forbes. 2017. “Introductory Biology Students’ Use of Enhanced Answer Keys and Reflection Questions to Engage in Metacognition and Enhance Understanding.” Edited by Debra Tomanek. CBE—Life Sciences Education 16 (3): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0298.

Seemiller, Corey, and Meghan Grace. 2017. “Generation Z: Educating and Engaging the next Generation of Students.” About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience 22 (3): 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293.

Seibert, Susan A. 2021. “Problem-Based Learning: A Strategy to Foster Generation Z’s Critical Thinking and Perseverance.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing 16 (1): 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.09.002.

Selmo, Laura, and Jole Orsenigo. 2014. “Learning and Sharing through Reflective Practice in Teacher Education in Italy.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (February): 1925–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.496.

Seymour, Elaine, Anne-Barrie Hunter, Sandra L. Laursen, and Tracee DeAntoni. 2004. “Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for Undergraduates in the Sciences: First Findings from a Three-Year Study.” Science Education 88 (4): 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131.

Stains, Marilyne, Jordan Harshman, Megan K. Barker, Stephanie V. Chasteen, Renee Cole, Sue Ellen DeChenne-Peters, M. Kevin Eagan Jr. et al. 2018. “Anatomy of STEM Teaching in North American Universities.” Science 359 (6383): 1468–70. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892.

Tsai, Kuan Chen. 2012. “The Value of Teaching Creativity in Adult Education.” International Journal of Higher Education 1 (2): 84–91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p84.

Vieira, Rui Marques, Celina Tenreiro-Vieira, and Isabel P Martins. 2011. “Critical Thinking: Conceptual Clarification and Its Importance in Science Education.” Science Education International 22 (1): 43–54.

Voice, Alison, and Arran Stirton. 2020. “Spaced Repetition: Towards More Effective Learning in STEM.” New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i15.3376.

Wain, Amanda. 2017. “Learning through Reflection.” British Journal of Midwifery 25 (10): 662–66. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2017.25.10.662.

Zayapragassarazan, Z., and Santosh Kumar. 2012. “Active Learning Methods.” NTTC Bulletin 19 (1): 3–5.