Metacognition in Teaching: Using A “Rapid Responses to Learning” Process to Reflect on and Improve Pedagogy

Authors

  • Susan Cox University of British Columbia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-9587
  • Kate Jongbloed University of British Columbia
  • Charlyn Black University of British Columbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.27

Keywords:

metacognition and teaching, formative feedback, classroom assessment technique, pedagogy, teacher self-assessment

Abstract

In this paper, we critically evaluate the use of a weekly “rapid responses (RR) to learning” process in the context of teaching a graduate course on research methods over a three-year period. The RR process involves use of a short set of open-ended questions about key moments in learning that students complete, in writing, during the last five minutes of each class. The questions ask students to identify salient take-away messages, note when they felt the most and least engaged, name actions taken by anyone that were affirming or confusing, and consider specific “aha” moments. Our specific aim was to assess the following questions: What was the pedagogic value of the RR process? How did it inform our teaching and to what extent were there direct benefits of the process for students as well as for us as teachers? We found that the systematic feedback we obtained in this way supports weekly monitoring of student learning, facilitates response to trouble spots, and assists in assessment of student engagement and classroom climate. It also provides insight into the efficacy of pedagogic strategies, invites students to engage in metacognitive learning about their own learning, and models a process of instructors receiving feedback and being flexible to change. For instructors, the process enhances motivation and professional development and can be used to document instructor leadership and development. Finally, it facilitates deeper appreciation of the need to better integrate student self-assessment and the development of metacognitive skills as core components of the course.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Susan Cox, University of British Columbia

Susan M. Cox is professor and director of the MSc and PhD Programs in the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia.

Kate Jongbloed, University of British Columbia

Kate Jongbloed is a Canadian Institutes of Health Research— Michael Smith Health Research BC Health Systems Impact postdoctoral fellow with the BC Office of the Provincial Health Officer and the University of Victoria.

Charlyn Black, University of British Columbia

Charlyn Black is professor in the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia.

References

Andrade, Heidi L. 2019. “A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-assessment." Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087.

Angelo, Thomas A., and K. Patricia Cross. 1993. “Minute Paper."” Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd Ed.): 148–53. Jossey Bass: San Francisco.

Arend, Bridget, Beth Archer-Kuhn, Kazuko Hiramatsu, Chris Ostrowdun, Janel Seeley, and Adrian Jones. 2021. “Minding the Gap: Comparing Student and Instructor Experiences with Critical Reflection.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9 (1): 317–32. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.21.

Bloom, Benjamin S. 1956. “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive Domain.” New York: McKay. 20–24.

Brookfield, Stephen D. 2017. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. John Wiley & Sons.

Butterfield, Lee D., William A. Borgen, Norman E. Amundson, and Asa-Sophia T. Maglio. 2005. “Fifty Years of the Critical Incident Technique: 1954–2004 and Beyond.” Qualitative Research 5 (4): 475–97. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794105056924.

Cottrell, David, Sue Kilminster, Brian Jolly, and Janet Grant. 2002. “What is Effective Supervision and How Does it Happen? A Critical Incident Study.” Medical Education 36 (11): 1042–49. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01327.x.

Flanagan, John C. 1954. “The Critical Incident Technique.” Psychological Bulletin 51 (4): 327. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470.

Fook, Jan. 2007. “Chapter 26: Reflective Practice and Critical Reflection.” In Practising Critical Reflection: A Resource Handbook, edited by Jan Fook and Fiona Gardner. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2015. Simply Rational: Decision Making in the Real World. Evolution and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Heaslip, Graham, Paul Donovan, and John G. Cullen. 2014. “Student Response Systems and Learner Engagement in Large Classes.” Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (1): 11¬24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514648.

Hickson, Helen. 2011. “Critical Reflection: Reflecting on Learning to Be Reflective.” Reflective Practice 12 (6): 829–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.616687.

Keefer, Jeffrey M. 2009. “The Critical Incident Questionnaire (CIQ): From Research to Practice and Back Again.” Proceedings of the 50th Annual Adult Education Research Conference.

Kuit, Judith A., Gill Reay, and Richard Freeman. 2001. “Experiences of Reflective Teaching.” Active Learning in Higher Education 2 (2): 128–42. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787401002002004.

Lister, Pam Green, and Beth R. Crisp. 2007. “Critical Incident Analyses: A Practice Learning Tool for Students and Practitioners.” Practice 19 (1): 47–60.

Maurer, Trent W., Cherie Woolmer, Nichole L. Powell, Carol Sisson, Catherine Snelling, Odd Rune Stalheim, and Ian J. Turner. 2021. “Sharing SoTL Findings with Students: An Intentional Knowledge Mobilization Strategy.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9 (1): 333–49. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.22.

McCormick, Rod M. 1997. “Healing Through Interdependence: The Role of Connecting in First Nations Healing Practices.” Canadian Journal of Counselling 31 (3): 172–84.

McKinney, Kathleen. 2012. “Increasing the Impact of SoTL: Two Sometimes Neglected Opportunities.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060103.

McMillan, James H., and Jessica Hearn. 2008. “Student Self-assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement.” Educational Horizons 87 (1): 40–49.

Narayanasamy, Aru, and Jan Owens. 2001. “A Critical Incident Study of Nurses’ Responses to the Spiritual Needs of their Patients.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 (4): 446–55. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01690.x.

Tanner, Kimberly D. 2012. “Promoting Student Metacognition.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 11 (2): 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033.

University of Waterloo Centre for Teaching Excellence. n.d. “Critical Reflection.” https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/planning-courses-and-assignments/course-design/critical-reflection.

Victoroff, Kristin Zakariasen, and Sarah Hogan. 2006. “Students’ Perceptions of Effective Learning Experiences in Dental School: A Qualitative Study Using a Critical Incident Technique." Journal of Dental Education 70 (2): 124–32.

Wirth, Karl. n.d. “Reading Reflections.” Accessed March 13, 2021. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/metacognition/activities/27560.html.

Zepke, Nick. 2013. “Threshold Concepts and Student Engagement: Revisiting Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (2): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413481127.

Zepke, Nick, and Linda Leach. 2010. “Improving Student Engagement: Ten Proposals for Action.” Active Learning in Higher Education 11 (3): 167–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-08

How to Cite

Cox, Susan, Kate Jongbloed, and Charlyn Black. 2022. “Metacognition in Teaching: Using A ‘Rapid Responses to Learning’ Process to Reflect on and Improve Pedagogy”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 10 (August). https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.27.